Susceptibility of different provenances of Pinus sylvestris, Pinus contorta and Picea abies to Gremmeniella abietina

Summary In a randomized block factorial experiment, 1200 seedlings from four provenances, each of Pinus sylvestris, Pinus contorta and Picea abies were inoculated with conidia (2 × 104 and 1 × 106 conidia/seedling) of Gremmeniella abietina (Brunchorstia pinea), isolated from P. contorta plantations in northern Sweden. A further 600 seedlings were left as controls. The occurrence of symptoms and the extension of dead tissues on the annual shoots were recorded 13 months after inoculation. Only the higher spore dose resulted in significant infection. P. sylvestris and P. contorta seedlings were equally susceptible (53% infected), and significantly more infected than P. abies seedlings (39%). The annual shoots of P. sylvestris and P. abies were affected to 43% and 37% of their length, which was significantly more than 15% of the length of P. Contorta shoots. The frequency of affected seedlings differed between the most southern and northern provenances of P. sylvestris and P. abies, and between the northwestern and the south-eastern provenance of P. contorta Twenty-six months after inoculation, a higher proportion of P. contorta seedlings than P. sylvestris and P. abies seedlings had recovered, and a lower proportion of P. contorta than P. sylvestris and P. abies seedlings had died. This paper discusses why P. sylvestris was found to be more susceptible to G. abietina than P. contorta in this experiment, while the reverse is found in plantations in northern Sweden.

[1]  Per Hansson,et al.  Scleroderris canker on lodgepole pine introduced in northern Sweden , 1994 .

[2]  A. Szmidt,et al.  RAPD variation in Gremmeniella abietina attacking Pinus sylvestris and Pinus contorta in northern Sweden , 1996 .

[3]  C. E. Dorworth.  Influence of Inoculum Concentration on Infection of Red Pine Seedlings byGremmeniella abietina , 1979 .

[4]  D. Karnosky,et al.  In vitro responses of conifer adventitious shoots and calli inoculated with Gremmeniella abietina , 1987 .

[5]  G. Knudsen,et al.  Dose-response relationships of five conifers to infection by conidia of Gremmeniella abietina , 1983 .

[6]  F. Roll‐Hansen,et al.  Scleroderris lagerbergii: Resistance and differences in attack between pine species and provenances , 1972 .

[7]  T. Skrøppa,et al.  Gremmeniella abietina, Phacidium infestans, and other causes of damage in alpine, young pine plantations in Norway , 1992 .

[8]  O. J. Dunn.  Multiple Comparisons among Means , 1961 .

[9]  P. Barklund,et al.  Gremmeniella abietina (Scleroderris lagerbergii), a primary parasite in a Norway spruce die-back , 1981 .

[10]  Christina E. Jonsson,et al.  Survival after planting without soil preparation for pine and spruce seedlings protected from hylobius abietis by physical and chemical shelters , 1995 .

[11]  E. Björkman.  Die Prüfung forstlicher Baumarten auf Resistenz gegen parasitäre Pilze1 , 1972 .

[12]  C. E. Dorworth.  Epiphytology of Scleroderris lagerbergii in a kettle frost pocket. , 1973 .

[13]  Esther Kanzler,et al.  Infektionsversuche mit Ascocalyx abietina und Ascocalyx laricina , 1986 .

[14]  M. Karlman,et al.  Survival, height and health status of 20‐year‐old pinus sylvestris and pinus contorta after different scarification treatments in a harsh boreal climate , 1997 .

[15]  E. Aitken.  Susceptibility of four conifer species to Gremmeniella abietina , 1993 .

[16]  T. Kurkela,et al.  The susceptibility of Scots pine seedlings to Gremmeniella abietina: effect of growth phase, cold and drought stress , 1993 .

[17]  C. Ying,et al.  Effect of geographic variation and jack pine introgression on disease and insect resistance in lodgepole pine , 1996 .

[18]  T. Unestam,et al.  Infection experiments with Gremmeniella abietina on seedlings of Norway spruce and Scots pine , 1988 .