Three Compatible Mechanisms for Representing Medical Context Implicitly

An important aspect of context in medical reasoning is the notion of "variation" of a chunk of knowledge according to various contingencies, such as course of patient's disease, response to therapies, or team specificity. Our position is to represent these variations implicitly, by proposing mechanisms to factor knowledge and to refine it. We propose three mutually compatible mechanisms that effectively contribute to represent slight variations of knowledge in a representation framework integrating object-oriented programming and rule-based programming. We illustrate them with examples extracted from various knowledge bases for the management of mechanical ventilation.

[1]  Phillip M. Yelland.  Experimental Classification Facilities for Smalltalk , 1992, OOPSLA.

[2]  Bernhard Nebel,et al.  Reasoning and Revision in Hybrid Representation Systems , 1990, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[3]  Edward H. Shortlife,et al.  Temporal representation of clinical algorithms using expert-system and database tools. , 1990, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[4]  M Dojat,et al.  A knowledge-based system for assisted ventilation of patients in intensive care units , 1992, International journal of clinical monitoring and computing.

[5]  F Lau,et al.  Formalized decision-support for cardiovascular intensive care. , 1992, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[6]  R. Guha.  Contexts: a formalization and some applications , 1992 .

[7]  Peter F. Patel-Schneider.  Practical, object-based knowledge representation for knowledge-based systems , 1990, Inf. Syst..

[8]  M Dojat,et al.  Evaluation of a knowledge-based system providing ventilatory management and decision for extubation. , 1996, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[9]  François Pachet,et al.  On the Embeddability of Production Rules in Object-Oriented Languages , 1995, J. Object Oriented Program..