Perspectives for the production of bioethanol from wood and straw in Austria: technical, economic, and ecological aspects

Bioethanol produced from lignocellulosic resources is a promising candidate for the replacement of fossil fuels. In this study, we aim to determine the perspectives to produce lignocellulosic ethanol in Austria. Technical, environmental and economic aspects are being considered. Thirteen biotechnological production concepts using the raw materials straw and softwood were established and simulated with the steady state flowsheeting software IPSEpro. Bioethanol production cost and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for each system were calculated based on mass and energy balances obtained from process simulation. The emission of GHGs along the entire bioethanol process chain (“from well to wheel”) are compared to two reference systems producing the same amounts of by-products. In all concepts, process heat and considerable amounts of the by-products electricity, heat, pellets, C5 molasses, or biomethane could be obtained from residual biomass. Compared to a reference system driven by fossil energy, GHG emissions can be reduced by up to 76%. The production cost of ethanol was found to between 0.66 € and 0.94 € per liter of gasoline equivalent. The type and amount of by-product influence technical, economic, and environmental performance significantly. Converting all straw and softwood available in Austria to ethanol would result in an annual production of 340 kt.

[1]  A. Aden,et al.  Process Design Report for Stover Feedstock: Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover , 2002 .

[2]  M. Curran,et al.  A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective , 2007 .

[3]  J. Y. Zhu,et al.  Woody biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production: Technology and energy consumption evaluation. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[4]  Walter Steiner,et al.  Production of Trichoderma cellulase in laboratory and pilot scale , 1991 .

[5]  M. Galbe,et al.  Recirculation of process water in the production of ethanol from softwood , 1997 .

[6]  Anton Friedl,et al.  Modeling and simulation of coupled ethanol and biogas production , 2010 .

[7]  M. Galbe,et al.  Techno‐Economic Evaluation of Producing Ethanol from Softwood: Comparison of SSF and SHF and Identification of Bottlenecks , 2008, Biotechnology progress.

[8]  Havva Balat,et al.  Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel , 2009 .

[9]  G. Zacchi,et al.  Techno-economic evaluation of stillage treatment with anaerobic digestion in a softwood-to-ethanol process , 2010, Biotechnology for biofuels.

[10]  M. Galbe,et al.  Energy considerations for a SSF-based softwood ethanol plant. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[11]  N. Shah,et al.  The greenhouse gas emissions performance of cellulosic ethanol supply chains in Europe , 2009, Biotechnology for biofuels.

[12]  K. Varmuza,et al.  Prediction of heating values of biomass fuel from elemental composition , 2005 .

[13]  A. Friedl,et al.  Evaluation of Ethanol from Lignocellulosic Biomass – Process Scenarios for Austria , 2010 .

[14]  B. Hahn-Hägerdal,et al.  Towards industrial pentose-fermenting yeast strains , 2007, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[15]  Kelly N. Ibsen,et al.  Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover , 2002 .

[16]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Good or bad bioethanol from a greenhouse gas perspective – What determines this? , 2009 .

[17]  I. S. Pretorius,et al.  Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology , 2002, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[18]  T. Chakrabarti,et al.  Commercializing lignocellulosic bioethanol: technology bottlenecks and possible remedies , 2010 .

[19]  A. Friedl,et al.  Prozesssimulation der Produktion von Ethanol und Methan aus lignocellulosehaltigen Rohstoffen , 2011 .

[20]  M. Galbe,et al.  Techno-Economic Evaluation of Bioethanol Production from Three Different Lignocellulosic Materials , 2008 .

[21]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[22]  A. Friedl,et al.  Process Simulation of Ethanol from Straw – Validation of Scenarios for Austria , 2011 .

[23]  Mats Galbe,et al.  The influence of solid/liquid separation techniques on the sugar yield in two-step dilute acid hydrolysis of softwood followed by enzymatic hydrolysis , 2009, Biotechnology for biofuels.

[24]  A. Friedl,et al.  Ethanol from Lignocellulosic Biomass – Evaluation of Process Scenarios for Austria , 2010 .

[25]  Anselm Eisentraut,et al.  Sustainable Production of Second-Generation Biofuels: Potential and Perspectives in Major Economies and Developing Countries , 2010 .

[26]  Jan Larsen,et al.  The IBUS Process – Lignocellulosic Bioethanol Close to a Commercial Reality , 2008 .

[27]  G. Zacchi,et al.  Integration options for high energy efficiency and improved economics in a wood-to-ethanol process , 2008, Biotechnology for biofuels.