The semantic structure of emotion words across languages is consistent with componential appraisal models of emotion

ABSTRACT Appraisal theories of emotion, and particularly the Component Process Model, claim that the different components of the emotion process (action tendencies, physiological reactions, expressions, and feeling experiences) are essentially driven by the results of cognitive appraisals and that the feeling component constitutes a central integration and representation of these processes. Given the complexity of the proposed architecture, comprehensive experimental tests of these predictions are difficult to perform and to date are lacking. Encouraged by the “lexical sedimentation” hypothesis, here we propose an indirect examination of the compatibility of the theoretical assumptions with the semantic structure of a set of major emotion words as measured in a cross-language and cross-cultural study. Specifically, we performed a secondary analysis of the large-scale data set with ratings of affective features covering all components of the emotion process for 24 emotion words in 27 countries, constituting profiles of emotion-specific appraisals, action tendencies, physiological reactions, expressions, and feeling experiences. The results of a series of hierarchical regression analyses to examine the prediction of the theoretical model are highly consistent with the claim that appraisal patterns determine the structure of the response components, which in turn predict central dimensions of the feeling component.

[1]  C. Osgood.  The nature and measurement of meaning. , 1952, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  K. Scherer,et al.  Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook , 2013 .

[3]  Klaus R. Scherer,et al.  The Nature and Dynamics of Relevance and Valence Appraisals: Theoretical Advances and Recent Evidence , 2013 .

[4]  J. Austin,et al.  I.—A Plea for Excuses: The Presidential Address , 1957 .

[5]  A. Manstead,et al.  Social appraisal: the social world as object of and influence on appraisal processes , 2001 .

[6]  K. Scherer,et al.  Emotions in everyday life: probability of occurrence, risk factors, appraisal and reaction patterns , 2004 .

[7]  K. Scherer.  What are emotions? And how can they be measured? , 2005 .

[8]  R. Thayer.  The biopsychology of mood and arousal , 1989 .

[9]  A. Moors.  Theories of emotion causation: A review , 2009 .

[10]  J. Russell.  A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .

[11]  Cliff Goddard,et al.  Universals and variation in the lexicon of mental state concepts , 2010 .

[12]  John Austin,et al.  A plea for excuses , 1971 .

[13]  Fritz Ostendorf,et al.  The lexical approach to personality: A historical review of trait taxonomic research , 1988 .

[14]  J. Russell.  Please Scroll down for Article Cognition & Emotion Emotion, Core Affect, and Psychological Construction , 2022 .

[15]  M. F. Washburn,et al.  Grundriss der Psychologie , 1894, Nature.

[16]  Klaus R. Scherer,et al.  Levels of Valence , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[17]  J. Russell.  Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. , 2003, Psychological review.

[18]  A. Wierzbicka.  Emotions Across Languages And Cultures , 1999 .

[19]  K. Scherer.  Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. , 2001 .

[20]  Craig A. Smith,et al.  Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions , 1993 .

[21]  Zhengdao Ye,et al.  Comparing the Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) approach to emotion and the GRID paradigm , 2013 .

[22]  J. Russell,et al.  Structure of Self-Reported Current Affect: Integration and Beyond , 1999 .

[23]  K. Scherer,et al.  Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. , 2001 .

[24]  P. Ekman,et al.  The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior: Categories, Origins, Usage, and Coding , 1969 .

[25]  K. Scherer,et al.  The World of Emotions is not Two-Dimensional , 2007, Psychological science.

[26]  R. Cattell.  The description of personality: basic traits resolved into clusters. , 1943 .

[27]  Klaus R. Scherer,et al.  Feelings and Emotions: Feelings Integrate the Central Representation of Appraisal-driven Response Organization in Emotion , 2004 .

[28]  J. Pearl,et al.  EIGHT MYTHS ABOUT CAUSALITY AND STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS , 2013 .

[29]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Assumptions in structural equation modeling. , 2012 .

[30]  Klaus R. Scherer,et al.  Facial Expression Is Driven by Appraisal and Generates Appraisal Inference , 2017 .

[31]  Ulf-Dietrich Reips.  Standards for Internet-based experimenting. , 2002, Experimental psychology.

[32]  H. Schlosberg.  The description of facial expressions in terms of two dimensions. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  K. Scherer,et al.  Appraisal processes in emotion. , 2003 .

[35]  K. Scherer.  The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model , 2009 .

[36]  The role of appraisal in emotion , 2013 .

[37]  M. Guha.  The Oxford Companion to Emotion and the Affective Sciences , 2010 .

[38]  R. Littlewood.  Components of Emotional Meaning: A Sourcebook , 2014, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[39]  N. Frijda,et al.  Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness , 1989 .