Neuromagnetic brain activities associated with perceptual categorization and sound-content incongruency: a comparison between monosyllabic words and pitch names

In human cultures, the perceptual categorization of musical pitches relies on pitch-naming systems. A sung pitch name concurrently holds the information of fundamental frequency and pitch name. These two aspects may be either congruent or incongruent with regard to pitch categorization. The present study aimed to compare the neuromagnetic responses to musical and verbal stimuli for congruency judgments, for example a congruent pair for the pitch C4 sung with the pitch name do in a C-major context (the pitch-semantic task) or for the meaning of a word to match the speaker’s identity (the voice-semantic task). Both the behavioral data and neuromagnetic data showed that congruency detection of the speaker’s identity and word meaning was slower than that of the pitch and pitch name. Congruency effects of musical stimuli revealed that pitch categorization and semantic processing of pitch information were associated with P2m and N400m, respectively. For verbal stimuli, P2m and N400m did not show any congruency effect. In both the pitch-semantic task and the voice-semantic task, we found that incongruent stimuli evoked stronger slow waves with the latency of 500–600 ms than congruent stimuli. These findings shed new light on the neural mechanisms underlying pitch-naming processes.

[1]  H. Kowarzyk Structure and Function. , 1910, Nature.

[2]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[3]  M. Bozkurt,et al.  Functional anatomy. , 1980, Equine veterinary journal.

[4]  M. Bal The effects of language , 1989 .

[5]  Two auditory components in the 130-230 ms range disclosed by their stimulus frequency dependence. , 1994, Neuroreport.

[6]  W. Ritter,et al.  Lexical processing of visually and auditorily presented nouns and verbs: evidence from reaction time and N400 priming data. , 1997, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[7]  W. Fitch Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  H. Mayberg,et al.  An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  K. Miyazaki Interaction in musical-pitch naming and syllable naming : An experiment on a Stroop-like effect in hearing , 2000 .

[10]  R. West,et al.  Effects of task context and fluctuations of attention on neural activity supporting performance of the Stroop task , 2000, Brain Research.

[11]  E Hennighausen,et al.  Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[12]  P. Chauvel,et al.  Neuromagnetic source localization of auditory evoked fields and intracerebral evoked potentials: a comparison of data in the same patients , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Modulation of neural responses to speech by directing attention to voices or verbal content. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[15]  G. Hickok,et al.  Auditory–Motor Interaction Revealed by fMRI: Speech, Music, and Working Memory in Area Spt , 2003 .

[16]  Aniruddh D. Patel,et al.  Language, music, syntax and the brain , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  R. West,et al.  Neural correlates of cognitive control and conflict detection in the Stroop and digit-location tasks , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Progressive decrease of left Heschl gyrus and planum temporale gray matter volume in first-episode schizophrenia: a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study. , 2003, Archives of general psychiatry.

[19]  G. Hickok,et al.  AuditoryMotor Interaction Revealed by fMRI: Speech, Music, and Working Memory in Area Spt , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Antoine J. Shahin,et al.  Enhancement of Neuroplastic P2 and N1c Auditory Evoked Potentials in Musicians , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Adaptation to speaker's voice in right anterior temporal lobe , 2003, Neuroreport.

[22]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Glides in speech fundamental frequency are reflected in the auditory N1m response , 2004, Neuroreport.

[23]  J. Cranford,et al.  Effects of discrimination task difficulty on N1 and P2 components of late auditory evoked potential. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[24]  A. Friederici,et al.  Music, language and meaning: brain signatures of semantic processing , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  J. Grose-Fifer,et al.  Evidence for a New Conceptualization of Semantic Representation in the Left and Right Cerebral Hemispheres , 2004, Cortex.

[26]  D. Bosnyak,et al.  Distributed auditory cortical representations are modified when non-musicians are trained at pitch discrimination with 40 Hz amplitude modulated tones. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  Angela D Friederici,et al.  � Human Brain Mapping 24:11–20(2005) � Voice Perception: Sex, Pitch, and the Right Hemisphere , 2022 .

[28]  Stefan Koelsch,et al.  Interaction between Syntax Processing in Language and in Music: An ERP Study , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  Tsutomu Nakada,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of absolute pitch and relative pitch. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  Antoine J. Shahin,et al.  Modulation of P2 auditory-evoked responses by the spectral complexity of musical sounds , 2005, NeuroReport.

[31]  H. Kolk,et al.  Accessing world knowledge: evidence from N400 and reaction time priming. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[32]  P. Pontes,et al.  Glottic characteristics and voice complaint in the elderly. , 2005, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[33]  Gottfried Schlaug,et al.  Shared and distinct neural correlates of singing and speaking , 2006, NeuroImage.

[34]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Attentional Modulation of Unconscious Automatic Processes: Evidence from Event-related Potentials in a Masked Priming Paradigm , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  S. Kuriki,et al.  Effects of Musical Experience on Different Components of MEG Responses Elicited by Sequential Piano-Tones and Chords , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  When Heuristics Clash with Parsing Routines: ERP Evidence for Conflict Monitoring in Sentence Perception , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Y. Tong,et al.  Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distractor variation on auditory selective attention , 2007, Brain Research.

