Optimal Equilibria of the Best Shot Game

We consider any network environment in which the “best shot game” is played. This is the case where the possible actions are only two for every node (0 and 1), and the best response for a node is 1 if and only if all her neighbors play 0. A natural application of the model is one in which the action 1 is the purchase of a good, which is locally a public good, in the sense that it will be available also to neighbors. This game will typically exhibit a great multiplicity of equilibria. Imagine a social planner whose scope is to find an optimal equilibrium, i.e. one in which the number of nodes playing 1 is minimal. To find such an equilibrium is a very hard task for any non-trivial network architecture. We propose an implementable mechanism that, in the limit of infinite time, reaches an optimal equilibrium, even if this equilibrium and even the network structure is unknown to the social planner.

[1]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[2]  Yves Crama,et al.  Simulated annealing for complex portfolio selection problems , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Yann Bramoullé,et al.  Public goods in networks , 2007, J. Econ. Theory.

[4]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[5]  Dunia Lopez Pintado,et al.  The Spread of Free-Riding Behavior in a Social Network , 2007 .

[6]  O. Catoni Simulated annealing algorithms and Markov chains with rare transitions , 1999 .

[7]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[8]  Roger Lagunoff,et al.  Social Norms, Local Interaction, and Neighborhood Planning , 2000 .

[9]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Learning by Doing and Learning from Others: Human Capital and Technical Change in Agriculture , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  Eswar S. Prasad,et al.  Forthcoming in the American Economic Review , 2006 .

[11]  J. Hirshleifer From weakest-link to best-shot: The voluntary provision of public goods , 1983 .

[12]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[13]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Network games , 2004, STOC '04.

[14]  R. Kranton,et al.  Strategic Interaction and Networks , 2010 .

[15]  Antoni Calvó-Armengol,et al.  Centre De Referència En Economia Analítica Barcelona Economics Working Paper Series Working Paper Nº 178 Who's Who in Networks. Wanted: the Key Player Who's Who in Networks. Wanted: the Key Player Barcelona Economics Wp Nº 178 , 2022 .

[16]  Brian W. Rogers,et al.  Meeting Strangers and Friends of Friends: How Random are Social Networks? , 2007 .

[17]  A. Galeotti,et al.  The Law of the Few , 2010 .

[18]  P. Pin,et al.  Statistical mechanics of maximal independent sets. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.