Estimating the impact of relative expected grade on student evaluations of teachers

Grade inflation over the past few decades has been a concern for many universities. Course evaluation scores are known to be positively correlated with students’ expected grades, and this paper tests whether or not there is an incentive for the instructor to “buy” higher evaluation scores by inflating grades. To test this hypothesis, I use unique data from the University of Washington's Office of Educational Assessment that includes a measure of each student's relative expected grade in the course. I find that there is an incentive for instructors to grade leniently after accounting for the potential endogeneity of the relative expected grade variable due to unobserved teacher productivity and unobserved heterogeneity of instructors and departments. Instructor fixed effects account for a significant part of the measured effect of relative expected grade on evaluations, and by not including them, the estimated impact of relative expected grade on evaluations is biased upwards.

[1]  William E. Becker,et al.  Student performance, attrition, and class size given missing student data , 2001 .

[2]  Rudolph A. White,et al.  Some Evidence on the Variables Associated with Student Evaluations of Teachers , 1976 .

[3]  Mostafa Mehdizadeh,et al.  Loglinear Models and Student Course Evaluations , 1990 .

[4]  Brenda S. Sonner,et al.  A is for “Adjunct”: Examining Grade Inflation in Higher Education , 2000 .

[5]  Anthony C. Krautmann,et al.  Grades and student evaluations of teachers , 1999 .

[6]  John Hattie,et al.  The Relation between Research Productivity and Teaching Effectiveness , 2002 .

[7]  James W. Marlin.  Student Perception of End-of-Course Evaluations , 1987 .

[8]  L. Langbein.  Management by Results: Student Evaluation of Faculty Teaching and the Mis-Measurement of Performance. , 2008 .

[9]  J. Stock,et al.  Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments , 1994 .

[10]  Jeffrey W. Steagall,et al.  Student evaluations of faculty: A new procedure for using aggregate measures of performance , 1995 .

[11]  Hamid Zangenehzadeh.  Grade Inflation: A Way Out , 1988 .

[12]  D. Hamermesh,et al.  Beauty in the Classroom: Professors&Apos; Pulchritude and Putative Pedagogical Productivity , 2003 .

[13]  Jon P. Nelson,et al.  Grade Inflation, Real Income, Simultaneity, and Teaching Evaluations , 1984 .

[14]  R. Sabot,et al.  GRADE INFLATION AND COURSE CHOICE , 1991 .

[15]  Harinder Singh,et al.  Do Higher Grades Lead to Favorable Student Evaluations? , 2005 .

[16]  Clifford Nowell,et al.  I Thought I Got an A! Overconfidence Across the Economics Curriculum , 2007 .

[17]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  Class Size, Students’ Evaluations, and Instructional Effectiveness , 1979 .

[18]  R. Mirus.  Some Implications of Student Evaluation of Teachers , 1973 .

[19]  Lawrence C. Hamilton,et al.  Grades, Class Size, and Faculty Status Predict Teaching Evaluations. , 1980 .

[20]  Donald G. Freeman,et al.  Grade Divergence as a Market Outcome , 1999 .

[21]  Michael A. McPherson.  Determinants of How Students Evaluate Teachers , 2006 .

[22]  Daniel A. Seiver,et al.  Evaluations and Grades: A Simultaneous Framework , 1983 .

[23]  J. Siegfried,et al.  Sample Bias of Unannounced Student Evaluations of Teaching , 1975 .

[24]  Melanie Moore,et al.  Tenure Status and Grading Practices , 1998 .