A comparative study of top British and Chinese international contractors in the global market

While British contractors have one of the longest history and experience in the international construction market, Chinese contractors are relative newcomers where the global market is concerned. This study compares the performance of top British and Chinese contractors based on the OLI+S model, which incorporates the ownership (O), locational(L), internalization (I) and specialty (S) factors. The study suggests that the international involvement of top British contractors has declined from a peak in 1996, while that of the top Chinese contractors has grown steadily since the 1980s. All the OLI+S advantages of top British construction firms were higher than those of their Chinese counterparts even though the number of Chinese construction firms ranked in the top 225 international contractors by the US-based Engineering News Record was higher than that of the British firms. This study further recommends that the internalization and specialty advantages of top British firms and some of the ownership advantages of top Chinese firms may provide them with opportunities to work together in many areas.

[1]  D. Crosthwaite The global construction market: a cross-sectional analysis , 2000 .

[2]  Cliff Wymbs World investment report 2001: Promoting linkages , 2003 .

[3]  Roger Flanagan,et al.  China: Building for Joint Ventures, Second Edition , 1998 .

[4]  Roger C. Harvey,et al.  The Construction Industry of Great Britain , 1993 .

[5]  R. Vernon International investment and international trade in the product cycle , 1966 .

[6]  S. Hymer,et al.  The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment , 1976 .

[7]  Jacquie Cannon Lies and construction statistics , 1994 .

[8]  M. Porter The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[9]  D. Crosthwaite,et al.  The internationalization of British construction companies 1990-96: an empirical analysis , 1998 .

[10]  Lilach Nachum United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD): World Investment Report 2000: Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions and Development United Nations, New York and Geneva 2000. (Biblio Service) , 2001 .

[11]  Tony Walker,et al.  China : building for joint ventures , 1987 .

[12]  Jean Jinghan Chen,et al.  China's Construction Industry and Foreign Investment , 1997 .

[13]  Richard E. Caves,et al.  Causes of Direct Investment: Foreign Firms' Shares in Canadian and United Kingdom Manufacturing Industries , 1974 .

[14]  C. Kindleberger,et al.  American Business Abroad: Six Lectures on Direct Investment. , 1969 .

[15]  Patricia M. Hillebrandt,et al.  The Construction Company in and out of Recession , 1995 .

[16]  R. R. P. Whitelaw Marketing and economics : an introduction to the use of economic indicators , 1969 .

[17]  Les Ruddock Measuring the global construction industry: improving the quality of data , 2002 .

[18]  Ralph Morton,et al.  Construction Uk: Introduction to an Industry , 2002 .

[19]  Lilach Nachum The Origins of the International Competitiveness of Firms: The Impact of Location and Ownership in Professional Service Industries , 1999 .

[20]  D. Crosthwaite The international performance of British construction companies 19901996 , 2000 .

[21]  Low Sui Pheng,et al.  Estimation of international construction performance: analysis at the country level , 2004 .

[22]  Howard Seymour The Multinational Construction Industry , 1987 .

[23]  Daniel P. Sullivan Measuring the Degree of Internationalization of a Firm , 1994 .

[24]  J. Dunning The future of the multinational enterprise , 1974 .