Clinical and Pathologic Features of Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women

Objective. To explore the clinical and pathologic differences between vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) in premenopausal and postmenopausal women cared for in a tertiary referral center. Methods. Between January 1997 and June 2008, 145 women received care at our institution for VIN and VIN-associated squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). All patients' demographic characteristics and recurrence histories were recorded throughout the study period and were retrieved retrospectively. Menopausal status was self-reported at the time of initial diagnosis. &khgr;2, odds ratio, and logistic regression analyses were used. Results. The median age was 50 years (range = 19-91 y) with 77% (111/145) of patients white, 20% (29/145) African American, and 3% (5/145) other ethinicity. Sixty percent of patients diagnosed with VIN were current smokers, 18% (26/145) were immunocompromised (positive for human immunodeficiency virus/transplant/steroids), and 30% (44/145) had concomitant or previous lower genital tract dysplasia. Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia or VIN-related cancer recurred in 57 (39%) of 145 patients; of these, 40 (71%) had recurrence of VIN and 18 (29%) had recurrence of cancer. Fifty-one percent (74/145) of patients were menopausal at initial VIN diagnosis. Among women with VIN, the odds of initially presenting with a VIN-related SCC was 3.2 times greater in postmenopausal than in premenopausal women (confidence interval = 1.5-7.1, p < .01), and postmenopausal women were more likely to present with stage II to IV SCC (p = .021). Recurrence risk of SCC, but not VIN, was associated with menopause status (p < .05). Conclusions. Among women with VIN, the risk of SCC is higher in postmenopausal than in premenopausal women both initially and at recurrence. Excisional therapies to identify occult invasion are especially important for postmenopausal women with VIN.

[1]  N. Mulvany,et al.  Differentiated Intraepithelial Neoplasia of the Vulva , 2008, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[2]  J. D. de Hullu,et al.  Review of squamous premalignant vulvar lesions. , 2008, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[3]  P. Judson,et al.  Trends in the Incidence of Invasive and In Situ Vulvar Carcinoma , 2006, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  A. Stewart,et al.  Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Aspects of the Natural History and Outcome in 405 Women , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  A. D. de Craen,et al.  Is the assumed natural history of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia III based on enough evidence? A systematic review of 3322 published patients. , 2005, Gynecologic oncology.

[6]  Edward L Spitznagel,et al.  Prognostic importance of comorbidity in a hospital-based cancer registry. , 2004, JAMA.

[7]  M. Quinn,et al.  VIN 3: a clinicopathologic review , 2002, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[8]  V. Liberis,et al.  Trends in epidemiology of preinvasive and invasive vulvar neoplasias , 2000, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[9]  Bin Yang,et al.  Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia of the simplex (differentiated) type: a clinicopathologic study including analysis of HPV and p53 expression. , 2000, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[10]  A. D. de Craen,et al.  Multifocal vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia grade III and multicentric lower genital tract neoplasia is associated with transcriptionally active human papillomavirus , 1995, Cancer.

[11]  E. Wilkinson,et al.  Unrecognized invasive carcinoma in vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN). , 1988, Gynecologic oncology.