Evolution of Individual Group Size Preference Can Increase Group-Level Selection and Cooperation

The question of how cooperative groups can evolve and be maintained is fundamental to understanding the evolution of social behaviour in general, and the major transitions in particular. Here, we show how selection on an individual trait for group size preference can increase variance in fitness at the group-level, thereby leading to an increase in cooperation through stronger group selection. We are thus able to show conditions under which a population can evolve from an initial state with low cooperation and only weak group selection, to one where group selection is a highly effective force.

[1]  A. Griffin,et al.  Evolutionary Explanations for Cooperation , 2007, Current Biology.

[2]  Richard A. Watson,et al.  Individual Selection for Cooperative Group Formation , 2007, ECAL.

[3]  M. Bedau.  Artificial life: organization, adaptation and complexity from the bottom up , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  Wolfgang Banzhaf,et al.  Advances in Artificial Life , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[5]  David Sloan Wilson,et al.  ALTRUISM IN MENDELIAN POPULATIONS DERIVED FROM SIBLING GROUPS: THE HAYSTACK MODEL REVISITED , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  David Sloan Wilson,et al.  (1994) Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences. BBS 17: 585-654 , 1996 .

[7]  Hans-Curt Flemming,et al.  The EPS Matrix: The “House of Biofilm Cells” , 2007, Journal of bacteriology.

[8]  George Williams.  Group Selection , 1971 .

[9]  Richard A. Watson,et al.  The Efficacy of Group Selection is Increased by Coexistence Dynamics within Groups , 2008, ALIFE.

[10]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  EVOLUTION OF SEX RATIO IN STRUCTURED DEMES , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  John Stewart,et al.  Evolutionary Transitions and Artificial Life , 1997, Artificial Life.

[12]  A. van Oudenaarden,et al.  Snowdrift game dynamics and facultative cheating in yeast , 2009, Nature.

[13]  C. Hauert,et al.  Models of cooperation based on the Prisoner's Dilemma and the Snowdrift game , 2005 .

[14]  Leticia Avilés,et al.  Cooperation and non-linear dynamics: An ecological perspective on the evolution of sociality , 1999 .

[15]  R. Michod.  Darwinian Dynamics: Evolutionary Transitions in Fitness and Individuality , 1999 .

[16]  J. M. Smith.  Group Selection and Kin Selection , 1964, Nature.

[17]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[18]  J. M. Smith,et al.  Group Selection , 1976, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[19]  E. Sober,et al.  Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences , 1994 .

[20]  Geoff S. Nitschke,et al.  Emergence of Cooperation: State of the Art , 2005, Artificial Life.

[21]  Robert M. May,et al.  Group selection , 1975, Nature.

[22]  Robert Boyd,et al.  Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation , 2003 .