Understanding and affecting student reasoning about sound waves

Student learning of sound waves can be helped through the creation of group-learning classroom materials whose development and design rely on explicit investigations into student understanding. We describe reasoning in terms of sets of resources, i.e. grouped building blocks of thinking that are commonly used in many different settings. Students in our university physics classes often used sets of resources that were different from the ones we wish them to use. By designing curriculum materials that ask students to think about the physics from a different view, we bring about improvement in student understanding of sound waves. Our curriculum modifications are specific to our own classes, but our description of student learning is more generally useful for teachers. We describe how students can use multiple sets of resources in their thinking, and raise questions that should be considered by both instructors and researchers.

[1]  Jeffery M. Saul,et al.  On the effectiveness of active-engagement microcomputer-based laboratories , 1997 .

[2]  L. McDermott,et al.  Investigation of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension , 1980 .

[3]  Peter S. Shaffer,et al.  Development and assessment of a research-based tutorial on light and shadow , 1998 .

[4]  Arnold B. Arons,et al.  A Guide to Introductory Physics Teaching , 1990 .

[5]  Cedric Linder,et al.  University physics students’ conceptualizations of factors affecting the speed of sound propagation , 1993 .

[6]  Cedric Linder,et al.  Understanding sound: so what is the problem? , 1992 .

[7]  A. diSessa,et al.  What changes in conceptual change , 1998 .

[8]  M. Chi,et al.  Naive Physics Reasoning: A Commitment to Substance-Based Conceptions , 2000 .

[9]  A. diSessa.  Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[10]  Peter S. Shaffer,et al.  Tutorials in Introductory Physics , 1998 .

[11]  Andrew Elby.  Helping physics students learn how to learn , 2001 .

[12]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs , 1994 .

[13]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Millikan Lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned—Closing the gap , 1991 .

[14]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  MATHEMATICAL TUTORIALS IN INTRODUCTORY PHYSICS , 1997 .

[15]  L. McDermott,et al.  Resource Letter: PER-1: Physics Education Research , 1999 .

[16]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  Making Sense of How Students Make Sense of Mechanical Waves , 1999, physics/0207092.

[17]  Model Analysis: Assessing the dynamics of student learning , 2002, physics/0207069.

[18]  Peter S. Shaffer,et al.  An investigation of student understanding of single-slit diffraction and double-slit interference , 1999 .

[19]  David Hammer,et al.  Student resources for learning introductory physics , 2000 .

[20]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Development of a computer‐based tutorial on the photoelectric effect , 1996 .

[21]  Cedric Linder,et al.  A study of tertiary physics students’ conceptualizations of sound , 1989 .

[22]  D. Tirosh,et al.  Cognitive Conflict and Intuitive Rules. , 1998 .

[23]  Michael Wittman.  Making sense of how students come to an understanding of physics: An example from mechanical waves , 1998 .

[24]  Michael C. Wittmann.  The object coordination class applied to wave pulses: Analysing student reasoning in wave physics , 2002, physics/0207042.

[25]  L. McDermott,et al.  Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension , 1981 .

[26]  Peter S. Shaffer,et al.  Research as a guide for teaching introductory mechanics: An illustration in the context of the Atwood’s machine , 1994 .