Slow progress on meeting hospital safety standards: learning from the Leapfrog Group's efforts.

In response to the Institute of Medicine's To Err Is Human report on the prevalence of medical errors, the Leapfrog Group, an organization that promotes hospital safety and quality, established a voluntary hospital survey assessing compliance with several safety standards. Using data from the period 2002-07, we conducted the first longitudinal assessment of how hospitals in specific cities and states initially selected by Leapfrog progressed on public reporting and adoption of standards requiring the use of computerized drug order entry and hospital intensivists. Overall, little progress was observed. Reporting rates were unchanged over the study period. Adoption of computerized drug order entry increased from 2.94 percent to 8.13 percent, and intensivist staffing increased from 14.74 percent to 21.40 percent. These findings should not be viewed as an indictment of Leapfrog but may reflect various challenges. For example, hospitals faced no serious threats to their market share if purchasers shifted business away from those that either didn't report data or didn't meet the standards. In the absence of mandatory reporting, policy makers might need to act to address these challenges to ensure improvements in quality.

[1]  A. Localio,et al.  Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. , 2005 .

[2]  E. Oren,et al.  Impact of emerging technologies on medication errors and adverse drug events. , 2003, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[3]  D. Dranove,et al.  Quality Disclosure and Certification: Theory and Practice , 2010 .

[4]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. , 2011, Health affairs.

[5]  R. Kane,et al.  Just what the doctor ordered. Review of the evidence of the impact of computerized physician order entry system on medication errors. , 2007, Health services research.

[6]  Robert M Wachter,et al.  Expected and unanticipated consequences of the quality and information technology revolutions. , 2006, JAMA.

[7]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.

[8]  ELSKE AMMENWERTH,et al.  Review Paper: The Effect of Electronic Prescribing on Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events: A Systematic Review , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  Joan S. Ash,et al.  Research Paper: Types of Unintended Consequences Related to Computerized Provider Order Entry , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  Jill R Horwitz,et al.  U.S. adoption of computerized physician order entry systems. , 2005, Health affairs.

[11]  N. Powe,et al.  Clinical information technologies and inpatient outcomes: a multiple hospital study. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[12]  Y. Han,et al.  Unexpected Increased Mortality After Implementation of a Commercially Sold Computerized Physician Order Entry System , 2005, Pediatrics.

[13]  Arnold Milstein,et al.  Has the leapfrog group had an impact on the health care market? , 2005, Health affairs.

[14]  A. Jha,et al.  Does the Leapfrog program help identify high-quality hospitals? , 2008, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[15]  Melissa M. Honour,et al.  Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals. , 2004, Health affairs.

[16]  J. Christianson,et al.  Hospital Responses to the Leapfrog Group in Local Markets , 2008, Medical care research and review : MCRR.