Spatial resolution and sensitivity in photoacoustic tomography taking noise into account: from point-like detectors to large integrating detectors

As for any other imaging technique spatial resolution and sensitivity are important features for a photoacoustic imaging device. It is already well known that spatial resolution depends on the size and the bandwidth of the detectors. Therefore for photoacoustic image reconstruction usually small point-like and broadband detectors are assumed, which measure the pressure as a function of time on a detection surface around the sample. But in reality point-like detectors are not ideal at all: because of the small detector volume the thermodynamic fluctuations (= noise) get high and the signal amplitude is low, which results in a bad signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). For a bigger detector volume the fluctuations are less and the signal amplitude is better, which gives a better SNR. But on the other hand the photoacoustic pressure signal is averaged over the whole detector volume, which results in blurring and a reduced spatial resolution if reconstruction algorithms for point-like detectors are used. To characterize this trade-off between spatial resolution and sensitivity for a varying detector volume in a quantitative way the pressure is described by a random variable having the measured pressure as a mean value and noise as random fluctuations around that mean value ("stochastic process"). For a PVDF detector the optimum for the detector size is given.

[1]  L. Trefethen Spectral Methods in MATLAB , 2000 .

[2]  G. M.,et al.  Partial Differential Equations I , 2023, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[3]  M. Haltmeier,et al.  Exact and approximative imaging methods for photoacoustic tomography using an arbitrary detection surface. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  Hao F. Zhang Functional Photoacoustic Microscopy , 2009 .

[5]  K. P. Köstli,et al.  Two-dimensional photoacoustic imaging by use of Fourier-transform image reconstruction and a detector with an anisotropic response. , 2003, Applied optics.

[6]  Markus Haltmeier,et al.  Spatial resolution in photoacoustic tomography: effects of detector size and detector bandwidth , 2010 .

[7]  H. Weber,et al.  Optoacoustic imaging using a three-dimensional reconstruction algorithm , 2001 .

[8]  Xinmai Yang,et al.  Ring-based ultrasonic virtual point detector with applications to photoacoustic tomography , 2007 .

[9]  B T Cox,et al.  k-Wave: MATLAB toolbox for the simulation and reconstruction of photoacoustic wave fields. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[10]  Thomas Berer,et al.  Compensation of Ultrasound Attenuation in Photoacoustic Imaging , 2011 .

[11]  Markus Haltmeier,et al.  Inversion of Spherical Means and the Wave Equation in Even Dimensions , 2007, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[12]  Xu Xiao Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine , 2008 .

[13]  Gaik Ambartsoumian,et al.  Thermoacoustic tomography - implementation of exact backprojection formulas , 2005 .

[14]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Universal back-projection algorithm for photoacoustic computed tomography. , 2005 .

[15]  A. R. Mitchell,et al.  The Finite Difference Method in Partial Differential Equations , 1980 .