Quick bathymetry mapping of a Roman archaeological site using RTK UAS-based photogrammetry

Recent technological advances are leading numerous researchers and professional users to the adoption of photogrammetric products for a wide range of geoscientific applications. Especially, drone-based Structure-from-Motion (SfM) photogrammetry is often applied as a high-resolution topographic modelling technique with advantages in terms of time and cost when compared to traditional surveying approaches. The aim of this work, carried out within the GeoArchaeo Sites Project, is to investigate the adaptability of drone-based surveys, even with a targetless approach, and to estimate bathymetrical accuracies in shallow waters. The approach was applied on an underwater site to show the potential for the digitalization and monitoring of an archaeological coastal geosystem in central Italy. Specifically, this work has compared the photogrammetric surveying capability of two drones including a Phantom 4 RTK (‘P4RTK’) and a low-cost Mavic Mini 2 (‘MM2’) and an Olympus TG-6 (underwater camera) for a site submerged with a maximum depth of ∼1.6 m. The assessment of the drone SfM-based products was performed through area-based and point-wise comparisons. Specifically, the area-based were assessed through an underwater photogrammetric survey obtained by acquiring images by an operator snorkeling along a portion of the site of interest. The point-wise comparison was performed using data acquired with a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). This study demonstrates that coupling SfM-photogrammetry and UAS-based surveys have potential to define submerged topography. In particular, the imagery acquired with the P4RTK survey can produce dense 3D models of the underwater surface with high resolution (about 0.02 m) and bathymetric measurements with a vertical accuracy ranging between 0.06 and 0.29 m for the area-based and point-wise analysis, respectively. Thus, the approach adopted and tested involving the use of a P4RTK has the potential to reduce constraints and limitations in terms of GCPs distribution and measurement. Also, with such an approach the need for qualified operators for underwater photogrammetric workflow can be avoided.

[1]  P. Mazzanti,et al.  Remote Sensing Monitoring of the Pietrafitta Earth Flows in Southern Italy: An Integrated Approach Based on Multi-Sensor Data , 2023, Remote. Sens..

[2]  F. Bruno,et al.  Assessing Seagrass Restoration Actions through a Micro-Bathymetry Survey Approach (Italy, Mediterranean Sea) , 2022, Water.

[3]  S. Gandolfi,et al.  GNSS and Photogrammetric UAV Derived Data for Coastal Monitoring: A Case of Study in Emilia-Romagna, Italy , 2021, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering.

[4]  M. Ma,et al.  Mapping topo-bathymetry of transparent tufa lakes using UAV-based photogrammetry and RGB imagery , 2021 .

[5]  J. Chandler,et al.  Automated Registration of SfM‐MVS Multitemporal Datasets Using Terrestrial and Oblique Aerial Images , 2021, The Photogrammetric Record.

[6]  David Bienvenido-Huertas,et al.  Validation of Close-Range Photogrammetry for Architectural and Archaeological Heritage: Analysis of Point Density and 3D Mesh Geometry , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[7]  A. Gruen,et al.  MITIGATING IMAGE RESIDUALS SYSTEMATIC PATTERNS IN UNDERWATER PHOTOGRAMMETRY , 2020 .

[8]  M. Viñals,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF RISING SEA LEVELS ON THE CONSERVATION OF ROMAN FISH TANKS IN THE WESTERN MEDITERRANEAN BASIN , 2020 .

[9]  Rudolf Urban,et al.  Evaluation of the Georeferencing Accuracy of a Photogrammetric Model Using a Quadrocopter with Onboard GNSS RTK , 2020, Sensors.

[10]  Dimitrios Skarlatos,et al.  Correcting Image Refraction: Towards Accurate Aerial Image-Based Bathymetry Mapping in Shallow Waters , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[11]  Neil Dixon,et al.  Optimising the quality of an SfM‐MVS slope monitoring system using fixed cameras , 2019, The Photogrammetric Record.

[12]  Gottfried Mandlburger,et al.  Through-Water Dense Image Matching for Shallow Water Bathymetry , 2019, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing.

