Revising for Meaning: Effects of Knowledge and Strategy.

Two experiments examined developmental and individual differences in students' revising for meaning. In Experiment 1, the authors investigated effects of knowledge of topic and knowledge of error location on revising done by middle school and college students. Knowledge of topic helped with meaning-level revising but did not seem necessary when surface-level editing was the goal. More interesting, knowledge of error location helped college students with both editing and revising but focused middle school students on editing at the expense of revising. In Experiment 2, the authors used a dyad-discussion design to investigate further differences in reading strategies during revising. The authors listened as pairs of 7th-grade students of different writing abilities (high, middle, and low) collaboratively revised. The results of Experiment 2 were consistent with the outcomes in Experiment 1, that is, knowing error location may focus less sophisticated writers too narrowly and thereby impede meaning-based revision.

[1]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[2]  N. Sommers.  Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers. , 1980 .

[3]  Hayes.  identifying the organization of wi iiing processes , 1980 .

[4]  David Bartholomae,et al.  The Study of Error. , 1980 .

[5]  Lillian S. Bridwell,et al.  Revising Strategies in Twelfth Grade Students Transactional Writing , 1980 .

[6]  Joseph M. Williams.  The Phenomenology of Error. , 1981 .

[7]  Lucy Calkins,et al.  Lessons from a child : on the teaching and learning of writing , 1983 .

[8]  Donald H. Graves.  Writing Teachers and Children At Work , 1983 .

[9]  Judith A. Langer.  The Effects of Available Information on Responses to School Writing Tasks. , 1984 .

[10]  L. Flower.  Detection, Diagnosis, and the Strategies of Revision , 1986, College Composition & Communication.

[11]  D. McCutchen.  Domain knowledge and linguistic knowledge in the development of writing ability , 1986 .

[12]  P. Ornstein,et al.  Children's Generation and Communication of Mnemonic Organizational Strategies. , 1986 .

[13]  Judith A. Langer.  Reading, Writing, and Understanding , 1986 .

[14]  Linda DeGroff.  The Influence of Prior Knowledge on Writing, Conferencing, and Revising , 1987, The Elementary School Journal.

[15]  Jill Fitzgerald,et al.  Research on Revision in Writing , 1987 .

[16]  Deborah McCutchen,et al.  Editing Strategies and Error Correction in Basic Writing , 1987 .

[17]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The psychology of written composition , 1987 .

[18]  Sheldon Rosenberg.  Reading, writing, and language learning , 1987 .

[19]  D. McCutchen,et al.  “Functional Automaticity” in Children's Writing , 1988 .

[20]  C. Beal,et al.  The development of text evaluation and revision skills. , 1990, Child development.

[21]  David L. Wallace,et al.  Redefining Revision for Freshmen , 1991, Reading Empirical Research Studies: The Rhetoric of Research.

[22]  Earl C. Butterfield,et al.  Children's writing : toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing , 1994 .

[23]  Douglas J. Hacker,et al.  Environmental, cognitive, and metacognitive influences on text revision: Assessing the evidence , 1996 .

[24]  Carole R. Beal,et al.  The role of comprehension monitoring in Children's revision , 1996 .

[25]  C. Cameron,et al.  Written expression as recontextualization: Children write in social time , 1996 .

[26]  David L. Wallace,et al.  Better revision in eight minutes? Prompting first-year college writers to revise globally. , 1996 .

[27]  J. Hayes.  A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. , 1996 .