The relationship between the Evaluation Tool of Children's Handwriting and teachers' perceptions of handwriting legibility.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the Evaluation Tool of Children's Handwriting (ETCH) and teachers perception of handwriting legibility METHODS The ETCH was administered to 45 first-grade students with illegible handwriting as reported by their teachers. The teachers completed a teachers questionnaire at the same time to indicate the children's level of handwriting difficulties both in general and in specific tasks that resemble the test tasks of the ETCH. RESULTS There was no significant relationship between the ETCH scores and the teacher questionnaire scores in either general legibility or task-specific legibility. CONCLUSION The ecological validity of the ETCH, in reference to the teachers' perception of handwriting legibility, was not established. Further changes for scoring criteria may be warranted before the ETCH can be used with confidence that the scores obtained are meaningfully related to actual performance in the classroom as determined by teachers.

[1]  Dennis Briggs,et al.  A Study of the Influence of Handwriting upon Grades Using Examination Scripts , 1980 .

[2]  S. Cermak,et al.  Fine motor activities in elementary school: preliminary findings and provisional implications for children with fine motor problems. , 1992, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[3]  Dennis Briggs,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF HANDWRITING ON ASSESSMENT , 1970 .

[4]  R A Keith,et al.  CONCEPTUAL BASIS OF OUTCOME MEASURES , 1995, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[5]  Joanne Phelps,et al.  The Children's Handwriting Evaluation Scale for Manuscript Writing. , 1988 .

[6]  L. R. Markham,et al.  Influences of Handwriting Quality on Teacher Evaluation of Written Work1 , 1976 .

[7]  Stephen Graham,et al.  A review of handwriting scales and factors that contribute to variability in handwriting scores , 1986 .

[8]  John O. Cooper,et al.  Cursive Handwriting: Measurement of Function Rather Than Topography , 1991 .

[9]  Alan E. Kazdin,et al.  Assessing the Clinical or Applied Importance of Behavior Change through Social Validation , 1977 .

[10]  J. Ziviani,et al.  An Evaluation of Handwriting Performance , 1984 .

[11]  C. I. Chase ESSAY TEST SCORING: INTERACTION OF RELEVANT VARIABLES , 1986 .

[12]  S M Diekema,et al.  Test-retest reliability of the evaluation tool of children's handwriting-manuscript. , 1998, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[13]  Jean Alston,et al.  A Legibility Index: can handwriting be measured? , 1983 .

[14]  Steve Graham,et al.  HANDWRITING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE: A UNIFIED APPROACH , 1980 .

[15]  J. Reisman Development and Reliability of the Research Version of the Minnesota Handwriting Test , 1993 .