A Retrospective Clinical Study: Complications of Totally Implanted Central Venous Access Ports

Background When managing patients who require repeated venous access, gaining a viable intravenous route has been problematic. To improve the situation, various studies on techniques for venous access have been conducted. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical results of complications following totally implanted central venous access port (TICVAP) insertion. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 163 patients, from December 2008 to March 2013. The occurrence of complications was studied in three separate periods of catheter use: the intraoperative period, postoperative period, and period during the treatment. Results A total of 165 cases of TICVAP insertions involving 156 patients were included in the final analysis. There were 35 complications (21%) overall. Among these, 31 cases of complications (19%) occurred during the treatment period and the other 4 cases were intraoperative and postoperative complications (2%). There were no statistically significant differences in age and gender of the patients between the two groups to be risk factors (p=0.147, p=0.08). Past history of chemotherapy, initial laboratory findings, and the locations of TICVAP insertion also showed no statistical significance as risk factors (p>0.05). Conclusion Because the majority of complications occurred after port placement and during treatment, meticulous care and management and appropriate education are necessary when using TICVAPs.

[1]  Yong-Hee Kim,et al.  Primary Ewing's Sarcoma of the Lung , 2014, The Korean journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  K. Yie,et al.  Phlegmasia Cerulea Dolens after Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: What Should We Know , 2014, The Korean journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  L. Rasero,et al.  The late complications of totally implantable central venous access ports: the results from an Italian multicenter prospective observation study. , 2011, European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society.

[4]  C. Fournier,et al.  Totally implantable venous access port systems and risk factors for complications: a one-year prospective study in a cancer centre. , 2011, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[5]  I. Gutierrez,et al.  Exclusion of neutropenic children from implanted central venous catheter placement: impact on early catheter removal. , 2010, Journal of Pediatric Surgery.

[6]  M. Prins,et al.  Risk of thrombosis and infections of central venous catheters and totally implanted access ports in patients treated for cancer. , 2010, Thrombosis research.

[7]  S. Costa,et al.  An 11-year retrospective study of totally implanted central venous access ports: complications and patient satisfaction. , 2009, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[8]  C. Araujo,et al.  A comparative study between two central veins for the introduction of totally implantable venous access devices in 1201 cancer patients. , 2008, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[9]  S. Loibl,et al.  Management of venous port systems in oncology: a review of current evidence. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[10]  D. Hochhauser,et al.  A comparison of Hickman line- and Port-a-Cath-associated complications in patients with solid tumours undergoing chemotherapy. , 2007, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[11]  H. Berkenstadt,et al.  Correct depth of insertion of right internal jugular central venous catheters based on external landmarks: avoiding the right atrium. , 2007, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[12]  Dan M. Kluger,et al.  The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. , 2006, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[13]  V. Kvetan,et al.  The incidence of infectious complications of central venous catheters at the subclavian, internal jugular, and femoral sites in an intensive care unit population* , 2005, Critical care medicine.

[14]  S. Stavropoulos,et al.  Relationship between chest port catheter tip position and port malfunction after interventional radiologic placement. , 2004, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[15]  T. Vesely Central venous catheter tip position: a continuing controversy. , 2003, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[16]  W. L. Scott Central Venous Catheters: An Overview of Food and Drug Administration Activities , 1995 .

[17]  A. Merry,et al.  Depth of Central Venous Catheterization: An Audit of Practice in a Cardiac Surgical Unit , 1994, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[18]  김기봉,et al.  항암 화학 요법을 받는 환자들에서의 중심정맥삽관술 , 1993 .

[19]  J. Niederhuber,et al.  Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to replace external catheters in cancer treatment. , 1982, Surgery.

[20]  B. Scribner,et al.  A silicone rubber atrial catheter for prolonged parenteral alimentation. , 1973, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.