[38]  Stefan Koelsch,et al.  Comparing the Processing of Music and Language Meaning Using EEG and fMRI Provides Evidence for Similar and Distinct Neural Representations , 2008, PloS one.

[39]  Philip Ball,et al.  Science & Music: Facing the music , 2008, Nature.

[40]  André Brechmann,et al.  Sound level dependence of auditory evoked potentials: simultaneous EEG recording and low-noise fMRI. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[41]  Patrick C M Wong,et al.  Volume of left Heschl's Gyrus and linguistic pitch learning. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  Kayoko Okada,et al.  Area Spt in the Human Planum Temporale Supports Sensory-motor Integration for Speech Processing Establishing the Existence of Distinct Sen- Sory versus Motor Activation Patterns Would Establish That , 2022 .

[43]  Y. Tong,et al.  P2 enhancement from auditory discrimination training is associated with improved reaction times , 2009, Brain Research.

[44]  Hsuan-Chich Chen,et al.  Do position-general radicals have a role to play in processing Chinese characters? , 2009 .

[45]  Jérôme Daltrozzo,et al.  Conceptual Processing in Music as Revealed by N400 Effects on Words and Musical Targets , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  William M. Perlstein,et al.  Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  Nikolai Axmacher,et al.  Activation of the caudal anterior cingulate cortex due to task‐related interference in an auditory Stroop paradigm , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[48]  Antoine J. Shahin,et al.  Auditory training alters the physiological detection of stimulus-specific cues in humans , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[49]  Rutvik H. Desai,et al.  Specialization along the Left Superior Temporal Sulcus for Auditory Categorization , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[50]  James Bartolotti,et al.  Integrating Speech and Iconic Gestures in a Stroop-like Task: Evidence for Automatic Processing , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[51]  Joseph Dien,et al.  Separating the visual sentence N400 effect from the P400 sequential expectancy effect: Cognitive and neuroanatomical implications , 2010, Brain Research.

[52]  C. Muchnik,et al.  Auditory conflict processing: behavioral and electrophysiologic manifestations of the stroop effect. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[53]  Stefan Knecht,et al.  New Names for Known Things: On the Association of Novel Word Forms with Existing Semantic Information , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  Kathy Conklin,et al.  Electrophysiological measures of conflict detection and resolution in the Stroop task , 2011, Brain Research.

[55]  Mireille Besson,et al.  Musicians and the Metric Structure of Words , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[56]  C. Dobel,et al.  Effects of language comprehension on visual processing – MEG dissociates early perceptual and late N400 effects , 2011, Brain and Language.

[57]  Gregory Hickok,et al.  Functional Anatomy of Language and Music Perception: Temporal and Structural Factors Investigated Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[58]  Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al.  Conflicts in language processing: A new perspective on the N400–P600 distinction , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  T. Christensen,et al.  Human Neuroscience , 2011 .

[60]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[61]  Rens Bod,et al.  In Search of Universal Properties of Musical Scales , 2011 .

[62]  Stefan Koelsch,et al.  Effects of Selective Attention on Syntax Processing in Music and Language , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[63]  Stefan Koelsch,et al.  Affective Priming Effects of Musical Sounds on the Processing of Word Meaning , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[64]  G. Schlaug,et al.  Auditory-Motor Mapping Training as an Intervention to Facilitate Speech Output in Non-Verbal Children with Autism: A Proof of Concept Study , 2011, PloS one.

[65]  Avishai Henik,et al.  A unique asymmetrical stroop effect in absolute pitch possessors. , 2012, Experimental psychology.

[66]  Mari Tervaniemi,et al.  Music Training Enhances Rapid Neural Plasticity of N1 and P2 Source Activation for Unattended Sounds , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[67]  A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Differences in word recognition between early bilinguals and monolinguals: Behavioral and ERP evidence , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[68]  Jyh-Horng Chen,et al.  Specialization of the posterior temporal lobes for audio‐motor processing – evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of skilled drummers , 2012, The European journal of neuroscience.

[69]  Giorgio Ganis,et al.  Electrophysiological Potentials Reveal Cortical Mechanisms for Mental Imagery, Mental Simulation, and Grounded (Embodied) Cognition , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[70]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  An Empirical Reevaluation of Absolute Pitch: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Measurements , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[71]  Keiko S. Kamiyama,et al.  Interaction between musical emotion and facial expression as measured by event-related potentials , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[72]  B. Ross,et al.  Plasticity in neuromagnetic cortical responses suggests enhanced auditory object representation , 2013, BMC Neuroscience.

[73]  S. Koelsch,et al.  Auditory stroop and absolute pitch: An fMRI study , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[74]  Giancarlo Valente,et al.  Task-Dependent Decoding of Speaker and Vowel Identity from Auditory Cortical Response Patterns , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[75]  James Kilner,et al.  Observing, Performing, and Understanding Actions: Revisiting the Role of Cortical Motor Areas in Processing of Action Words , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.