Fuzzy system models combined with nonlinear regression for daily ground-level ozone predictions

Abstract This study focuses on applying a Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy system and a nonlinear regression (NLR) model for ozone predictions in six Kentucky metropolitan areas. The fuzzy “c-means” clustering technique coupled with an optimal output predefuzzification approach (least square method) was used to train the Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy system. The fuzzy system was tuned by specifying the number of rules and the fuzziness factor. The NLR models were based in part on a previously reported, trajectory-based hybrid NLR model that has been used for years for forecasting ground-level ozone in Louisville, KY. The NLR models were each composed of an interactive nonlinear term and several linear terms. Using a common meteorological parameter set as input variables, the NLR models and the Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy systems model exhibited equivalent forecasting performance on test data from 2004. For all 2004 ozone season forecasts for the six metropolitan areas, the mean absolute error was 8.1 ppb for the NLR model and 8.0 ppb for the Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy model. When a nonlinear term (which was part of the NLR model) was included in the fuzzy model, the combined NLR–fuzzy model had slightly better performance than the original NLR model. For all 2004 metropolitan area forecasts, the mean absolute error of the NLR–fuzzy model forecasts was 7.7 ppb. These small differences may be statistically significant, but for practical purposes the performance of the fuzzy models was equivalent to that of the NLR models.

[1]  W. Geoffrey Cobourn,et al.  An enhanced ozone forecasting model using air mass trajectory analysis , 1999 .

[2]  A. Leung,et al.  Prediction of maximum daily ozone level using combined neural network and statistical characteristics. , 2003, Environment international.

[3]  Yoshiteru Nakamori,et al.  A simplified ozone model based on fuzzy rules generation , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  Comparison of neural network models with ARIMA and regression models for prediction of Houston's daily maximum ozone concentrations , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Accounting for meteorological effects in measuring urban ozone levels and trends , 1996 .

[6]  Dong-Sool Kim,et al.  A new method of ozone forecasting using fuzzy expert and neural network systems. , 2004, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  M. C. Hubbard,et al.  A Comparison of Nonlinear Regression and Neural Network Models for Ground-Level Ozone Forecasting , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[8]  A. Comrie Comparing Neural Networks and Regression Models for Ozone Forecasting , 1997 .

[9]  Stephen Yurkovich,et al.  Fuzzy Control , 1997 .

[10]  Scott M. Robeson,et al.  Evaluation and comparison of statistical forecast models for daily maximum ozone concentrations , 1990 .

[11]  Trends in Meteorologically Adjusted Ozone Concentrations in Six Kentucky Metro Areas, 1998–2002 , 2004, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[12]  J. L. Carrasco-Rodriguez,et al.  Effective 1-day ahead prediction of hourly surface ozone concentrations in eastern Spain using linear models and neural networks , 2002 .

[13]  D. Assimacopoulos,et al.  Forecasting Daily Maximum Ozone Concentrations in the Athens Basin , 1999 .

[14]  Yiqiu Lin Development of ozone forecast models for selected Kentucky metropolitan areas. , 2004 .

[15]  Richard G. Lomax Statistical Concepts: A Second Course for Education and the Behavioral Sciences , 1992 .

[16]  G. Spellman An application of artificial neural networks to the prediction of surface ozone concentrations in the United Kingdom , 1999 .

[17]  Aldo Cipriano,et al.  Forecasting ozone daily maximum levels at santiago, chile , 1998 .