Do Environmental Management Systems Improve Business Performance in an International Setting?

With the worldwide increase in the adoption of environmental management systems (EMSs), some research has emerged that evaluates the reasons why facilities adopt them. However, there is little information about how these motivations extend to different international settings, and the link between the comprehensiveness of an EMS and business performance has yet to be demonstrated. While both institutional pressures and resources and capabilities may encourage EMS adoption and improved business performance, questions remain about whether organizations that are motivated mainly by their resources and capabilities benefit to the same extent as organizations that are driven to adopt an EMS mainly because of institutional pressures. We analyze these relationships using OECD survey data from manufacturing facilities operating in Canada, Germany, Hungary, and the United States. Our results show that facilities that are motivated to adopt more comprehensive EMSs because of their complementary resources and capabilities, such as export orientation, employee commitment and environmental R&D, (as opposed to institutional pressures) observe greater overall facility-level business performance.

[1]  R. Calantone,et al.  Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance , 2003 .

[2]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[3]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION AND CHANGE: ENVIRONMENTALISM AND THE US CHEMICAL INDUSTRY , 1999 .

[4]  Perry Sadorsky,et al.  The Determinants of an Environmentally Responsive Firm: An Empirical Approach , 1996 .

[5]  R. Klassen,et al.  The Impact of Environmental Technologies on Manufacturing Performance , 1999 .

[6]  Sten Jönsson.  Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[7]  W. Davidson,et al.  Regulatory Pressure and Environmental Management Infrastructure and Practices , 2001 .

[8]  A. Campbell,et al.  Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantage , 1995 .

[9]  G. Boyce,et al.  Social accounting for sufficiency: Buddhist principles and practices, and their application in Thailand , 2009 .

[10]  Rebecca Henderson.  THE INTERACTIONS OF ORGANIZATIONAL AND COMPETITIVE INFLUENCES ON STRATEGY AND.. , 1997 .

[11]  R. Klassen,et al.  The impact of environmental management on firm performance , 1996 .

[12]  Jennifer Nash,et al.  CODES OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICE: Assessing Their Potential as a Tool for Change , 1997 .

[13]  Institutions and Organizations. , 1997 .

[14]  Sanjay Sharma.  Managerial Interpretations and Organizational Context as Predictors of Corporate Choice of Environmental Strategy , 2000 .

[15]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Greener manufacturing and operations : from design to delivery and back /ed. by Joseph Sarkis , 2002 .

[16]  A. Prakash,et al.  Green by Choice?: Cross-National Variations in Firms' Responses to EMS-Based Environmental Regimes , 2001 .

[17]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  The relationship between ISO 14001 and continuous source reduction programs , 2000 .

[18]  Stuart L. Hart,et al.  DOES IT PAY TO BE GREEN? AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMISSION REDUCTION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE , 1996 .

[19]  Michael J. Lenox,et al.  Industry Self-Regulation Without Sanctions: The Chemical Industry's Responsible Care Program , 2000 .

[20]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[21]  Carolyn P. Egri,et al.  Leadership in the North American Environmental Sector: Values, Leadership Styles, and Contexts of Environmental Leaders and their Organizations , 2000 .

[22]  D. Norman,et al.  Environmental Management Systems: Do They Improve Performance? , 2003 .

[23]  Stephen M. Shortell,et al.  Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder: The Impact of Organizational Identification, Identity, and Image on the Cooperative Behaviors of Physicians , 2002 .

[24]  Madhu Khanna,et al.  EPA's Voluntary 33/50 Program: Impact on Toxic Releases and Economic Performance of Firms , 1999 .

[25]  Shameek Konar,et al.  Information As Regulation: The Effect of Community Right to Know Laws on Toxic Emissions , 1997 .

[26]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[27]  Nicole Darnall.  Why Firms Mandate ISO 14001 Certification , 2006 .

[28]  Nicole Darnall,et al.  Predicting the Cost of Environmental Management System Adoption: The Role of Capabilities, Resources and Ownership Structure , 2006 .

[29]  G. Christainsen,et al.  The contribution of environmental regulations to the slowdown in productivity growth , 1981 .

[30]  M. Toffel,et al.  Stakeholders and Environmental Management Practices: An Institutional Framework , 2004 .

[31]  H. R. Fogler,et al.  A Note on Social Responsibility and Stock Valuation , 1975 .

[32]  Madhu Khanna,et al.  Incentives for Environmental Self-Regulation and Implications for Environmental Performance , 2004 .

[33]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[34]  Michael J. Lenox,et al.  The Strategic Use of Decentralized Institutions: Exploring Certification With the ISO 14001 Management Standard , 2005 .

[35]  J. Hardin,et al.  Generalized Linear Models and Extensions , 2001 .

[36]  J. M. Macpherson,et al.  Global Competition, Institutions, and the Diffusion of Organizational Practices: The International Spread of ISO 9000 Quality Certificates , 2002 .

[37]  C. Oliver.  SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: COMBINING INSTITUTIONAL AND RESOURCE- BASED VIEWS , 1997 .