[13]  Dimitrios Skarlatos,et al.  Shallow Water Bathymetry Mapping from UAV Imagery based on Machine Learning , 2019, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

[14]  L. Guerriero,et al.  Estimation of earth-slide displacement from GPS-based surface-structure geometry reconstruction , 2018, Landslides.

[15]  K. Lambeck,et al.  Tyrrhenian sea level at 2000 BP: evidence from Roman age fish tanks and their geological calibration , 2018, Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali.

[16]  C. Mulsow,et al.  SUBAQUATIC DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS FROM UAV-IMAGERY , 2018, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

[17]  Alessandro Sarretta,et al.  High resolution multibeam and hydrodynamic datasets of tidal channels and inlets of the Venice Lagoon , 2017, Scientific Data.

[18]  Antoine Collin,et al.  Mapping coral reefs using consumer-grade drones and structure from motion photogrammetry techniques , 2017, Coral Reefs.

[19]  J. Dietrich.  Bathymetric Structure‐from‐Motion: extracting shallow stream bathymetry from multi‐view stereo photogrammetry , 2017 .

[20]  M. Dubbini,et al.  Combining nadir and oblique UAV imagery to reconstruct quarry topography: methodology and feasibility analysis , 2017 .

[21]  Alessandro Capra,et al.  ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF UNDERWATER PHOTOGRAMMETRIC THREE DIMENSIONAL MODELLING FOR CORAL REEFS , 2016 .

[22]  Mark W. Smith,et al.  Structure from motion photogrammetry in physical geography , 2016 .

[23]  Scott F. Heron,et al.  Remote Sensing of Coral Reefs for Monitoring and Management: A Review , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[24]  Will Figueira,et al.  Accuracy and Precision of Habitat Structural Complexity Metrics Derived from Underwater Photogrammetry , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[25]  L. Llewellyn,et al.  Getting up close and personal: The need to immerse autonomous vehicles in coral reefs , 2015, OCEANS 2015 - MTS/IEEE Washington.

[26]  Alessandro Capra,et al.  3D RECONSTRUCTION OF AN UNDERWATER ARCHAELOGICAL SITE: COMPARISON BETWEEN LOW COST CAMERAS , 2015 .

[27]  J. Wheaton,et al.  The relationship between particle travel distance and channel morphology: Results from physical models of braided rivers , 2015 .

[28]  F. Visser,et al.  Quantifying submerged fluvial topography using hyperspatial resolution UAS imagery and structure from motion photogrammetry , 2015 .

[29]  K. Lambeck,et al.  Coastal structure, sea-level changes and vertical motion of the land in the Mediterranean , 2014 .

[30]  Carl J. Legleiter,et al.  MAPPING RIVER DEPTH FROM PUBLICLY AVAILABLE AERIAL IMAGES , 2013 .

[31]  D. Lague,et al.  Accurate 3D comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner: Application to the Rangitikei canyon (N-Z) , 2013, 1302.1183.

[32]  Carl J. Legleiter,et al.  Mapping River Bathymetry With a Small Footprint Green LiDAR: Applications and Challenges 1 , 2013 .

[33]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[34]  N. Evelpidou,et al.  Late Holocene Sea Level Reconstructions Based on Observations of Roman Fish Tanks, Tyrrhenian Coast of Italy , 2012 .

[35]  Pierre Drap,et al.  Underwater Photogrammetry for Archaeology , 2012 .

[36]  Paul E. LaRocque,et al.  Meeting the Accuracy Challenge in Airborne Bathymetry , 2000 .

[37]  S. Gandolfi,et al.  Definition of the Local Geoid Undulation Using Non-contemporary GNSS-Levelling Data on Subsidence Area: Application on the Adriatic Coastline , 2021, ASITA.

[38]  F. Chiabrando,et al.  PHOTOGRAMMETRIC UNDERWATER AND UAS SURVEYS OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES: THE CASE STUDY OF THE ROMAN SHIPWRECK OF TORRE SANTA SABINA , 2021 .

[39]  Alessandro Capra,et al.  High accuracy underwater photogrammetric surveying , 2019 .

[40]  Riccardo Barzaghi,et al.  Refining the estimate of the Italian quasi-geoid , 2007 .