Major Complications Associated With Xenograft Biologic Mesh Implantation in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

Background. There is limited research for xenograft biologic mesh performance in the setting of infection despite widespread use and significant associated costs. Design. The authors retrospectively reviewed an FDA database for reported xenograft adverse events (AEs). All meshes were used in the setting of abdominal wall reconstruction from 1997 to 2008. Results. The authors identified 150 AEs. Permacol and Collamend comprised 75% (n = 112) of reported cases. Main AEs included acute mechanical failure (42%; n = 63), mesh disintegration (32%; n = 48), and poor mesh integration (13%; n = 20); 80% of cases were described as infected, and nearly 90% of AEs required reoperation. Conclusions . Major complications are reported to the FDA for xenograft biologic meshes. Cross-linked meshes had the most AE reports to the FDA. The intrinsic properties of meshes and how they relate to infection-related outcomes are poorly understood. The findings from this FDA database review point toward a need to carefully evaluate these products.

[1]  W. Helton,et al.  Abdominal wall reconstruction using biological tissue grafts: present status and future opportunities , 2006, Expert review of medical devices.

[2]  J. Deprest,et al.  Comparison of host response to polypropylene and non‐cross‐linked porcine small intestine serosal‐derived collagen implants in a rat model , 2005, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[3]  J. Chaudhuri,et al.  Porcine collagen crosslinking, degradation and its capability for fibroblast adhesion and proliferation , 2004, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[4]  A. Keshishian,et al.  Ventral herniorrhaphy: experience with two different biosynthetic mesh materials, Surgisis and Alloderm , 2006, Hernia.

[5]  J. Varma,et al.  Porcine dermal collagen graft in abdominal-wall reconstruction. , 2002, British journal of plastic surgery.

[6]  J. Shaffer,et al.  Cross-linked acellular porcine dermal collagen implant in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: case-controlled study of operative variables and early complications. , 2005, International surgery.

[7]  Oscar D. Guillamondegui,et al.  Acellular Dermal Allograft for Ventral Hernia Repair in the Compromised Surgical Field , 2006, The American surgeon.

[8]  Christopher J Salgado,et al.  Evaluation of porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) used in abdominal wall reconstruction. , 2009, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[9]  Yen Chang,et al.  Effects of crosslinking degree of an acellular biological tissue on its tissue regeneration pattern. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[10]  R. Kaleya Evaluation of implant/host tissue interactions following intraperitoneal implantation of porcine dermal collagen prosthesis in the rat , 2005, Hernia.

[11]  T. Pappas,et al.  Clinical application of porcine small intestinal submucosa in the management of infected or potentially contaminated abdominal defects , 2007, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[12]  P. Giordano,et al.  Anterior abdominal wall reconstruction with a Permacol implant. , 2006, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[13]  L. Ansaloni,et al.  Use of porcine dermal collagen graft (Permacol) for hernia repair in contaminated fields , 2007, Hernia.

[14]  M. van Griensven,et al.  Adverse effects associated with the use of porcine cross-linked collagen implants in an experimental model of incisional hernia repair. , 2008, The Journal of surgical research.

[15]  Hui Xu,et al.  Host response to implanted porcine-derived biologic materials in a primate model of abdominal wall repair. , 2008, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[16]  E. Vural,et al.  Histological Comparison of Implanted Cadaveric and Porcine Dermal Matrix Grafts , 2007, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[17]  C. Green,et al.  Histological evaluation of Permacol as a subcutaneous implant over a 20-week period in the rat model. , 2005, British journal of plastic surgery.

[18]  A. M. Altizer,et al.  Are Biologic Grafts Effective for Hernia Repair? , 2009, Surgical innovation.

[19]  J. Frizzi,et al.  Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) for abdominal wall reconstruction. , 2006, Current surgery.

[20]  S. Horgan,et al.  Short-term outcomes with small intestinal submucosa for ventral abdominal hernia. , 2005, Archives of surgery.

[21]  J. Delaney,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Four Biologic Prostheses for Ventral Hernia Repair , 2007, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.