A population exposure model for particulate matter: case study results for PM2.5 in Philadelphia, PA

A population exposure model for particulate matter (PM), called the Stochastic Human Exposure and Dose Simulation (SHEDS-PM) model, has been developed and applied in a case study of daily PM2.5 exposures for the population living in Philadelphia, PA. SHEDS-PM is a probabilistic model that estimates the population distribution of total PM exposures by randomly sampling from various input distributions. A mass balance equation is used to calculate indoor PM concentrations for the residential microenvironment from ambient outdoor PM concentrations and physical factor data (e.g., air exchange, penetration, deposition), as well as emission strengths for indoor PM sources (e.g., smoking, cooking). PM concentrations in nonresidential microenvironments are calculated using equations developed from regression analysis of available indoor and outdoor measurement data for vehicles, offices, schools, stores, and restaurants/bars. Additional model inputs include demographic data for the population being modeled and human activity pattern data from EPA's Consolidated Human Activity Database (CHAD). Model outputs include distributions of daily total PM exposures in various microenvironments (indoors, in vehicles, outdoors), and the contribution from PM of ambient origin to daily total PM exposures in these microenvironments. SHEDS-PM has been applied to the population of Philadelphia using spatially and temporally interpolated ambient PM2.5 measurements from 1992–1993 and 1990 US Census data for each census tract in Philadelphia. The resulting distributions showed substantial variability in daily total PM2.5 exposures for the population of Philadelphia (median=20 μg/m3; 90th percentile=59 μg/m3). Variability in human activities, and the presence of indoor-residential sources in particular, contributed to the observed variability in total PM2.5 exposures. The uncertainty in the estimated population distribution for total PM2.5 exposures was highest at the upper end of the distribution and revealed the importance of including estimates of input uncertainty in population exposure models. The distributions of daily microenvironmental PM2.5 exposures (exposures due to time spent in various microenvironments) indicated that indoor-residential PM2.5 exposures (median=13 μg/m3) had the greatest influence on total PM2.5 exposures compared to the other microenvironments. The distribution of daily exposures to PM2.5 of ambient origin was less variable across the population than the distribution of daily total PM2.5 exposures (median=7 μg/m3; 90th percentile=18 μg/m3) and similar to the distribution of ambient outdoor PM2.5 concentrations. This result suggests that human activity patterns did not have as strong an influence on ambient PM2.5 exposures as was observed for exposure to other PM2.5 sources. For most of the simulated population, exposure to PM2.5 of ambient origin contributed a significant percent of the daily total PM2.5 exposures (median=37.5%), especially for the segment of the population without exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in the residence (median=46.4%). Development of the SHEDS-PM model using the Philadelphia PM2.5 case study also provided useful insights into the limitations of currently available data for use in population exposure models. In addition, data needs for improving inputs to the SHEDS-PM model, reducing uncertainty and further refinement of the model structure, were identified.

[1]  J. Creason,et al.  The 1998 Baltimore Particulate Matter Epidemiology–Exposure Study: Part 1. Comparison of ambient, residential outdoor, indoor and apartment particulate matter monitoring , 2000, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[2]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Probabilistic Techniques in Exposure Assessment: A Handbook for Dealing with Variability and Uncertainty in Models and Inputs , 1999 .

[3]  Charles Rodes,et al.  Measuring concentrations of selected air pollutants inside California vehicles : final report , 1998 .

[4]  B. Brunekreef,et al.  Personal Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter in Elderly Subjects: Relation between Personal, Indoor, and Outdoor Concentrations , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[5]  Lance Wallace,et al.  VALIDATION OF THE SIMULATION OF HUMAN ACTIVITY AND POLLUTANT EXPOSURE (SHAPE) MODEL USING PAIRED DAYS FROM THE DENVER, CO, CARBON MONOXIDE FIELD STUDY , 1988 .

[6]  THOMAS MCCURDY,et al.  The National Exposure Research Laboratory's Consolidated Human Activity Database* , 2000, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[7]  D. Dockery,et al.  Acute respiratory effects of particulate air pollution. , 1994, Annual review of public health.

[8]  T. Johnson,et al.  Prediction of hourly microenvironmental concentrations of fine particles based on measurements obtained from the Baltimore scripted activity study , 2000, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[9]  J. Xue,et al.  Personal exposure to airborne particles and metals: results from the Particle TEAM study in Riverside, California. , 1996, Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology.

[10]  J. Feldman,et al.  Health, United States, 1993 , 1994 .

[11]  John Burnett,et al.  A methodology to investigate the particulate penetration coefficient through building shell , 1999 .

[12]  David E. Burmaster,et al.  Residential Air Exchange Rates in the United States: Empirical and Estimated Parametric Distributions by Season and Climatic Region , 1995 .

[13]  Tracy L. Thatcher,et al.  Deposition, resuspension, and penetration of particles within a residence , 1995 .

[14]  Suresh H. Moolgavkar,et al.  Air Pollution and Daily Mortality in Philadelphia , 1995, Epidemiology.

[15]  Donald M. Murray,et al.  Residential House and Zone Volumes in the United States: Empirical and Estimated Parametric Distributions , 1997 .

