Sex differences in virtual navigation influenced by scale and navigation experience

The Morris water maze is a spatial abilities test adapted from the animal spatial cognition literature and has been studied in the context of sex differences in humans. This is because its standard design, which manipulates proximal (close) and distal (far) cues, applies to human navigation. However, virtual Morris water mazes test navigation skills on a scale that is vastly smaller than natural human navigation. Many researchers have argued that navigating in large and small scales is fundamentally different, and small-scale navigation might not simulate natural human navigation. Other work has suggested that navigation experience could influence spatial skills. To address the question of how individual differences influence navigational abilities in differently scaled environments, we employed both a large- (146.4 m in diameter) and a traditional- (36.6 m in diameter) scaled virtual Morris water maze along with a novel measure of navigation experience (lifetime mobility). We found sex differences on the small maze in the distal cue condition only, but in both cue-conditions on the large maze. Also, individual differences in navigation experience modulated navigation performance on the virtual water maze, showing that higher mobility was related to better performance with proximal cues for only females on the small maze, but for both males and females on the large maze.

[1]  R. Morris Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat , 1984, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  Anthony E. Richardson,et al.  Spatial abilities at different scales: Individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning , 2006 .

[3]  S. Huettel,et al.  Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  B. Hewlett,et al.  Reproductive Interests and Forager Mobility1 , 1999, Current Anthropology.

[5]  V. Braithwaite,et al.  The evolution of sex differences in spatial ability. , 2003, Behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  Jean Choi,et al.  Sex-Specific Relationships Between Route-Learning Strategies and Abilities in a Large-Scale Environment , 2006 .

[7]  Tobias Meilinger,et al.  Local and Global Reference Frames for Environmental Spaces , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  The spatial brain. , 2004, Neuropsychology.

[9]  C. Lawton Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety , 1994 .

[10]  L. Nadel,et al.  The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1978 .

[11]  E. Cashdan,et al.  Spatial cognition, mobility, and reproductive success in northwestern Namibia , 2015 .

[12]  J. Knierim,et al.  Framing spatial cognition: neural representations of proximal and distal frames of reference and their roles in navigation. , 2011, Physiological reviews.

[13]  R. Sutherland,et al.  A characterization of performance by men and women in a virtual Morris water task: A large and reliable sex difference , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[14]  Thomas Wolbers,et al.  Challenges for identifying the neural mechanisms that support spatial navigation: the impact of spatial scale , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[15]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Scale and Multiple Psychologies of Space , 1993, COSIT.

[16]  Xiaoqian J Chai,et al.  Sex differences in directional cue use in a virtual landscape. , 2009, Behavioral neuroscience.

[17]  R. Skelton,et al.  Simple gaze analysis and special design of a virtual Morris water maze provides a new method for differentiating egocentric and allocentric navigational strategy choice , 2011, Behavioural Brain Research.

[18]  C. Vorhees,et al.  Morris water maze: procedures for assessing spatial and related forms of learning and memory , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[19]  P. Dudchenko The hippocampus as a cognitive map , 2010 .

[20]  A. Santos,et al.  Summary of Travel Trends: 2009 National Household Travel Survey , 2011 .

[21]  Isabelle Ecuyer-Dab,et al.  Spatial ability and home-range size: examining the relationship in Western men and women (Homo sapiens). , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[22]  Gilbert S. Omenn,et al.  Males and Females , 1973 .

[23]  Xiaoqian J. Chai,et al.  Effects of cue types on sex differences in human spatial memory , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[24]  E. Tolman Cognitive maps in rats and men. , 1948, Psychological review.

[25]  Lace M. K. Padilla,et al.  Sex Differences in Mobility and Spatial Cognition , 2016, Human nature.

[26]  R. D'Hooge,et al.  Applications of the Morris water maze in the study of learning and memory , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[27]  S. Gaulin,et al.  Why Go There? Evolution of Mobility and Spatial Cognition in Women and Men , 2016, Human nature.

[28]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Children's Use of Landmarks: Implications for Modularity Theory , 2002, Psychological science.

[29]  Nora S Newcombe,et al.  Why size counts: children's spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures. , 2008, Developmental science.