Applying a Cognitive-Processing Model to Presidential Debate Effects: Postdebate News Analysis and Primed Reflection

This article integrates priming and framing into a cognitive-processing model that illustrates how the effects of watching a presidential debate might be influenced by a priming message as it interacts with an individual’s schema. We examine how the frame of postdebate news analysis primes audience reflection on a previously viewed segment from the 2004 presidential debates (a process we identify as ‘‘primed reflection’’). Results show that the influence of postdebate news analysis is a function of the interaction between the news-analysis frame (policy vs. performance) and the individual-level factors, namely, political knowledge and propensity to reflect on media content.

[1]  Scott Fricker,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Web and Telephone Surveys , 2005 .

[2]  J. Bruner.  On perceptual readiness. , 1957, Psychological review.

[3]  H. Kelley,et al.  Communication And Persuasion , 1953 .

[4]  Ann N. Crigler,et al.  Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning. , 1993 .

[5]  M. L. Snyder,et al.  Poor performance following unsolvable problems: Learned helplessness or egotism? , 1978 .

[6]  Mike Schmierbach,et al.  The Interplay of News Frames on Cognitive Complexity , 2004 .

[7]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens Are Guided by a Trusted Source , 2000 .

[8]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Stalking the elusive "vividness" effect. , 1982 .

[9]  William L. Benoit,et al.  Presidential Debate Watching, Issue Knowledge, Character Evaluation, and Vote Choice , 2004 .

[10]  W. Mcguire,et al.  PERSISTENCE OF INDUCED OPINION CHANGE AND RETENTION OF THE INDUCING MESSAGE CONTENTS. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[11]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  Knowledge accessibility and activation: Subjectivity and suffering from unconscious sources. , 1989 .

[12]  K. Mcgraw,et al.  Media Priming of Presidential and Group Evaluations , 2003 .

[13]  Ann N. Crigler.  The Psychology of Political Communication , 1996 .

[14]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social cognition, 2nd ed. , 1991 .

[15]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Personifying the Radical: How News Framing Polarizes Security Concerns and Tolerance Judgments. , 2005 .

[16]  John R. Anderson.  A Spreading Activation Theory of Memory , 1988 .

[17]  H. Gerard,et al.  Attributed intentions and informational selectivity , 1974 .

[18]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[19]  S. Iyengar.  Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. , 1991 .

[20]  Michael Elwood Roloff,et al.  Persuasion : new directions in theory and research , 1980 .

[21]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[22]  Thomas E. Nelson,et al.  Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance , 1997, American Political Science Review.

[23]  Laura A. Brannon,et al.  The Media and the Foundations of Presidential Support: George Bush and the Persian Gulf Conflict , 1993 .

[24]  E. Higgins,et al.  Accessibility and Applicability: Some "Activation Rules" Influencing Judgment , 1995 .

[25]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Altering the Foundations of Support for the President Through Priming , 1990 .

[26]  Michael D. Kaplowitz,et al.  A Comparison of Web and Mail Survey Response Rates , 2004 .

[27]  T. Levine,et al.  Eta Squared, Partial Eta Squared, and Misreporting of Effect Size in Communication Research , 2002 .

[28]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm , 1993 .

[29]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Understanding Deliberation , 1999 .

[30]  E. Higgins.  Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. , 1996 .

[31]  William P. Eveland.  The Cognitive Mediation Model of Learning From the News , 2001, Commun. Res..

[32]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Cue Convergence , 2006, Commun. Res..

[33]  Fuyuan Shen.  Chronic Accessibility and Individual Cognitions: Examining the Effects of Message Frames in Political Advertisements , 2004 .

[34]  A. Oberschall,et al.  The Whole World Is Watching , 1980 .

[35]  J. Zaller,et al.  The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion: Preface , 1992 .

[36]  S. Iyengar,et al.  The evening news and presidential evaluations , 1984 .

[37]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  MEDIA PRIMING EFFECTS: ACCESSIBILITY, ASSOCIATION, AND ACTIVATION , 1998 .

[38]  Wafburm.  RESEARCH IN POLITICAL SOCIOLOGY , 1995 .

[39]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  “To Thine Own Self Be True” , 1996, Communication Research.

[40]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[41]  W. Gamson,et al.  The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action , 1987 .

[42]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  How the Media Affect What People Think: An Information Processing Approach , 1989, The Journal of Politics.

[43]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Framing as a theory of media effects , 1999 .

[44]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[45]  T. K. Srull,et al.  The Role of Category Accessibility in the Interpretation of Information About Persons: Some Determinants and Implications , 1979 .

[46]  S. Fulero,et al.  Recall for confirming events: Memory processes and the maintenance of social stereotypes ☆ , 1979 .

[47]  Michael Pfau,et al.  The Subtle Nature of Presidential Debate Influence , 2002 .

[48]  Karl Haberlandt,et al.  Cognitive psychology, 2nd ed. , 1997 .

[49]  James N. Druckman,et al.  Priming the Vote: Campaign Effects in a U.S. Senate Election , 2004 .

[50]  Kathleen E. Kendall.  Presidential Debates Through Media Eyes , 1997 .

[51]  J. Krosnick,et al.  NewsMedia Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: A Program of Research on the Priming Hypothesis , 1996 .

[52]  S. Kraus,et al.  Mass communication and political information processing , 1990 .

[53]  Olivier A. Bauchau,et al.  Modeling of unilateral contact conditions with application to aerospace systems involving backlash, freeplay and friction , 2001 .

[54]  K. Bussey,et al.  The social learning theory of sex differences: Imitation is alive and well. , 1979 .

[55]  D. Scheufele.  Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing Revisited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Political Communication , 2000 .

[56]  D. J. Lanoue,et al.  ONE THAT MADE A DIFFERENCE: COGNITIVE CONSISTENCY, POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, AND THE 1980 PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE , 1992 .

[57]  James B. Lemert.  News Verdicts, the Debates, and Presidential Campaigns: , 1991 .

[58]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  Political persuasion and attitude change , 1996 .

[59]  Gerald M. Kosicki,et al.  Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse , 1993 .

[60]  M. Snyder,et al.  Reconstructing the Past: Some Cognitive Consequences of Person Perception , 1978 .