The Tesla valve is a passive-type check valve used for flow control in micro- or minichannel systems for a variety of applications. Although the design and effectiveness of a singular Tesla valve is somewhat well understood, the effects of using multiple, identically shaped Tesla valves in series—forming a multistaged Tesla valve (MSTV)—have not been well documented in the open literature. Therefore, using high-performance computing (HPC) and three-dimensional (3D) computational fluid dynamics (CFD), the effectiveness of an MSTV using Tesla valves with preoptimized designs was quantified in terms of diodicity for laminar flow conditions. The number of Tesla valves/stages (up to 20), valve-to-valve distance (up to 3.375 hydraulic diameters), and Reynolds number (up to 200) was varied to determine their effect on MSTV diodicity. Results clearly indicate that the MSTV provides for a significantly higher diodicity than a single Tesla valve and that this difference increases with Reynolds number. Minimizing the distance between adjacent Tesla valves can significantly increase the MSTV diodicity, however, for very low Reynolds number (Re < 50), the MSTV diodicity is almost independent of valve-to-valve distance and number of valves used. In general, more Tesla valves are required to maximize the MSTV diodicity as the Reynolds number increases. Using data-fitting procedures, a correlation for predicting the MSTV diodicity was developed and shown to be in a power-law form. It is further concluded that 3D CFD more accurately simulates the flow within the Tesla valve over a wider range of Reynolds numbers than 2D simulations that are more commonly reported in the literature. This is supported by demonstrating secondary flow patterns in the Tesla valve outlet that become stronger as Reynolds number increases. Plots of the pressure and velocity fields in various MSTVs are provided to fully document the complex physics of the flow field.
[1]
Chien-Hsiung Tsai,et al.
High-performance microfluidic rectifier based on sudden expansion channel with embedded block structure.
,
2012,
Biomicrofluidics.
[2]
M. Krafczyk,et al.
The effect of the microfluidic diodicity on the efficiency of valve-less rectification micropumps using Lattice Boltzmann Method
,
2009
.
[3]
Martin A. Afromowitz,et al.
DESIGN, FABRICATION AND TESTING OF FIXED-VALVE MICRO-PUMPS
,
1995
.
[4]
G. Stemme,et al.
A valveless diffuser/nozzle-based fluid pump
,
1993
.
[5]
C. Rhie,et al.
Numerical Study of the Turbulent Flow Past an Airfoil with Trailing Edge Separation
,
1983
.
[6]
Christopher J. Morris,et al.
Improvements in Fixed-Valve Micropump Performance Through Shape Optimization of Valves
,
2005
.
[7]
Ebrahim Shirani,et al.
Numerical Investigation on the Effect of the Size and Number of Stages on the Tesla Microvalve Efficiency
,
2013
.
[8]
Scott M. Thompson,et al.
Investigation of a flat-plate oscillating heat pipe with Tesla-type check valves
,
2011
.
[9]
Kent Robertson Van Horn,et al.
Design and application
,
1967
.
[10]
Nguyen N-T.,et al.
Simulation and Optimization of Tesla Valves
,
2003
.
[11]
S. Zhang,et al.
Performance Simulations of Tesla Microfluidic Valves
,
2007
.
[12]
Timothy J. Barth,et al.
The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes
,
1989
.
[13]
Torsten Gerlach.
Microdiffusers as dynamic passive valves for micropump applications
,
1998
.
[14]
Katja Bachmeier,et al.
Numerical Heat Transfer And Fluid Flow
,
2016
.