High intrinsic rate of DNA loss in Drosophila

PSEUDOGENES are common in mammals but virtually absent in Drosophila1. All putative Drosophila pseudogenes show patterns of molecular evolution that are inconsistent with the lack of functional constraints2–5. The absence of bona fide pseudogenes is not only puzzling, it also hampers attempts to estimate rates and patterns of neutral DNA change. The estimation problem is especially acute in the case of deletions and insertions, which are likely to have large effects when they occur in functional genes and are therefore subject to strong purifying selection. We propose a solution to this problem by taking advantage of the propensity of retrotransposable elements without long terminal repeats (non-LTR) to create non-functional, 'dead-on-arrival' copies of themselves as a common by-product of their transpositional cycle6–8. Phylogenetic analysis of a non-LTR element, Helena, demonstrates that copies lose DNA at an unusually high rate, suggesting that lack of pseudogenes in Drosophila is the product of rampant deletion of DNA in unconstrained regions. This finding has important implications for the study of genome evolution in general and the 'C-value paradox'9 in particular.

[1]  A. Weiner,et al.  Nonviral retroposons: genes, pseudogenes, and transposable elements generated by the reverse flow of genetic information. , 1986, Annual review of biochemistry.

[2]  G. Gutman,et al.  Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[3]  G. L. Miklos,et al.  The Eukaryote Genome in Development and Evolution , 1987, Springer Netherlands.

[4]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Processed pseudogenes in Drosophila , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  M. Palazzolo,et al.  Transposon-facilitated DNA sequencing. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  M. Long,et al.  Natural selection and the origin of jingwei, a chimeric processed functional gene in Drosophila. , 1993, Science.

[7]  T. Eickbush,et al.  Reverse transcription of R2Bm RNA is primed by a nick at the chromosomal target site: A mechanism for non-LTR retrotransposition , 1993, Cell.

[8]  D. T. Sullivan,et al.  Unusual molecular evolution of an Adh pseudogene in Drosophila. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.

[9]  P. Currie,et al.  Structure, expression and duplication of genes which encode phosphoglyceromutase of Drosophila melanogaster. , 1994, Genetics.

[10]  D. Petrov,et al.  Diverse transposable elements are mobilized in hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila virilis. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  W. Lathe,et al.  R1 and R2 retrotransposable elements of Drosophila evolve at rates similar to those of nuclear genes. , 1995, Genetics.

[12]  R. Britten,et al.  Phylogeny, rates of evolution, and patterns of codon usage among sea urchin retroviral-like elements, with implications for the recognition of horizontal transfer. , 1995, Molecular biology and evolution.

[13]  A. Hughes,et al.  Small genomes for better flyers , 1995, Nature.

[14]  W. Gilbert,et al.  Introns and gene evolution , 1996, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.