Preliminary Design Methodology for Hypersonic Engine Flowpaths

A new scramjet engine model, called MASIV, has been developed for control-oriented applications. To reduce computational time, each component models the pertinent physical mechanisms while reducing the spatial dimensionality of the problem. New aspects of MASIV include real-gas dissociation, finite-rate chemistry, a new fuel-air mixing model, an assumed-PDF turbulent combustion model, and interactions of shocks and expansion waves. Strategies for designing 2D scramjet inlets are discussed. One approach is optimize an inlet for a single flight condition. When an inlet designed in this way is at the design condition, all shocks intersect at the cowl leading edge. This optimizes performance at the design condition, but for o-design operation losses are highly sensitive to changes in Mach number and angle of attack. An improved inlet design is described that operates eciently over a range of conditions. In addition, the scramjet combustor also is analyzed to show the eect of pressure distribution on thrust performance for five fuel injection locations. Results suggest general design guidelines, one of which is that injectors should be placed as far upstream as is practical, so that most of the combustion is completed upstream of the nozzle.

[1]  Donald Johnson,et al.  Duel-fuel lifting body configuration development , 1996 .

[2]  N. Peters Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion , 1984 .

[3]  A. Shapiro The dynamics and thermodynamics of compressible fluid flow. , 1953 .

[4]  David K. Schmidt,et al.  Analytical aeropropulsive-aeroelastic hypersonic-vehicle model with dynamic analysis , 1994 .

[5]  Tapabrata Ray,et al.  Robust Design Optimization of Two-Dimensional Scramjet Inlets , 2006 .

[6]  Charles A. Lind,et al.  The effect of shock/shock interactions on the design of hypersonic inlets , 1990 .

[7]  J. Driscoll,et al.  Combustion characteristics of a dual-mode scramjet combustor with cavity flameholder , 2009 .

[8]  Michael A. Bolender,et al.  Hypersonic Vehicle Thrust Sensitivity to Angle of Attack and Mach Number , 2009 .

[9]  Ryan P. Starkey,et al.  Quasi-One-Dimensional High-Speed Engine Model with Finite-Rate Chemistry , 2001 .

[10]  David B. Doman,et al.  A Scramjet Engine Model Including Effects of Precombustion Shocks and Dissociation , 2008 .

[11]  David B. Doman,et al.  Nonlinear Longitudinal Dynamical Model of an Air-Breathing Hypersonic Vehicle , 2007 .

[12]  Michael A. Bolender,et al.  Effects of Improved Propulsion Modelling on the Flight Dynamics of Hypersonic Vehicles , 2008 .

[13]  Sean M. Torrez,et al.  Scramjet Engine Model MASIV: Role of Mixing, Chemistry and Wave Interaction , 2009 .

[14]  Michael K. Smart,et al.  Optimization of Two-Dimensional Scramjet Inlets , 1999 .

[15]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Six-Degree-of-Freedom Simulation of Hypersonic Vehicles , 2009 .

[16]  Ernest F. Hasselbrink,et al.  Transverse jets and jet flames. Part 2. Velocity and OH field imaging , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  Sean M. Torrez,et al.  Heat Release Distribution in a Dual-Mode Scramjet Combustor - Measurements and Modeling , 2009 .