A distinction must be made between the ontogeny and the phylogeny of metabolism in order to understand the mass exponent of energy metabolism.

The discussion on the metabolism/body mass relationship in animals has been complicated, almost from the beginning, by a confusion between intra- and interspecific comparisons of energy metabolism. In this paper I argue that the ontogeny of metabolism is a complex process in which several phases can be distinguished, each with a specific metabolism/body mass relationship. In vertebrates at least the longest of these phases, encompassing the best part of adulthood, appears to follow the 'surface rule' of metabolism. According to this rule aerobic power (En) can be described by the equation En = an X M0.66 in which 'an' is the specific mass coefficient which itself depends on adult body mass according to the equation an = a X M0.09. Since, in a series of related species, the specific mass coefficient, an = En/M0.66, increases with body mass in a systematic manner, it follows that adult metabolism of these species can be described by a second function, E = a X M0.75, in which 'a' is the interspecific mass coefficient (3.34 W in mammals if M is in kg). This function represents the phylogeny of metabolism which can be interpreted only within an evolutionary context and not by introducing new parameters into Rubner's 'surface rule'.

[1]  B. Rensch,et al.  Evolution above the species level , 1959 .

[2]  L. Walford,et al.  Bioenergetics and Growth , 1947 .

[3]  N D NEWELL,et al.  PHYLETIC SIZE INCREASE, AN IMPORTANT TREND ILLUSTRATED BY FOSSIL INVERTEBRATES , 1949, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  S. Hemmingsen,et al.  Energy metabolism as related to body size and respiratory surfaces, and its evolution , 1960 .

[5]  B. McNab,et al.  Food Habits, Energetics, and the Population Biology of Mammals , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[6]  M. Kleiber.  Body size and metabolism , 1932 .

[7]  W. Wieser,et al.  Ammonia production and oxygen consumption during the life cycle of Porcellio scaber (Isopoda, Crustacea) , 1984 .

[8]  John Tyler Bonner,et al.  Size and Cycle , 1965 .

[9]  P. Grant.  Interspecific Competition Among Rodents , 1972 .

[10]  B. Gunther.  Dimensional analysis and theory of biological similarity , 1975 .

[11]  A. Heusner.  Energy metabolism and body size. I. Is the 0.75 mass exponent of Kleiber's equation a statistical artifact? , 1982, Respiration physiology.

[12]  P. Davies.  The ontogenetic weight dependence of metabolism in the florida king snake, Lampropeltis getulus floridana , 1982 .

[13]  E. Cope.  On the Evolution of the Vertebrata, Progressive and Retrogressive , 1885, The American Naturalist.

[14]  M. Kleiber.  Body size and metabolic rate. , 1947, Physiological reviews.

[15]  J J Blum,et al.  On the geometry of four-dimensions and the relationship between metabolism and body mass. , 1977, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  J. Hill,et al.  Heat balance and the metabolic rate of new‐born babies in relation to environmental temperature; and the effect of age and of weight on basal metabolic rate. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  F. T. Jung.  The Fire of Life , 1962 .

[18]  A. Heusner.  Energy metabolism and body size. II. Dimensional analysis and energetic non-similarity. , 1982, Respiration physiology.

[19]  L. Mount,et al.  The relation between body size and maximum and minimum metabolic rates in the new‐born pig , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  H. Feldman,et al.  The 3/4 mass exponent for energy metabolism is not a statistical artifact. , 1983, Respiration physiology.

[21]  R. M. Nally.  An analysis of factors affecting metabolic rates of two species of Ranidella (Anura) , 1981 .

[22]  T. McMahon,et al.  Size and Shape in Biology , 1973, Science.