[38]  P. Shrivastava.  Ecocentric Management for a Risk Society , 1995 .

[39]  Urmila Jha Thakur,et al.  Environmental management systems , 2007 .

[40]  Pratima Bansal,et al.  Strategic Explanations for the Early Adoption of ISO 14001 , 2003 .

[41]  Klaus Conrad,et al.  The Impact of Pollution Abatement Investment on Productivity Change: Anempirical Comparison of the U.S., Germany, and Canada , 1985 .

[42]  Sarah D. Stanwick,et al.  CEO compensation: does it pay to be green? , 2001 .

[43]  V. Pucik,et al.  Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value , 2005 .

[44]  S. Hart.  A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[45]  Peter E. Kennedy.  A Guide to Econometrics , 1979 .

[46]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[47]  M. Khanna,et al.  Corporate Environmental Management: Regulatory and Market-Based Incentives , 2002, Land Economics.

[48]  Jorge Rivera,et al.  Assessing a voluntary environmental initiative in the developing world: The Costa Rican Certification for Sustainable Tourism , 2006 .

[49]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  A review of environmentally conscious manufacturing theory and practices , 1994 .

[50]  A. Hoffman.  Linking Organizational and Field-Level Analyses , 2001 .

[51]  R. J. Crawford,et al.  Competitive Environmental Strategy: A Guide to the Changing Business Landscape , 2002 .

[52]  Nicole Darnall,et al.  Iso 14001: Greening Management Systems , 2007 .

[53]  Nicole Darnall,et al.  Motivations for Participating in a Voluntary Environmental Initiative: The Multi-State Working Group and EPA's EMS Pilot Program , 2007 .

[54]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Effects of International Diversity and Product Diversity on the Performance of Multinational Firms , 1996 .

[55]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[56]  C. Oliver.  The Influence of Institutional and Task Environment Relationships on Organizational Performance: The Canadian Construction Industry , 1997 .

[57]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities , 1998 .

[58]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  Adoption and maintenance of environmental management systems: Critical success factors , 2004 .

[59]  Ilan Vertinsky,et al.  Why Japanese Firms Choose to Certify: A Study of Managerial Responses to Environmental Issues , 2001 .

[60]  M. Lenox,et al.  WHO ADOPTS MANAGEMENT STANDARDS EARLY? AN EXAMINATION OF ISO 14001 CERTIFICATIONS. , 2001 .

[61]  Mark Cordano,et al.  Pollution Reduction Preferences of U.S. Environmental Managers: Applying Ajzen'S Theory of Planned Behavior , 2000 .

[62]  T. Gladwin,et al.  Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research , 1995 .

[63]  Justin Tan,et al.  Organizational Slack and Firm Performance During Economic Transitions: Two Studies from an Emerging Economy , 2003 .

[64]  Charles J. Corbett,et al.  The Financial Impact of ISO 9000 Certification in the United States: An Empirical Analysis , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[65]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[66]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[67]  Stuart L. Hart,et al.  From Heresy to Dogma: An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism , 1997 .

[68]  Petra Christmann.  Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets , 2000 .

[69]  M. Falk.  Endogenous organizational change and the expected demand for different skill groups , 2002 .

[70]  Kendall Roth,et al.  Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness , 2000 .

[71]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge.  Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[72]  Dennis A. Rondinelli,et al.  Environmental citizenship in multinational corporations: social responsibility and sustainable development , 2000 .

[73]  David L. Levy.  The environmental practices and performance of transnational corporations , 1995 .

[74]  Kendall Roth,et al.  Managing international interdependence: CEO characteristics in a resource-based framework , 1995 .

[75]  A. Prakash,et al.  Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities' environmental performance , 2005 .

[76]  Iain J. Clelland,et al.  Talking Trash: Legitimacy, Impression Management, and Unsystematic Risk in the Context of the Natural Environment , 2004 .

[77]  Cary Coglianese,et al.  Regulating from the inside , 2001 .

[78]  Barbara Gray,et al.  Testing a Model of Organizational Response to Social and Political Issues , 1994 .

[79]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  A Contingent Resource-Based View of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy , 2003 .

[80]  P. Bansal.  Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development , 2005 .

[81]  Aseem Prakash,et al.  Green Clubs and Voluntary Governance: ISO 14001 and Firms' Regulatory Compliance , 2005 .

[82]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .

[83]  John Darabaris,et al.  Corporate Environmental Management , 2007 .

[84]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  From Heresy to Dogma: An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism , 1999 .

[85]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[86]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  Organizations, policy, and the natural environment , 2002 .

[87]  C. Perrow.  Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay , 1975 .

[88]  D. Pujari,et al.  Green and competitive: Influences on environmental new product development performance , 2003 .

[89]  M. E. Marshall,et al.  Environmental training: It's good business , 1992 .

[90]  Perry Sadorsky,et al.  The Relationship Between Environmental Commitment and Managerial Perceptions of Stakeholder Importance , 1999 .