Global network analysis of phenotypic effects: Protein networks and toxicity modulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Using genome-wide information to understand holistically how cells function is a major challenge of the postgenomic era. Recent efforts to understand molecular pathway operation from a global perspective have lacked experimental data on phenotypic context, so insights concerning biologically relevant network characteristics of key genes or proteins have remained largely speculative. Here, we present a global network investigation of the genotype/phenotype data set we developed for the recovery of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae from exposure to DNA-damaging agents, enabling explicit study of how protein–protein interaction network characteristics may be associated with phenotypic functional effects. We show that toxicity-modulating proteins have similar topological properties as essential proteins, suggesting that cells initiate highly coordinated responses to damage similar to those needed for vital cellular functions. We also identify toxicologically important protein complexes, pathways, and modules. These results have potential implications for understanding toxicity-modulating processes relevant to a number of human diseases, including cancer and aging.

[1]  Walter L. Smith Probability and Statistics , 1959, Nature.

[2]  M. Degroot,et al.  Probability and Statistics , 2021, Examining an Operational Approach to Teaching Probability.

[3]  W. Yamamoto,et al.  AY's Neuroanatomy of C. elegans for Computation , 1992 .

[4]  P. Legrain,et al.  Toward a functional analysis of the yeast genome through exhaustive two-hybrid screens , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[5]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[6]  L. Samson,et al.  Global response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to an alkylating agent. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  James R. Knight,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.

[8]  D. Lauffenburger Cell signaling pathways as control modules: complexity for simplicity? , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  M. Vidal,et al.  Protein interaction mapping in C. elegans using proteins involved in vulval development. , 2000, Science.

[10]  R. Albert,et al.  The large-scale organization of metabolic networks , 2000, Nature.

[11]  George M. Church,et al.  Regulatory Networks Revealed by Transcriptional Profiling of Damaged Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cells: Rpn4 Links Base Excision Repair with Proteasomes , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[12]  M. Saraste,et al.  FEBS Lett , 2000 .

[13]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[14]  D. Fell,et al.  The small world inside large metabolic networks , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  J. Wojcik,et al.  The protein–protein interaction map of Helicobacter pylori , 2001, Nature.

[16]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants , 2001, Science.

[17]  R. Ozawa,et al.  A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Sergei Maslov,et al.  Protein interaction networks beyond artifacts , 2002, FEBS letters.

[19]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2002, Science.

[20]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry , 2002, Nature.

[21]  P. Bourgine,et al.  Topological and causal structure of the yeast transcriptional regulatory network , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[22]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Transcriptional Regulatory Networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Science.

[23]  Ioannis Xenarios,et al.  DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  P. Bork,et al.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes , 2002, Nature.

[25]  C. Deane,et al.  Protein Interactions , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[26]  Trey Ideker,et al.  Damage recovery pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed by genomic phenotyping and interactome mapping. , 2002, Molecular cancer research : MCR.

[27]  P. Shannon,et al.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. , 2003, Genome research.

[28]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Bioinformatics analysis of experimentally determined protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2003, Genome research.

[29]  James R. Knight,et al.  A Protein Interaction Map of Drosophila melanogaster , 2003, Science.

[30]  L. Mirny,et al.  Protein complexes and functional modules in molecular networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  B. Palsson,et al.  Genome-scale reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. , 2003, Genome research.

[32]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Global Mapping of the Yeast Genetic Interaction Network , 2004, Science.

[33]  S. L. Wong,et al.  A Map of the Interactome Network of the Metazoan C. elegans , 2004, Science.

[34]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[35]  Lan V. Zhang,et al.  Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein–protein interaction network , 2004, Nature.

[36]  Trey Ideker,et al.  Hot spots for modulating toxicity identified by genomic phenotyping and localization mapping. , 2004, Molecular cell.