Automated designation of tie-points for image-to-image coregistration

Image-to-image registration requires identification of common points in both images (image tie-points; ITPs). Here, we describe software implementing an automated, area-based technique for identifying ITPs. The ITP software was designed to follow two strategies: (1) capitalize on human knowledge and pattern-recognition strengths, and (2) favour robustness in many situations over optimal performance in any one situation. We tested the software under several confounding conditions, representing image distortions, inaccurate user input, and changes between images. The software was robust to additive noise, moderate change between images, low levels of image geometric distortion, undocumented rotation, and inaccurate pixel size designation. At higher levels of image geometric distortion, the software was less robust, but such conditions are often visible to the eye. Methods are discussed for adjusting parameters in the ITP software to reduce error under such conditions. For more than 1600 tests, median time needed to identify each ITP was approximately 8 s on a common image-processing computer system. Although correlation-based techniques--such as those implemented in the free software documented here--have been criticized, we suggest that they may, in fact, be quite useful in many situations for users in the remote sensing community.

[1]  Robert A. Schowengerdt.  CHAPTER 9 – Thematic Classification , 1997 .

[2]  Liane S. Guild.  Detection of deforestation and land conversion and estimation of atmosperic emissions and elemental pool losses from biomass burning in Rondônia, Brazil , 2000 .

[3]  W. Cohen,et al.  Integration of lidar and Landsat ETM+ data for estimating and mapping forest canopy height , 2002 .

[4]  Harvey F. Silverman,et al.  A Class of Algorithms for Fast Digital Image Registration , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[5]  P. Meyer.  A Parametric Approach for the Geocoding of Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) Data in Rugged Terrain , 1994 .

[6]  Yi-Hsing Tseng.  Image-to-Image Registration By Matching Area Features Using Fourier Descriptors And NeuralNetworks , 1997 .

[7]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  A contour-based approach to multisensor image registration , 1995, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[8]  Rick L. Lawrence,et al.  Land use and land cover change in the greater yellowstone ecosystem: 1975-1995 , 2003 .

[9]  Robert A. Schowengerdt,et al.  Remote sensing, models, and methods for image processing , 1997 .

[10]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  Registration Techniques for Multisensor Remotely Sensed Imagery , 1996 .

[11]  William K. Pratt,et al.  Correlation Techniques of Image Registration , 1974, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[12]  Ardeshir Goshtasby,et al.  A Region-Based Approach to Digital Image Registration with Subpixel Accuracy , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  A Survey of Approaches to Solving Inverse Problems for Lossless Layered Media Systems , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  R. Bindschadler,et al.  Application of image cross-correlation to the measurement of glacier velocity using satellite image data , 1992 .

[15]  Mengxiang Li,et al.  Hierarchical multipoint matching , 1991 .

[16]  W. Cohen,et al.  Land cover mapping in an agricultural setting using multiseasonal Thematic Mapper data , 2001 .

[17]  Hui.  A Contour-Based Approach to Multisensor Image Registration , 1995 .

[18]  Lisa M. Brown,et al.  A survey of image registration techniques , 1992, CSUR.

[19]  R. Kwok,et al.  Automated Multisensor Registration: Requirements And Techniques , 1990, 10th Annual International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.