The effect of model order selection in group PICA

Independent component analysis (ICA) of functional MRI data is sensitive to model order selection. There is a lack of knowledge about the effect of increasing model order on independent components' (ICs) characteristics of resting state networks (RSNs). Probabilistic group ICA (group PICA) of 55 healthy control subjects resting state data was repeated 100 times using ICASSO repeatability software and after clustering of components, centrotype components were used for further analysis. Visual signal sources (VSS), default mode network (DMN), primary somatosensory (S1), secondary somatosensory (S2), primary motor cortex (M1), striatum, and precuneus (preC) components were chosen as components of interest to be evaluated by varying group probabilistic independent component analysis (PICA) model order between 10 and 200. At model order 10, DMN and VSS components fuse several functionally separate sources that at higher model orders branch into multiple components. Both volume and mean z‐score of components of interest showed significant (P < 0.05) changes as a function of model order. In conclusion, model order has a significant effect on ICs characteristics. Our findings suggest that using model orders ≤20 provides a general picture of large scale brain networks. However, detection of some components (i.e., S1, S2, and striatum) requires higher model order estimation. Model orders 30–40 showed spatial overlapping of some IC sources. Model orders 70 ± 10 offer a more detailed evaluation of RSNs in a group PICA setting. Model orders > 100 showed a decrease in ICA repeatability, but added no significance to either volume or mean z‐score results. Hum Brain Mapp, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution , 1995, Neural Computation.

[2]  S Makeig,et al.  Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[3]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[4]  B. Biswal,et al.  Blind source separation of multiple signal sources of fMRI data sets using independent component analysis. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications , 2000, Neural Networks.

[6]  Bharat Biswal,et al.  Slow vasomotor fluctuation in fMRI of anesthetized child brain , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  V D Calhoun,et al.  Spatial and temporal independent component analysis of functional MRI data containing a pair of task‐related waveforms , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[8]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[9]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[10]  John G. Neuhoff,et al.  Spatiotemporal Pattern of Neural Processing in the Human Auditory Cortex , 2002, Science.

[11]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[12]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Real-time independent component analysis of fMRI time-series , 2003, NeuroImage.

[13]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  Independent component analysis of functional MRI: what is signal and what is noise? , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[14]  Ricardo Vigário,et al.  Overlearning in Marginal Distribution-Based ICA: Analysis and Solutions , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[15]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Independent component analysis of nondeterministic fMRI signal sources , 2003, NeuroImage.

[16]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  ICA of functional MRI data: an overview. , 2003 .

[17]  Jia-Hong Gao,et al.  Comparison of TCA and ICA techniques in fMRI data processing , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Validating the independent components of neuroimaging time series via clustering and visualization , 2004, NeuroImage.

[19]  E. Formisano,et al.  Functional connectivity as revealed by spatial independent component analysis of fMRI measurements during rest , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[20]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  M. Greicius,et al.  Default-mode network activity distinguishes Alzheimer's disease from healthy aging: Evidence from functional MRI , 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[22]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  John D. Carew,et al.  Independent component analysis applied to self-paced functional MR imaging paradigms , 2005, NeuroImage.

[24]  Andreas Bartels,et al.  Brain dynamics during natural viewing conditions—A new guide for mapping connectivity in vivo , 2005, NeuroImage.

[25]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Independent component analysis of fMRI group studies by self-organizing clustering , 2005, NeuroImage.

[26]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  E. Bullmore,et al.  A Resilient, Low-Frequency, Small-World Human Brain Functional Network with Highly Connected Association Cortical Hubs , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  fMRI resting state networks define distinct modes of long-distance interactions in the human brain , 2006, NeuroImage.

[29]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Assignment of functional activations to probabilistic cytoarchitectonic areas revisited , 2007, NeuroImage.

[30]  Tülay Adali,et al.  Estimating the number of independent components for functional magnetic resonance imaging data , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[31]  J. Xiong,et al.  Detecting functional connectivity in the resting brain: a comparison between ICA and CCA. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[32]  Cornelis J. Stam,et al.  Small-world and scale-free organization of voxel-based resting-state functional connectivity in the human brain , 2008, NeuroImage.

[33]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Modulation of temporally coherent brain networks estimated using ICA at rest and during cognitive tasks , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[34]  Keith A. Johnson,et al.  Cortical Hubs Revealed by Intrinsic Functional Connectivity: Mapping, Assessment of Stability, and Relation to Alzheimer's Disease , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Greg G. Brown,et al.  Dysregulation of working memory and default‐mode networks in schizophrenia using independent component analysis, an fBIRN and MCIC study , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[36]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Xiangyu Long,et al.  Functional segmentation of the brain cortex using high model order group PICA , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[38]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity of default mode network components: Correlation, anticorrelation, and causality , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[39]  A Aragri,et al.  Does the default-mode functional connectivity of the brain correlate with working-memory performances? , 2009, Archives italiennes de biologie.

[40]  Jutta S. Mayer,et al.  Specialization in the default mode: Task‐induced brain deactivations dissociate between visual working memory and attention , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[41]  Seungjin Choi,et al.  Independent Component Analysis , 2009, Handbook of Natural Computing.