Toward a multi‐dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior

Individual level innovation studies often assess only one dimension of innovative behavior. As such, they do not sufficiently capture the richness of the construct of individual innovation. Develops and tests a multi‐dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Identifies descriptions of 289 innovation related behaviors and codes these into a hypothesized factor structure consisting of the following five dimensions: opportunity exploration, generativity, formative investigation, championing, and application. Structural equation modeling used on a sample of 225 employees from nine different organizations delivered a relatively poor fit between the hypothesized factor structure and respondents’ job behaviors. However, a single factor measure based on items representing all five factors resulted in an alpha reliability of 0.95 thus supporting a multi‐dimensional conceptualization of innovative behavior in general. Discusses implications for future research.

[1]  R. F. Lovelace,et al.  Stimulating creativity through managerial intervention , 1986 .

[2]  F. Damanpour Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[3]  H. Hurt,et al.  SCALES FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF INNOVATIVENESS , 1977 .

[4]  R. Kanter The Change Masters , 1983 .

[5]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Champions of change: Identifying, understanding, and supporting champions of technological innovations , 1990 .

[6]  M. West,et al.  Innovation at work:psychological perspectives , 1989 .

[7]  G. Wallas The art of thought , 1926 .

[8]  M. Glynn Innovative Genius: A Framework for Relating Individual and Organizational Intelligences to Innovation , 1996 .

[9]  P. Drucker The discipline of innovation. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[10]  G. Graen,et al.  Training in creative problem solving: Effects on ideation and problem finding and solving in an industrial research organization , 1982 .

[11]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Innovations and organizations , 2020, Organizational Innovation.

[12]  S. Scott,et al.  Following the leader in R&D: the joint effect of subordinate problem-solving style and leader-member relations on innovative behavior , 1998 .

[13]  Ronald E. Goldsmith,et al.  Convergent Validity of Four Innovativeness Scales , 1986 .

[14]  T. M. Amabile The social psychology of creativity , 1984 .

[15]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[16]  James C. Anderson,et al.  Improper solutions in the analysis of covariance structures: Their interpretability and a comparison of alternate respecifications , 1987 .

[17]  M. Kirton Adaptors and Innovators: A Description and Measure. , 1976 .

[18]  E. Erikson Identity and the life cycle , 1959 .

[19]  Manfred F. Maute,et al.  Innovation as a socio-political process: An empirical analysis of influence behavior among new product managers , 1994 .

[20]  P. R. Whitfield Creativity in industry , 1975 .

[21]  Heidi Keller,et al.  Innovation and the design of work and learning environments: The concept of exploration in human-computer interaction. , 1990 .

[22]  Judy Pearsall,et al.  The Concise Oxford Dictionary , 1999 .

[23]  Barry M. Staw An evolutionary approach to creativity and innovation. , 1990 .

[24]  S. Scott,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE , 1994 .

[25]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organization , 2000 .

[26]  David J. Gabel,et al.  Pricing of telecommunications services , 1993 .

[27]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations , 1988 .

[28]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Practical Issues in Structural Modeling , 1987 .

[29]  C. Ford A Theory of Individual Creative Action in Multiple Social Domains , 1996 .

[30]  Michael A. West,et al.  A measure of role innovation at work , 1987 .

[31]  T. M. Amabile Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. , 1982 .