Reduction of attenuation correction artifacts in PET-CT

The conventional approach to attenuation correction in PET-CT, is to derive an attenuation map from the reconstructed high resolution CT image. For that purpose, the CT image is resampled to a lower resolution, the CT-values are converted to attenuation coefficients at 511 keV, and the resulting image is projected to generate the attenuation correction sinograms. In the approach followed here, the PET attenuation image is computed from the raw CT data rather than from the clinical CT-image. The CT data are first reduced to PET resolution and rebinned into parallel hole geometry. This reduced data set can be reconstructed with iterative algorithms in reasonable processing times. Existing algorithms have been combined into a procedure that generates attenuation maps in which the artifacts due to metal implants, oral and intravenous contrasts agents have been reduced. The procedure combines the "projection completion" method with maximum-likelihood reconstruction to suppress metal artifacts. The first evaluation in patients reveals excellent performance. To suppress the influence of intravenous contrast, attenuation values higher than that of water were simply replaced with the attenuation of water. This method was evaluated in seven patient PET-CT studies, each of them consisting of two CT-scans and one PET-scan. One CT scan was acquired before, the other one after administration of the intravenous contrast agent. In these 7 patients, 18 volumes of interest were studied. With the conventional method, the mean difference in standardized uptake value (SUV) produced with the two CT-scans was 3.3%, with a maximum of 11.5%. With the alternative conversion method, this difference was reduced to 1.5%, with a maximum of 8.5%. The comparison of the two CTs also revealed differences due to tissue and patient motion. The SUVs seem to be more affected by this motion than by the IV-contrast.

[1]  Victor J. Sank,et al.  IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION FROM PROJECTIONS: ***I , 1978 .

[2]  Tinsu Pan,et al.  Correction for oral contrast artifacts in CT attenuation-corrected PET images obtained by combined PET/CT. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  W. Kalender,et al.  Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic implants. , 1987 .

[4]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Reduction of metal streak artifacts in X-ray computed tomography using a transmission maximum a posteriori algorithm , 1999 .

[5]  Michel Defrise,et al.  Exact and approximate rebinning algorithms for 3-D PET data , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  M. Defrise,et al.  Iterative reconstruction for helical CT: a simulation study. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  S. Holm,et al.  PET/CT with intravenous contrast can be used for PET attenuation correction in cancer patients , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[8]  K. Herholz,et al.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. , 1999, European journal of cancer.

[9]  H. Herzog,et al.  NEMA NU2-2001 guided performance evaluation of four Siemens ECAT PET scanners , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[10]  Adriaan A. Lammertsma,et al.  Effects of ROI definition and reconstruction method on quantitative outcome and applicability in a response monitoring trial , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[11]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Segmentation-free statistical image reconstruction for polyenergetic x-ray computed tomography with experimental validation , 2003 .

[12]  A.H.R. Lonn Evaluation of method to minimize the effect of X-ray contrast in PET-CT attenuation correction , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[13]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. , 1998, Medical physics.

[14]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Reducing loss of image quality because of the attenuation artifact in uncorrected PET whole-body images. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  An iterative maximum-likelihood polychromatic algorithm for CT , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.