MyPal ADULT study protocol: a randomised clinical trial of the MyPal ePRO-based early palliative care system in adult patients with haematological malignancies

Introduction The systematic collection of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) in the routine care of patients with chronic haematological malignancies such as chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and myelodysplasia syndromes (MDS) can constitute a very ambitious but worthwhile challenge. MyPal is a Horizon 2020 Research & Innovation Action aiming to meet this challenge and foster palliative care for patients with CLL or MDS by leveraging ePRO systems to adapt to the personal needs of patients and caregiver(s). Methods and analysis In this interventional randomised trial, 300 patients with CLL or MDS will be recruited across Europe. Patients will be randomly allocated to early palliative care using the MyPal system (n=150) versus standard care including general palliative care if needed (n=150). Patients in the experimental arm will be given access to the MyPal digital health platform which consists of purposely designed software available on smartphones and/or tablets. The platform entails different functionalities including physical and psychoemotional symptom reporting via regular questionnaire completion, spontaneous self-reporting, motivational messages, medication management and a personalised search engine for health information. Data on patients’ activity (daily steps and sleep quality) will be automatically collected via wearable devices. Ethics and dissemination The integration of ePROs via mobile applications has raised ethical concerns regarding inclusion criteria, information provided to participants, free and voluntary consent, and respect for their autonomy. These have been carefully addressed by a multidisciplinary team. Data processing, dissemination and exploitation of the study findings will take place in full compliance with European Union data protection law. A participatory design was adopted in the development of the digital platform involving focus groups and discussions with patients to identify needs and preferences. The protocol was approved by the ethics committees of San Raffaele (8/2020), Thessaloniki ‘George Papanikolaou’ Hospital (849), Karolinska Institutet (20.10.2020), University General Hospital of Heraklion (07/15.4.2020) and University of Brno (01-120220/EK). Trial registration number NCT04370457.

[1]  S. Payne,et al.  Digitisation and the patient–professional relationship in palliative care , 2020, Palliative medicine.

[2]  S. Stilgenbauer,et al.  Revolution of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Therapy: the Chemo-Free Treatment Paradigm , 2020, Current Oncology Reports.

[3]  M. Hallek Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: 2020 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment , 2019, American journal of hematology.

[4]  Patrick C. Staples,et al.  The HOPE Pilot Study: Harnessing Patient-Reported Outcomes and Biometric Data to Enhance Cancer Care. , 2018, JCO clinical cancer informatics.

[5]  Joseph A Cafazzo,et al.  Implementation and preliminary effectiveness of a real‐time pain management smartphone app for adolescents with cancer: A multicenter pilot clinical study , 2017, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[6]  K. Blomberg,et al.  Early detection and management of symptoms using an interactive smartphone application (Interaktor) during radiotherapy for prostate cancer , 2017, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[7]  M. Vignetti,et al.  Health-related quality of life and symptom assessment in randomized controlled trials of patients with leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes: What have we learned? , 2015, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[8]  Alison Richardson,et al.  Development of a Novel Remote Patient Monitoring System: The Advanced Symptom Management System for Radiotherapy to Improve the Symptom Experience of Patients With Lung Cancer Receiving Radiotherapy , 2015, Cancer nursing.

[9]  F. Mandelli,et al.  Prevalence, severity and correlates of fatigue in newly diagnosed patients with myelodysplastic syndromes , 2015, British journal of haematology.

[10]  Richard Harding,et al.  Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: A systematic review of facilitators and barriers , 2014, Palliative medicine.

[11]  Amy P Abernethy,et al.  Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  U. Germing,et al.  Incidence and prevalence of myelodysplastic syndromes: data from the Düsseldorf MDS-registry. , 2011, Leukemia research.

[13]  D. Niederwieser,et al.  The desire for shared decision making among patients with solid and hematological cancer , 2011, Psycho-oncology.

[14]  J. Efird,et al.  Blocked Randomization with Randomly Selected Block Sizes , 2010, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[15]  A. Mitchell,et al.  Can the Distress Thermometer be improved by additional mood domains? Part I. Initial validation of the Emotion Thermometers tool , 2010, Psycho-oncology.

[16]  D. Catovsky,et al.  Patients’ experience of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: baseline health‐related quality of life results from the LRF CLL4 trial , 2008, British journal of haematology.

[17]  J. Sloan,et al.  Common troublesome symptoms and their impact on quality of life in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): results of a large internet-based survey. , 2008, Leukemia research.

[18]  S. Molica Quality of life in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A neglected issue , 2005, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[19]  I. Higginson,et al.  Development and validation of a core outcome measure for palliative care: the palliative care outcome scale. Palliative Care Core Audit Project Advisory Group. , 1999, Quality in health care : QHC.

[20]  C. Cleeland,et al.  Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. , 1994, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[21]  Eduardo Bruera,et al.  The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): A Simple Method for the Assessment of Palliative Care Patients , 1991, Journal of palliative care.

[22]  S. Malek,et al.  Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia , 2019, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[23]  N. Aaronson,et al.  Phase III study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer satisfaction with cancer care core questionnaire (EORTC PATSAT‐C33) and specific complementary outpatient module (EORTC OUT‐PATSAT7) , 2018, European journal of cancer care.

[24]  D. Dudgeon The Impact of Measuring Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Quality of and Access to Palliative Care. , 2018, Journal of palliative medicine.

[25]  E. Basch,et al.  Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials: Measuring Symptomatic Adverse Events With the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). , 2016, American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting.

[26]  M. Hallek CME Information: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: 2015 Update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment , 2015 .

[27]  C. Gudex,et al.  From translation to version management: a history and review of methods for the cultural adaptation of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire. , 2014, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[28]  I. Higginson,et al.  Outcome measurement in palliative care: The Essentials , 2014 .