Stirring up Engineers' Systems Intelligence: A Case Study of Life-Philosophical Pedagogy

In their role as problem solvers, engineers are expected to take responsibility for the grand societal challenges that require technical expertise and innovation. This urges them to broaden their horizon from the traditional, deeply technological world view to one that examines the surrounding globe with empathy and social responsibility. Such a call for systems intelligence necessitates a novel approach to engineering education to allow students to practice systemic capabilities. As methodology, life-philosophical pedagogy was experimented with in an English language course that was integrated with the Philosophy and Systems Thinking lecture series. Such pedagogy deviates from conventional methodology in that instead of focusing on correcting deficiencies and filling competence gaps, it takes a midwife approach and recognizes the potential in individuals and delivers the abundance in them. The principles of positive psychology and frameworks of socio-emotive intelligence guide the reflective workout in the course, catalyzing, stimulating and rooting new thinking. Ultimately the course promotes self-growth, intentional change and overall life management, while allowing students to rehearse various interpersonal skills relevant for industrial tasks.

[1]  E. Saarinen Life-Philosophical Lecturing as a Systems-Intelligent Technology of the Self , 2015 .

[2]  R. Bar-On The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI). , 2006, Psicothema.

[3]  Pia Lappalainen,et al.  Socially Competent Leadership - predictors, impacts and skilling in engineering , 2012 .

[4]  Ross A. Thompson,et al.  Socialization of Emotion Regulation in the Family. , 2007 .

[5]  L. Pulkkinen,et al.  Extraversion and Neuroticism as antecedents of emotion regulation and dysregulation in adulthood , 2001 .

[6]  Theodore Laopoulos,et al.  Switching from computer to microcomputer architecture education , 2010 .

[7]  N. Ashkanasy,et al.  What goes around comes around: How meso-level negative emotional contagion can ultimately determine organizational attitudes toward leaders , 2009 .

[8]  Rodrigo Lozano,et al.  Engineering education: environmental and chemical engineering or technology curricula – a European perspective , 2009 .

[9]  R. Boyatzis,et al.  Emotional intelligence competencies in engineer’s effectiveness and engagement , 2017 .

[10]  Zoltán Dörnyei,et al.  The Psychology of Second Language Acquisition , 2008 .

[11]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought‐action repertoires , 2005, Cognition & emotion.

[12]  R. Boyatzis,et al.  PRIMAL LEADERSHIP: THE HIDDEN DRIVER OF GREAT PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[13]  M. Mikulincer,et al.  Predicting employees' satisfaction and burnout from managers' attachment and caregiving orientations , 2012 .

[14]  R. Hämäläinen,et al.  The Originality of Systems Intelligence , 2010 .

[15]  D. Goleman Social Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships , 2006 .

[16]  Dirk Van Rooy,et al.  Performance of student software development teams: the influence of personality and identifying as team members , 2015 .

[17]  Danu Anthony Stinson,et al.  Rewriting the Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of Social Rejection , 2011, Psychological science.

[18]  J. Ellzey,et al.  Teaching ‘community engagement’ in engineering education for international development: Integration of an interdisciplinary social work curriculum , 2015 .

[19]  Manjula Waniganayake,et al.  Pedagogical leadership from a distributed perspective within the context of early childhood education , 2011 .

[20]  Mikael Nederström Personality assessment and self-other rating agreement : moderators and implications of agreement , 2017 .