Thresholds for the perception of vibration of the back: effect of backrest inclination

Drivers, passengers, and patients in various forms of transport are supported by backrests at angles between the vertical and the horizontal. The effect of backrest inclination on the perception of vibration has not been previously reported, and there are no standardised guidelines that can be used to optimise the design of vehicles or seats so as to minimise the probability of perceiving vibration in these postures. This study was designed to determine the effect of backrest inclination on absolute thresholds for the perception of vibration applied normal to the back (i.e. fore-and-aft vibration with an upright backrest, and vertical vibration with a fully reclined backrest). Thresholds were determined using an up-and-down transformed response (UDTR) method at frequencies from 2.5 to 25 Hz at four backrest angles: 0 (upright), 30, 60 and 90 (recumbent). Inclining the backrest raised thresholds at frequencies between 4 and 8 Hz. It is concluded that the frequency weighting Wc provides a useful prediction of the perception of fore-andaft vibration with an upright backrest. Frequency weightings Wb or Wk might be used to predict the frequency-dependence of vibration perception with inclined backrests, but only at frequencies greater than about 8 Hz.

[1]  Toshisuke Miwa EVALUATION METHODS FOR VIBRATION EFFECT , 1968 .

[2]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Tri-axial forces at the seat and backrest during whole-body fore-and-aft vibration , 2005 .

[3]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Fore-and-aft apparent mass of the back: Nonlinearity and variation with vertical location , 2008 .

[4]  M. Griffin,et al.  Whole-body vibration perception thresholds , 1988 .

[5]  Yoshiharu Yonekawa,et al.  EVALUATION METHODS FOR VIBRATION EFFECT:PART 9. RESPONSE TO SINUSOIDAL VIBRATION AT LYING POSTURE , 1969 .

[6]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  M J Griffin,et al.  The apparent mass of the seated human body: vertical vibration. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Michael J Griffin,et al.  Frequency weightings for fore-and-aft vibration at the back: effect of contact location, contact area, and body posture. , 2010, Industrial health.

[9]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Tri-axial forces at the seat and backrest during whole-body vertical vibration , 2004 .

[10]  K C Parsons,et al.  Vibration and comfort. III. Translational vibration of the feet and back. , 1982, Ergonomics.

[11]  G. B. Wetherill,et al.  SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION. , 1965, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[12]  Michael J Griffin,et al.  Dependence of vibrotactile thresholds on the psychophysical measurement method , 2002, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[13]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Nonlinear dual-axis biodynamic response of the semi-supine human body during vertical whole-body vibration , 2008 .

[14]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  The apparent mass of the seated human body in the fore-and-aft and lateral directions , 1990 .