Solving the stereo correspondence problem with false matches

The stereo correspondence problem exists because false matches between the images from multiple sensors camouflage the true (veridical) matches. True matches are correspondences between image points that have the same generative source; false matches are correspondences between similar image points that have different sources. This problem of selecting true matches among false ones must be overcome by both biological and artificial stereo systems in order for them to be useful depth sensors. The proposed re-examination of this fundamental issue shows that false matches form a symmetrical pattern in the array of all possible matches, with true matches forming the axis of symmetry. The patterning of false matches can therefore be used to locate true matches and derive the depth profile of the surface that gave rise to them. This reverses the traditional strategy, which treats false matches as noise. The new approach is particularly well-suited to extract the 3-D locations and shapes of camouflaged surfaces and to work in scenes characterized by high degrees of clutter. We demonstrate that the symmetry of false-match signals can be exploited to identify surfaces in random-dot stereograms. This strategy permits novel depth computations for target detection, localization, and identification by machine-vision systems, accounts for physiological and psychophysical findings that are otherwise puzzling and makes possible new ways for combining stereo and motion signals.

[1]  Bart Farell,et al.  A neural model for the integration of stereopsis and motion parallax in structure from motion , 2008, Neurocomputing.

[2]  Tyler Cw Stereomovement from interocular delay in dynamic visual noise: a random spatial disparity hypothesis. , 1977 .

[3]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. , 1990, Science.

[4]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Geometry of binocular vision and a model for stereopsis , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[5]  Ning Qian,et al.  Physiological computation of binocular disparity , 1997, Vision Research.

[6]  Olaf Blanke,et al.  Vestibular-Somatosensory Interactions: Effects of Passive Whole-Body Rotation on Somatosensory Detection , 2014, PloS one.

[7]  Bart Farell,et al.  A new theory of structure-from-motion perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[8]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  A Taxonomy and Evaluation of Dense Two-Frame Stereo Correspondence Algorithms , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[9]  Bart Farell,et al.  Solving The Binocular Correspondence Problem With Ghost Matches. , 2013 .

[10]  G C DeAngelis,et al.  The physiology of stereopsis. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  B. G. Cumming,et al.  Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception , 1997, Nature.

[12]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Affine structure from motion. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[13]  Paul B. Hibbard,et al.  Depth Perception Not Found in Human Observers for Static or Dynamic Anti-Correlated Random Dot Stereograms , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  B. Julesz Binocular depth perception of computer-generated patterns , 1960 .

[15]  A. Mizuno,et al.  A change of the leading player in flow Visualization technique , 2006, J. Vis..

[16]  B. Julesz Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[17]  Brendon O. Watson,et al.  Computing relief structure from motion with a distributed velocity and disparity representation , 2002, Vision Research.

[18]  H. Smallman,et al.  Size-disparity correlation in stereopsis at contrast threshold. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[19]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Binocular Vision and Stereopsis , 1996 .

[20]  G. Orban,et al.  At Least at the Level of Inferior Temporal Cortex, the Stereo Correspondence Problem Is Solved , 2003, Neuron.

[21]  B G Cumming,et al.  Disparity Detection in Anticorrelated Stereograms , 1998, Perception.

[22]  Zhaoqi Wang,et al.  3D entity-based stereo matching with ground control points and joint second-order smoothness prior , 2014, The Visual Computer.

[23]  Alexander I. Cogan,et al.  Depth in anticorrelated stereograms: Effects of spatial density and interocular delay , 1993, Vision Research.

[24]  Zhuowen Tu,et al.  Robust Point Matching via Vector Field Consensus , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[25]  T. Poggio,et al.  A computational theory of human stereo vision , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[26]  Ernst Mach,et al.  The Analysis of Sensations. , 1916 .

[27]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  A Cooperative Algorithm for Stereo Matching and Occlusion Detection , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[28]  D. Gabor,et al.  Theory of communication. Part 1: The analysis of information , 1946 .

[29]  R. A. Smith,et al.  Disparity processing of spatial frequencies in man , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  D Marr,et al.  Cooperative computation of stereo disparity. , 1976, Science.

[31]  A. Parker,et al.  Range and mechanism of encoding of horizontal disparity in macaque V1. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Zhongjie Zhu,et al.  Hybrid scheme for accurate stereo matching , 2017, Neurocomputing.

[33]  Bela Julesz,et al.  Global Stereopsis: Cooperative Phenomena in Stereoscopic Depth Perception , 1978 .