Back-office intricacy: the description of financial objects in an investment bank

The complexity of contemporary finance translates into what we call the problem of "description": the problem of constructing robust, flexible, portable, and mutually compatible depictions of complex, multisided, and often ambiguous financial objects (products, trades, marketplaces). This problem is characteristically exacerbated in back-office operations within the financial services industry. We provide a case study in the form of a qualitative examination of back- and middle-office operations in an international investment bank. We analyze the manifold manifestations of the problem of description within this bank.

[1]  Andrew D. Brown.  Making sense of the collapse of Barings Bank , 2005 .

[2]  Fabian Muniesa,et al.  Trading-room telephones and the identification of counterparts , 2008 .

[3]  Isabelle Huault,et al.  Market Shaping as an Answer to Ambiguities: The Case of Credit Derivatives , 2009 .

[4]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  Assembling an Economic Actor: The Agencement of a Hedge Fund , 2007 .

[5]  Fabian Muniesa,et al.  Market technologies and the pragmatics of prices , 2007 .

[6]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Commercializing the Back Office at Lloyds of London:: Outsourcing and Strategic Partnerships Revisited , 2004 .

[7]  J. Sharp.  ‘Fortress SA’: Xenophobic violence in South Africa , 2008 .

[8]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  The Finitist Accountant , 2008 .

[9]  Kimberly D. Krawiec.  The Return of the Rogue , 2009 .

[10]  M. Callon,et al.  Economic markets as calculative collective devices , 2005 .

[11]  M. Hossein Safizadeh,et al.  An empirical analysis of financial services processes with a front‐office or back‐office orientation , 2003 .

[12]  François Cooren,et al.  Textual Agency: How Texts Do Things in Organizational Settings , 2004 .

[13]  H. Becker.  How to Find Out How to Do Qualitative Research , 2009 .

[14]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Supporting Articulation Work , 1995, Computerization and Controversy, 2nd Ed..

[15]  I. Greener,et al.  Nick Leeson and the Collapse of Barings Bank: Socio-Technical Networks and the ‘Rogue Trader’ , 2006 .

[16]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[17]  M. Callon,et al.  Peripheral Vision , 2005 .

[18]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[19]  Nikiforos S. Panourgias,et al.  Organised detachment: Clearinghouse mechanisms in financial markets , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[20]  Anthropology in the financial crisis , 2008 .

[21]  P. Quattrone.  Books to be practiced: Memory, the power of the visual, and the success of accounting , 2009 .

[22]  Marc Lenglet.  Aux marges de la triche ? Innovation normative et déontologie financière en salle de marché , 2009 .

[23]  B. Maurer.  Anthropological and accounting knowledge in Islamic banking and finance: Rethinking critical accounts , 2002 .

[24]  M. Power.  The invention of operational risk , 2005 .

[25]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[26]  V. Lépinay.  Parasitic Formulae: The Case of Capital Guarantee Products , 2007 .

[27]  David Stark,et al.  Tools of the trade: the socio-technology of arbitrage in a Wall Street trading room , 2004 .

[28]  Alex Preda,et al.  Socio-Technical Agency in Financial Markets , 2006 .

[29]  Fabian Muniesa.  The description of financial objects: A comment on Hart/Ortiz (AT 24[6]) , 2009 .

[30]  Helga Drummond,et al.  Did Nick Leeson have an accomplice? The role of information technology in the collapse of Barings Bank , 2003, J. Inf. Technol..