Modification of the Local Cubic Law of fracture flow for weak inertia, tortuosity, and roughness

The classical Local Cubic Law (LCL) generally overestimates flow through real fractures. We thus developed and tested a modified LCL (MLCL) which takes into account local tortuosity and roughness, and works across a low range of local Reynolds Numbers. The MLCL is based on (1) modifying the aperture field by orienting it with the flow direction and (2) correcting for local roughness changes associated with local flow expansion/contraction. In order to test the MLCL, we compared it with direct numerical simulations with the Navier-Stokes equations using real and synthetic three-dimensional rough-walled fractures, previous corrected forms of the LCL, and experimental flow tests. The MLCL performed well and the effective errors (δ) in volumetric flow rate range from −3.4% to 13.4% with an arithmetic mean of |δ| ( ) equal to 3.7%. The MLCL is more accurate than previous modifications of the LCL. We also investigated the error associated with applying the Cubic Law (CL) while utilizing modified aperture field. The δ from the CL ranges from −14.2% to 11.2%, with a slightly higher  = 6.1% than the MLCL. The CL with the modified aperture field considering local tortuosity and roughness may also be sufficient for predicting the hydraulic properties of rough fractures.

[1]  Pierre M. Adler,et al.  Permeability of a Single Fracture; Validity of the Reynolds Equation , 1995 .

[2]  Paul W. J. Glover,et al.  Fluid flow through rough fractures in rocks. II: A new matching model for rough rock fractures , 2006 .

[3]  H. Rajaram,et al.  An improved two‐dimensional depth‐integrated flow equation for rough‐walled fractures , 2010 .

[4]  Gudmundur S. Bodvarsson,et al.  Lubrication theory analysis of the permeability of rough-walled fractures , 1991 .

[5]  R. Ketcham,et al.  Three-dimensional measurement of fractures in heterogeneous materials using high-resolution X-ray computed tomography , 2010 .

[6]  Russell L. Detwiler,et al.  Dissolution and deformation in fractured carbonates caused by flow of CO2-rich brine under reservoir conditions , 2013 .

[7]  M. Cardenas,et al.  Non‐Fickian transport through two‐dimensional rough fractures: Assessment and prediction , 2014 .

[8]  D. T. Snow,et al.  Anisotropie Permeability of Fractured Media , 1969 .

[9]  B. Kueper,et al.  Evaluation of cubic law based models describing single‐phase flow through a rough‐walled fracture , 2004 .

[10]  Stephen R. Brown,et al.  Applicability of the Reynolds Equation for modeling fluid flow between rough surfaces , 1995 .

[11]  Harihar Rajaram,et al.  Saturated flow in a single fracture: evaluation of the Reynolds Equation in measured aperture fields , 1999 .

[12]  Robert W. Zimmerman,et al.  The effect of contact area on the permeability of fractures , 1989 .

[13]  Stephen E. Silliman,et al.  An interpretation of the difference between aperture estimates derived from hydraulic and tracer tests in a single fracture , 1989 .

[14]  Richard A. Ketcham,et al.  Effects of inertia and directionality on flow and transport in a rough asymmetric fracture , 2009 .

[15]  J. S. Y. Wang,et al.  Validity of cubic law for fluid flow in a deformable rock fracture. Technical information report No. 23 , 1979 .

[16]  M. Nicholl,et al.  Simulation of flow and transport in a single fracture: Macroscopic effects of underestimating local head loss , 2001 .

[17]  Robert W. Zimmerman,et al.  Fluid flow in rock fractures: From the Navier-Stokes equations to the cubic law , 2013 .

[18]  Stephen R. Brown,et al.  Fluid flow through rock joints: The effect of surface roughness , 1987 .

[19]  Seung Hyun Lee,et al.  Assessment of the validity of Stokes and Reynolds equations for fluid flow through a rough‐walled fracture with flow imaging , 2014 .

[20]  Christopher C. Pain,et al.  Non-linear regimes of fluid flow in rock fractures , 2004 .

[21]  C. C. Pain,et al.  A Simple Model for Deviations from the Cubic Law for a Fracture Undergoing Dilation or Closure , 2003, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[22]  Carl E. Renshaw,et al.  On the relationship between mechanical and hydraulic apertures in rough-walled fractures , 1995 .

[23]  Christopher C. Pain,et al.  Navier-Stokes Simulations of Fluid Flow Through a Rock Fracture , 2013 .

[24]  H. A. Basha,et al.  The fracture flow equation and its perturbation solution , 2003 .

[25]  R. Glass,et al.  Solute transport in variable‐aperture fractures: An investigation of the relative importance of Taylor dispersion and macrodispersion , 2000 .

[26]  David J. Brush,et al.  Fluid flow in synthetic rough‐walled fractures: Navier‐Stokes, Stokes, and local cubic law simulations , 2003 .

[27]  Shemin Ge,et al.  A governing equation for fluid flow in rough fractures , 1997 .

[28]  Richard A. Ketcham,et al.  Navier‐Stokes flow and transport simulations using real fractures shows heavy tailing due to eddies , 2007 .

[29]  Kuldeep Chaudhary,et al.  The role of eddies inside pores in the transition from Darcy to Forchheimer flows , 2011 .

[30]  Stephen R. Brown,et al.  The effect of anisotropic surface roughness on flow and transport in fractures , 1991 .

[31]  Kuldeep Chaudhary,et al.  Pore geometry effects on intrapore viscous to inertial flows and on effective hydraulic parameters , 2013 .