Environmental conditions have been shown to impact several economically important traits in beef cattle. In this study, genetic x nutritional environment interaction has been evaluated in a composite beef cattle breed (50% Red Angus, 25% Charolais, 25% Tarentaise). Four nutritional environments (MARG-RES, MARG-CTRL, ADEQ-RES and ADEQ-CTRL) were created based on 2 levels of winter supplement provided to dams grazing winter range during gestation (MARG and ADEQ) and 2 levels of input to offspring during post-weaning development (RES and CTRL). Genetic parameters of average daily gain during the 140-d post wean trial (ADG), yearling weight (YW), and ultrasound measurement of fat depth over the rib (FAT) and intramuscular fat (IMF) of 3,020 individuals in the four environments were estimated. The heritabilities estimated using a single trait mixed linear model were: ADG: 0.21, 0.23, 0.19 and 0.21; YW: 0.27, 0.33, 0.20 and 0.26; FAT: 0.30, 0.29, 0.29, 0.55; IMF: 0.45, 0.51, 0.33, 0.53 for MARG-RES, MARG-CTRL and ADEQ-RES and ADEQ-CTRL respectively. To evaluate the extent of genotype x environment interaction reaction norms was implemented. The correlations between the intercept and the slope were -0.19, -0.34, 0.98, and 0.05 for ADG, YW, FAT and IMF respectively. High correlations between intercept and slope indicate that animals with high genetic merit respond better to improvement of the environment. Low correlations between intercept and slope could potentially mean re-ranking of animals. The heritabilities were higher in high feed inputs during post weaning period (ADEQ-MARG, ADEQ-CTRL) for ADG, YW and FAT. Furthermore, the reaction norm model results showed that genotype by environment interaction had a higher effect on traits with a lower heritability.
[1]
R. Funston,et al.
TRIENNIAL REPRODUCTION SYMPOSIUM: Beef heifer development and lifetime productivity in rangeland-based production systems.
,
2016,
Journal of animal science.
[2]
V. Ducrocq,et al.
Modelling and estimation of genotype by environment interactions for production traits in French dairy cattle
,
2012,
Genetics Selection Evolution.
[3]
L. G. Albuquerque,et al.
Effects of sex and age on genotype x environment interaction for beef cattle body weight studied using reaction norm models.
,
2011,
Journal of animal science.
[4]
F. Cardoso,et al.
Hierarchical Bayesian models for genotype × environment estimates in post-weaning gain of Hereford bovine via reaction norms
,
2011
.
[5]
R. Veerkamp,et al.
Optimization of dairy cattle breeding programs for different environments with genotype by environment interaction.
,
2006,
Journal of dairy science.
[6]
G. Jong,et al.
Selection and phenotypic plasticity in evolutionary biology and animal breeding
,
2002
.
[7]
M. Calus,et al.
Genotype x environment interaction for protein yield in Dutch dairy cattle as quantified by different models.
,
2002,
Journal of dairy science.
[8]
J. Jensen,et al.
Genotype by Environment Interaction in Nordic Dairy Cattle Studied Using Reaction Norms
,
2002
.
[9]
F. Cardoso,et al.
Genotype by environment interaction characterization and model comparison for post weaning gain adjustment of Devon cattle via reaction norms
,
2009
.