Integration of Electricity Markets in Europe: Relevant Issues for Italy

In this paper, we analyze the current trend towards a higher degree of market integration in Europe and identify those aspects that are particularly relevant for Italy. The Italian involvement in this process appears comparatively modest. A welfare analysis, which focuses specifically on the integration of the Italian market, will certainly be a useful support to any policy decision. We argue that, given the peculiarities of the Italian market design, a volume coupling solution could avoid, at the moment, the costs of what could be a significant harmonization effort and, in the end, it might constitute the best short-term strategy. This proposal should be adequately considered, taking into account the complexity of designing an efficient volume-only coordination procedure.

[1]  Tarjei Kristiansen,et al.  An assessment of the Danish–German cross-border auctions , 2007 .

[2]  Kurt Jörnsten,et al.  Benefits from coordinating congestion management—The Nordic power market , 2007 .

[3]  Mathilde Laure Dupuy.  Electricity Markets:Balancing Mechanisms and Congestion Management , 2008 .

[4]  Jean-Michel Glachant,et al.  Nordic congestion's arrangement as a model for Europe? Physical constraints vs. economic incentives , 2005 .

[5]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  The More Cooperation, the More Competition? A Cournot Analysis of the Benefits of Electric Market Coupling , 2005 .

[6]  L. M. Valeri,et al.  Welfare and competition effects of electricity interconnection between Ireland and Great Britain , 2009 .

[7]  Stephen C. Peck,et al.  A market mechanism for electric power transmission , 1996 .

[8]  Andreas Ehrenmann,et al.  A Comparison of Electricity Market Designs in Networks , 2003, Oper. Res..

[9]  F. Schweppe.  Spot Pricing of Electricity , 1988 .

[10]  Tanga McDaniel,et al.  Auctions and trading in energy markets -- an economic analysis , 2002 .

[11]  Bert Willems,et al.  Modeling Cournot Competition in an Electricity Market with Transmission Constraints , 2002 .

[12]  F. Schweppe,et al.  Optimal Pricing in Electrical Networks over Space and Time , 1984 .

[13]  S. Borenstein,et al.  The Competitive Effects of Transmission Capacity in a Deregulated Electricity Industry , 1997 .

[14]  Natalia Fabra,et al.  Designing Electricity Auctions , 2004 .

[15]  D. Newbery,et al.  Allocating Transmission to Mitigate Market Power in Electricity Networks , 2004 .

[16]  B. Willems.  Cournot Competition in the Electricity Market with Transmission Constraints , 2000 .

[17]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Network-constrained Cournot models of liberalized electricity markets: the devil is in the details , 2005 .

[18]  T. Kristiansen.  A preliminary assessment of the market coupling arrangement on the Kontek cable , 2007 .

[19]  Ignacio J. Pérez-Arriaga,et al.  A plausible congestion management scheme for the internal electricity market of the European Union , 2005 .

[20]  J. Lundgren,et al.  Multinational electricity market integration and electricity price dynamics , 2008, 2008 5th International Conference on the European Electricity Market.

[21]  D. Newbery,et al.  Evolution of electricity markets: Does sequencing matter? , 2005 .

[22]  William W. Hogan,et al.  Nodal and Zonal Congestion Management and the Exercise of Market Power , 2000 .

[23]  Ronnie Belmans,et al.  Electricity market integration in Europe , 2009 .

[24]  J. Tirole,et al.  Transmission rights and market power on electric power networks , 1999 .