Predicting extinction risks under climate change: coupling stochastic population models with dynamic bioclimatic habitat models

Species responses to climate change may be influenced by changes in available habitat, as well as population processes, species interactions and interactions between demographic and landscape dynamics. Current methods for assessing these responses fail to provide an integrated view of these influences because they deal with habitat change or population dynamics, but rarely both. In this study, we linked a time series of habitat suitability models with spatially explicit stochastic population models to explore factors that influence the viability of plant species populations under stable and changing climate scenarios in South African fynbos, a global biodiversity hot spot. Results indicate that complex interactions between life history, disturbance regime and distribution pattern mediate species extinction risks under climate change. Our novel mechanistic approach allows more complete and direct appraisal of future biotic responses than do static bioclimatic habitat modelling approaches, and will ultimately support development of more effective conservation strategies to mitigate biodiversity losses due to climate change.

[1]  A. Hampe Bioclimate envelope models: what they detect and what they hide , 2004 .

[2]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Use and misuse of the IUCN Red List Criteria in projecting climate change impacts on biodiversity , 2006 .

[3]  Tony Rebelo,et al.  Sasol proteas: A field guide to the proteas of southern Africa , 1995 .

[4]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Biodiversity conservation: Uncertainty in predictions of extinction risk , 2004, Nature.

[5]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  Biodiversity conservation: Effects of changes in climate and land use , 2004, Nature.

[6]  Hong S. He,et al.  Integrating Landscape and Metapopulation Modeling Approaches: Viability of the Sharp‐Tailed Grouse in a Dynamic Landscape , 2004 .

[7]  M. Araújo,et al.  The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change , 2007 .

[8]  W. Thuiller BIOMOD – optimizing predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change , 2003 .

[9]  S. Williams,et al.  Potential decoupling of trends in distribution area and population size of species with climate change , 2005 .

[10]  Tim N. Palmer,et al.  Ensemble forecasting , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[11]  Mark New,et al.  Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  T. Dawson,et al.  Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? , 2003 .

[13]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. , 1996 .

[14]  D. Rubenstein,et al.  The Impact of Increased Environmental Stochasticity Due to Climate Change on the Dynamics of Asiatic Wild Ass , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[15]  Colin J. Thompson,et al.  Expected minimum population size as a measure of threat , 2001 .

[16]  M. Sykes,et al.  Predicting global change impacts on plant species' distributions: Future challenges , 2008 .

[17]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  Utility of Dynamic‐Landscape Metapopulation Models for Sustainable Forest Management , 2005 .

[18]  G. F. Midgleya,et al.  Developing regional and species-level assessments of climate change impacts on biodiversity in the Cape Floristic Region , 2003 .

[19]  E. Menges,et al.  Using Population Viability Analysis to Predict the Effects of Climate Change on the Extinction Risk of an Endangered Limestone Endemic Shrub, Arizona Cliffrose , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.