A spatio-temporal accessibility measure for modelling activity participation in discretionary activities

Accessibility is a key indicator for the number of opportunities experienced by an individual, and it is generally assumed that higher levels of accessibility lead to higher levels of activity participation and satisfaction. Despite the fact that this relationship has been tested in preceding studies, no clear pattern of correlation has been found between an individual's accessibility and his/her participation in out-of-home discretionary activities. Previous studies mostly applied aggregate, spatial accessibility measures that do not account for the heterogeneity related to an individual's spatio-temporal constraints. However, in addition to locations' spatial distribution, personal constraints related to the mandatory activities a person undertakes - and therefore, his/her available time budget throughout the day - impact activity choices and scheduling. This paper proposes a disaggregate, person-based accessibility measure that takes spatial and temporal constraints into consideration for the travel behavior of 11,599 individuals in the Wasatch Front region, Utah. This method is compared to an aggregate, home-based accessibility measure to assess both methods' ability to predict activity participation. The results show a highly significant, moderate correlation between the proposed person-based accessibility measure and participants' surveyed partaking in discretionary activities. Both the model prediction and the locally weighted regression smoother indicate that the greatest change in participation occurs within the mid-range of accessibility levels, and not in the low end of the accessibility range as was expected. In addition, the home-based method shows a negative and highly significant relationship to activity participation, which indicates that aggregate accessibility measures may provide counterintuitive findings.

[1]  Graham Currie,et al.  The spatial context of transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being , 2011 .

[2]  K. Axhausen,et al.  An analysis of weekly out-of-home discretionary activity participation and time-use behavior , 2009 .

[3]  Louis Albrechts,et al.  More of the Same is Not Enough! How Could Strategic Spatial Planning Be Instrumental in Dealing with the Challenges Ahead? , 2010 .

[4]  S. Hanson,et al.  Accessibility and Intraurban Travel , 1987 .

[5]  David M Levinson,et al.  Modeling the commute mode share of transit using continuous accessibility to jobs , 2015 .

[6]  K. Martens,et al.  Why Accessibility Measurement is Not Merely an Option, but an Absolute Necessity , 2019, Designing Accessibility Instruments.

[7]  T. Schwanen,et al.  Exploring the Juggling of Responsibilities with Space-Time Accessibility Analysis , 2008 .

[8]  P. Waddell,et al.  Analysis of Lifestyle Choices: Neighborhood Type, Travel Patterns, and Activity Participation , 2002 .

[9]  Tijs Neutens,et al.  An analysis of day-to-day variations in individual space-time accessibility , 2012 .

[10]  Pierluigi Coppola,et al.  Is accessibility relevant in trip generation? Modelling the interaction between trip generation and accessibility taking into account spatial effects , 2017 .

[11]  M. Bradley,et al.  SACSIM: An applied activity-based model system with fine-level spatial and temporal resolution , 2010 .

[12]  Catherine Morency,et al.  A time-use investigation of shopping participation in three Canadian cities: is there evidence of social exclusion? , 2011 .

[13]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  If telecommunication is such a good substitute for travel, why does congestion continue to get worse? , 2009 .

[14]  Sean T. Doherty.  Should we abandon activity type analysis? Redefining activities by their salient attributes , 2006 .

[15]  L. Burns.  Transportation, temporal, and spatial components of accessibility , 1979 .

[16]  M. Hickman,et al.  Household type and structure, time-use pattern, and trip-chaining behavior , 2007 .

[17]  Torsten Hägerstraand.  WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE IN REGIONAL SCIENCE , 1970 .

[18]  Charles L Purvis,et al.  Incorporating Work Trip Accessibility in Nonwork Trip Generation Models in San Francisco Bay Area , 1996 .

[19]  Matthew J. Roorda,et al.  Long- and short-term dynamics in activity scheduling: A structural equations approach , 2008 .

[20]  Mark W. Horner,et al.  Integrating people and place: A density-based measure for assessing accessibility to opportunities , 2014 .

[21]  W. G. Hansen.  How Accessibility Shapes Land Use , 1959 .

[22]  Joel Freedman,et al.  Synthesis of first practices and operational research approaches in activity-based travel demand modeling , 2007 .

[23]  Darren M. Scott,et al.  Exploring day-to-day variability in time use for household members , 2010 .

[24]  J. Humphreys,et al.  A new index of access to primary care services in rural areas , 2009, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[25]  J. G. Koenig,et al.  Indicators of urban accessibility: Theory and application , 1980 .

[26]  J. Preston,et al.  Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion , 2007 .

[27]  S. Farber,et al.  Potential Path Areas and Activity Spaces in Application: A Review , 2015 .

[28]  J. Downes,et al.  Variation of travel time budgets and trip rates in reading , 1981 .

[29]  Graham Currie,et al.  Investigating links between transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being in Melbourne: preliminary results , 2007 .

[30]  M. Kwan.  Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point-based framework , 2010 .

[31]  Tijs Neutens,et al.  Arranging place and time: A GIS toolkit to assess person-based accessibility of urban opportunities , 2010 .

[32]  Tijs Neutens,et al.  A three-dimensional network-based space–time prism , 2008, J. Geogr. Syst..

[33]  Jean-Claude Thill,et al.  Trip making, induced travel demand, and accessibility , 2005, J. Geogr. Syst..

[34]  Karel Martens,et al.  Transport Justice: Designing fair transportation systems , 2016 .

[35]  Karen Lucas,et al.  Making the connections between transport disadvantage and the social exclusion of low income populations in the Tshwane Region of South Africa , 2011 .

[36]  H. Miller.  Place‐Based versus People‐Based Geographic Information Science , 2007 .

[37]  Tijs Neutens,et al.  Accessibility to primary health care in Belgium: an evaluation of policies awarding financial assistance in shortage areas , 2013, BMC Family Practice.

[38]  Martin Dijst,et al.  Time windows in workers' activity patterns: Empirical evidence from the Netherlands , 2003 .

[39]  Chaug-Ing Hsu,et al.  Travel and activity choices based on an individual accessibility model , 2004 .

[40]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Observing the rhythms of daily life: A six-week travel diary , 2002 .

[41]  Bert van Wee,et al.  Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions , 2004 .

[42]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  ALBATROSS: Multiagent, Rule-Based Model of Activity Pattern Decisions , 2000 .

[43]  Mei-Po Kwan,et al.  Space-time accessibility measures: A geocomputational algorithm with a focus on the feasible opportunity set and possible activity duration , 2003, J. Geogr. Syst..

[44]  M. Horner,et al.  Spatiotemporal accessibility to supermarkets using public transit: an interaction potential approach in Cincinnati, Ohio , 2014 .

[45]  Yi-Chang Chiu,et al.  Integrated Land Use–Transport Model System with Dynamic Time-Dependent Activity–Travel Microsimulation , 2012 .

[46]  Tijs Neutens,et al.  Evaluating the Temporal Organization of Public Service Provision Using Space-Time Accessibility Analysis , 2010 .

[47]  Tijs Neutens,et al.  Identifying public transport gaps using time-dependent accessibility levels , 2015 .

[48]  E. I. Pas,et al.  Socio-demographics, activity participation and travel behavior , 1999 .

[49]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A household-level activity pattern generation model with an application for Southern California , 2013 .