GEANT4 for breast dosimetry: parameters optimization study

Mean glandular dose (MGD) is the main dosimetric quantity in mammography. MGD evaluation is obtained by multiplying the entrance skin air kerma (ESAK) by normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients. While ESAK is an empirical quantity, DgN coefficients can only be estimated with Monte Carlo (MC) methods. Thus, a MC parameters benchmark is needed for effectively evaluating DgN coefficients. GEANT4 is a MC toolkit suitable for medical purposes that offers to the users several computational choices. In this work we investigate the GEANT4 performances testing the main PhysicsLists for medical applications. Four electromagnetic PhysicsLists were implemented: the linear attenuation coefficients were calculated for breast glandularity 0%, 50%, 100% in the energetic range 8-50 keV and DgN coefficients were evaluated. The results were compared with published data. Fit equations for the estimation of the G-factor parameter, introduced by the literature for converting the dose delivered in the heterogeneous medium to that in the glandular tissue, are proposed and the application of this parameter interaction-by-interaction or retrospectively is discussed. G4EmLivermorePhysicsList shows the best agreement for the linear attenuation coefficients both with theoretical values and published data. Moreover, excellent correlation factor (r2>0.99) is found for the DgN coefficients with the literature. The final goal of this study is to identify, for the first time, a benchmark of parameters that could be useful for future breast dosimetry studies with GEANT4.

[1]  A. Proto Radiology 1999: New Feature—Viewpoint , 1999 .

[2]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. , 2006, Medical physics.

[3]  Giovanni Mettivier,et al.  Investigation of the dose distribution for a cone beam CT system dedicated to breast imaging. , 2013, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[4]  F Levi,et al.  European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2012. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[5]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2014 , 2014, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[6]  J. Boone,et al.  Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment. , 1999, Radiology.

[7]  Andriy I. Bandos,et al.  Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. , 2013, Radiology.

[8]  G. Barnes,et al.  Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography. , 1994, Radiology.

[9]  F Levi,et al.  European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2014. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[10]  T R Nelson,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography. , 2004, Medical physics.

[11]  A. Monfared,et al.  Breast dosimetry in transverse and longitudinal field MRI-Linac radiotherapy systems. , 2015, Medical physics.

[12]  D. Darambara,et al.  Normalized mean glandular dose computation from mammography using GATE: a validation study , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  C. J. Kotre,et al.  Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  R. Subramaniam Science to practice: Molecular targeting with SPECT/CT and MR imaging in oncology--integration of functional and structural imaging. , 2013, Radiology.

[15]  A Mittone,et al.  Radiation dose in breast CT imaging with monochromatic x-rays: simulation study of the influence of energy, composition and thickness , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al.  Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype. , 2010, Medical physics.

[17]  D. Dreossi,et al.  Measurement of the linear attenuation coefficients of breast tissues by synchrotron radiation computed tomography , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  D R Dance,et al.  Estimation of mean glandular dose for contrast enhanced digital mammography: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols. , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Michaela C. C. Weigel,et al.  High-resolution spiral CT of the breast at very low dose: concept and feasibility considerations , 2011, European Radiology.

[20]  Stephen J Glick,et al.  Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for flat-panel CT breast imaging. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. , 1979, Radiology.

[22]  Consumer Protection,et al.  European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[23]  D. Dance,et al.  Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  P. C. Johns,et al.  X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  J. Boone Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data. , 2002, Medical physics.

[26]  D. Dance Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  A. A. Okunade,et al.  Parameters and computer software for the evaluation of mass attenuation and mass energy-absorption coefficients for body tissues and substitutes , 2007, Journal of medical physics.

[28]  K. Amako,et al.  Comparison of Geant4 electromagnetic physics models against the NIST reference data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[29]  Luigi Rigon,et al.  Breast tomography with synchrotron radiation: preliminary results , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  G. Barnes,et al.  Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography. , 1991, Radiology.

[31]  Srinivasan Vedantham,et al.  Personalized estimates of radiation dose from dedicated breast CT in a diagnostic population and comparison with diagnostic mammography , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  R. N. Kulkarni,et al.  Radiation dose to the breast during mammography: a comprehensive, realistic Monte Carlo calculation. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  Frank Verhaegen,et al.  Comparison of TG-43 and TG-186 in breast irradiation using a low energy electronic brachytherapy source. , 2014, Medical physics.