The influence of external factors on children's travel mode: A comparison of school trips and non-school trips

Abstract This study examined travel patterns of pupils from four secondary schools in Austria and Germany. Their mobility behavior was examined using a one-week travel diary in a typical school week. This paper examines objective determinants (in particular settlement pattern and trip characteristics) of mode choice. We used a Bayesian approach for nonlinear Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) of binary response variables to assess the effects of external factors on the choice of travel modes. The focus lies on the competitiveness between car and transit. The results indicate that children's modal choices are influenced by trip length and the service quality of motorized modes. A key finding is that school trips and non-school trips are very different. School trips are quite affine to transit even in rural areas, given a sufficient service quality, which can easily be provided by a school bus system. Long school trips increase the frequency of transit use. Non-school trips, however, are much more affine to car ridership, if trip length exceeds the range for walking and cycling.

[1]  Marketta Kyttä,et al.  Physical environmental characteristics promoting independent and active transport to children's meaningful places , 2013 .

[2]  J. Kenworthy,et al.  Dimensions of urban mobility cultures – a comparison of German cities , 2013 .

[3]  Sven Müller,et al.  Travel-to-school mode choice modelling and patterns of school choice in urban areas , 2008 .

[4]  G. Cardon,et al.  Criterion distances and correlates of active transportation to school in Belgian older adolescents , 2010, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[5]  Raktim Mitra,et al.  Independent Mobility and Mode Choice for School Transportation: A Review and Framework for Future Research , 2013 .

[6]  Dominic Stead,et al.  The Relationships between Urban Form and Travel Patterns. An International Review and Evaluation , 2001, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[7]  Raktim Mitra,et al.  Built Environment Correlates of Active School Transportation: Neighborhood and the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem , 2011 .

[8]  R. McKelvey,et al.  A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables , 1975 .

[9]  Rita Cordovil,et al.  Children’s independent mobility in Portugal: effects of urbanization degree and motorized modes of travel , 2014 .

[10]  Aslak Fyhri,et al.  Do organized leisure activities for children encourage car-use? , 2009 .

[11]  Aslak Fyhri,et al.  Children’s independent mobility to school, friends and leisure activities , 2009 .

[12]  Andrew P. Jones,et al.  Environmental determinants of active travel in youth: A review and framework for future research , 2008, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[13]  Xin-Yuan Song,et al.  A Bayesian Approach for Nonlinear Structural Equation Models With Dichotomous Variables Using Logit and Probit Links , 2010 .

[14]  J. Irwin,et al.  The influence of the physical environment and sociodemographic characteristics on children's mode of travel to and from school. , 2009, American journal of public health.

[15]  Sivaramakrishnan Srinivasan,et al.  Modeling children’s school travel mode and parental escort decisions , 2008 .

[16]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis , 2001 .

[17]  K. Pont,et al.  Environmental correlates of children's active transportation: a systematic literature review. , 2009, Health & place.

[18]  C. D. Van Goeverden,et al.  School travel behaviour in the Netherlands and Flanders , 2013 .

[19]  Noreen C. McDonald,et al.  Children’s mode choice for the school trip: the role of distance and school location in walking to school , 2007 .

[20]  Antonio Páez,et al.  Mode choice of university students commuting to school and the role of active travel , 2013 .

[21]  Kevin J. Krizek,et al.  The implications of school choice on travel behavior and environmental emissions , 2007 .

[22]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  Where Do Children Travel to and What Local Opportunities Are Available? The Relationship Between Neighborhood Destinations and Children’s Independent Mobility , 2013 .

[23]  Tracy McMillan,et al.  The relative influence of urban form on a child’s travel mode to school , 2007 .

[24]  Bob Parker,et al.  How do they get there? A spatial analysis of a ‘sprawl school’ in Oregon , 2005 .

[25]  Devajyoti Deka,et al.  An explanation of the relationship between adults’ work trip mode and children’s school trip mode through the Heckman approach , 2013 .

[26]  William H. Greene,et al.  School Location and Student Travel Analysis of Factors Affecting Mode Choice , 2004 .

[27]  Daniel A. Badoe,et al.  Transportation–land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling , 2000 .

[28]  Greet Cardon,et al.  Criterion distances and environmental correlates of active commuting to school in children , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[29]  Marc Schlossberg,et al.  School Trips: Effects of Urban Form and Distance on Travel Mode , 2006 .

[30]  A. Dannenberg,et al.  Walking and cycling to health: a comparative analysis of city, state, and international data. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[31]  Roger Mackett,et al.  Children's travel behaviour and its health implications , 2013 .

[32]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  Personal, family, social, and environmental correlates of active commuting to school. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[33]  A. Flade,et al.  Das Hineinwachsen in die motorisierte Gesellschaft , 1999 .

[34]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment , 2010 .