[16]  Lockheed Martin A Multiple-Smoker Model for Predicting Indoor Air Quality in Public Lounges , 1996 .

[17]  G. D. Pfeifer,et al.  Particulate matter and manganese exposures in Toronto, Canada , 1999 .

[18]  Martin Röösli,et al.  Validity of Ambient Levels of Fine Particles as Surrogate for Personal Exposure to Outdoor Air Pollution—Results of the European EXPOLIS-EAS Study (Swiss Center Basel) , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[19]  Ronald W. Williams,et al.  The 1999 Fresno Particulate Matter Exposure Studies: Comparison of Community, Outdoor, and Residential PM Mass Measurements , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[20]  H. Macfarland,et al.  Inhalation toxicology. , 1975, Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

[21]  J D Spengler,et al.  Particle Total Exposure Assessment Methodology (PTEAM) study: distributions of aerosol and elemental concentrations in personal, indoor, and outdoor air samples in a southern California community. , 1993, Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology.

[22]  J. Xue,et al.  Modeled estimates of chlorpyrifos exposure and dose for the Minnesota and Arizona NHEXAS populations* , 2001, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[23]  J. Sarnat,et al.  Assessing the Relationship between Personal Particulate and Gaseous Exposures of Senior Citizens Living in Baltimore, MD , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[24]  Neil E. Klepeis,et al.  Descriptive statistics tables from a detailed analysis of the National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS) data , 1996 .

[25]  J. Creason,et al.  The 1998 Baltimore Particulate Matter Epidemiology–Exposure Study: Part 2. Personal exposure assessment associated with an elderly study population , 2000, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[26]  R. Spear,et al.  Integrating uncertainty and interindividual variability in environmental risk assessment. , 1987, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  W. H. Engelmann,et al.  The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants , 2001, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[28]  P. Koutrakis,et al.  Spatial variation in particulate concentrations within metropolitan Philadelphia , 1996 .

[29]  P. Koutrakis,et al.  Relationships among personal, indoor, and outdoor fine and coarse particle concentrations for individuals with COPD , 2000, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[30]  S L Zeger,et al.  Air pollution and mortality in Philadelphia, 1974-1988. , 1997, American journal of epidemiology.

[31]  C. Pope,et al.  Health effects of particulate air pollution: time for reassessment? , 1995, Environmental health perspectives.

[32]  L. Wallace,et al.  Indoor particles: a review. , 1996, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[33]  T McCurdy Estimating human exposure to selected motor vehicle pollutants using the NEM series of models: lessons to be learned. , 1995, Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology.

[34]  D. Dockery,et al.  A case-crossover analysis of air pollution and mortality in Philadelphia. , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[35]  J. Zidek,et al.  Bayesian Spatial Prediction of Random Space-Time Fields With Application to Mapping PM2.5 Exposure , 2002 .

[36]  Paul Switzer,et al.  Particle Concentrations Inside a Tavern Before and After Prohibition of Smoking: Evaluating the Performance of an Indoor Air Quality Model. , 1996, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[37]  H Ozkaynak,et al.  A population-based exposure model for benzene. , 1995, Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology.

[38]  Paul J. Catalano,et al.  Relative contribution of outdoor and indoor particle sources to indoor concentrations , 2000 .

[39]  J. Xue,et al.  Particle team (pteam) study: Analysis of the data. Final report, Volume 3 , 1996 .

[40]  V G Zartarian,et al.  A modeling framework for estimating children's residential exposure and dose to chlorpyrifos via dermal residue contact and nondietary ingestion. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[41]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Air pollution and daily mortality: a review and meta analysis. , 1994, Environmental research.

[42]  L. E. Sparks,et al.  Penetration of Particles into Buildings and Associated Physical Factors. Part I: Model Development and Computer Simulations , 2001 .

[43]  Yuanzhang Li,et al.  Daily Mortality Analysis by Using Different Regression Models in Philadelphia County, 1973–1990 , 1995 .

[44]  P J Lioy,et al.  Evaluation of a Probabilistic Exposure Model Applied to Carbon Monoxide (pNEM/CO) Using Denver Personal Exposure Monitoring Data. , 1997, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[45]  J Schwartz,et al.  Increased mortality in Philadelphia associated with daily air pollution concentrations. , 1992, The American review of respiratory disease.

[46]  Erik Lebret,et al.  Air Pollution Exposure in European Cities: The "Expolis" Study. , 1998 .

[47]  M. Brauer,et al.  Exposure of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients to Particulate Matter: Relationships between Personal and Ambient Air Concentrations , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[48]  Taylor Ac Using objective and subjective information to develop distributions for probabilistic exposure assessment. , 1993 .

[49]  Debra Walsh,et al.  Use of a Continuous Nephelometer to Measure Personal Exposure to Particles During the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Baltimore and Fresno Panel Studies , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[50]  W. Wilson,et al.  Fine particles and coarse particles: concentration relationships relevant to epidemiologic studies. , 1997, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[51]  M. Katze,et al.  Functional Genomics Highlights Differential Induction of Antiviral Pathways in the Lungs of SARS-CoV–Infected Macaques , 2007, PLoS pathogens.