The effect of land cover type and structure on evapotranspiration from agricultural and wetland sites in the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta, California

Abstract Water is a limited and valuable resource in California. A large proportion of the fresh water for southern California is supplied by the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers. With recent efforts to restore large areas of land in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta region from farmland to managed wetlands, it is important to investigate the effect of wetland restoration on the local water cycle. We measured evapotranspiration using the eddy covariance method over six different sites in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta from 2013 to 2016. The three restored wetlands sites differed in time since restoration and wetland structure, i.e. the area of open water compared to closed vegetation. The three agricultural sites were a flooded rice field, an alfalfa field, and a grazed cattle pasture. In most years, annual evapotranspiration was significantly lower at the drained agricultural sites, with 652 ± 131 mm (2 year average ± standard deviation, SD) for the pasture and 901 ± 24 mm (3 year average ± SD) for the alfalfa field, compared to the two open water wetlands, with 1091 ± 144 mm (4 year average ± SD) for the Mayberry wetland and 1140 ± 67 mm (3 year average ± SD) at the East End wetland. Annual evapotranspiration at the flooded rice site (975 ± 50 mm, 4 year average ± SD) or the closed vegetation wetland (West Pond wetland, 996 ± 63 mm, 4 year average ± SD) was not significantly different from the drained alfalfa site across individual years. Our analysis showed that the structural difference between the wetlands, specifically the fraction of open water compared to closed vegetation, has a large impact on evapotranspiration dynamics. Through analysis of normalized equilibrium evaporation and nighttime evapotranspiration measurements we deduced that evapotranspiration at the wetland with a low fraction of open water surfaces was almost entirely dominated by plant transpiration with very little contribution from evaporation, despite the fact that the site was flooded and water was readily available. Both evaporation and transpiration contributed substantially to evapotranspiration at the two wetlands with larger fraction of open water surfaces. At the closed canopy site evaporation from subcanopy water seemed to be inhibited through two mechanisms: first, the closed canopy prevented heating of the water column and led to significantly cooler water temperatures, which reduced surface vapor pressure. Second, the closed canopy decoupled the water surface from the atmosphere and inhibited turbulent transport of water vapor away from the water surface. Our results provide valuable insights into the water use in California wetlands and can inform decisions on how to maximize water conservation during wetland restoration.

[1]  Sari Palmroth,et al.  Leaf stomatal responses to vapour pressure deficit under current and CO(2)-enriched atmosphere explained by the economics of gas exchange. , 2008, Plant, cell & environment.

[2]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Scaling Properties of Biologically Active Scalar Concentration Fluctuations in the Atmospheric Surface Layer over a Managed Peatland , 2010 .

[3]  Hans Peter Schmid,et al.  Increase in forest water-use efficiency as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise , 2013, Nature.

[4]  T. Meyers,et al.  Measuring Biosphere‐Atmosphere Exchanges of Biologically Related Gases with Micrometeorological Methods , 1988 .

[5]  R. L. Miller.  Carbon Gas Fluxes in Re-Established Wetlands on Organic Soils Differ Relative to Plant Community and Hydrology , 2011, Wetlands.

[6]  G. Katul,et al.  An approximate analytical model for footprint estimation of scalar fluxes in thermally stratified atmospheric flows , 2000 .

[7]  E. Variano,et al.  Gas exchange in wetlands with emergent vegetation: The effects of wind and thermal convection at the air‐water interface , 2013 .

[8]  C. Priestley,et al.  On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters , 1972 .

[9]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  Identifying scale‐emergent, nonlinear, asynchronous processes of wetland methane exchange , 2016 .

[10]  K. McNaughton,et al.  A mixed-layer model for regional evaporation , 1986 .

[11]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Tracking the structural and functional development of a perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium L.) infestation using a multi-year archive of webcam imagery and eddy covariance measurements , 2011 .

[12]  G. Katul,et al.  Soil moisture and vegetation controls on evapotranspiration in a heterogeneous Mediterranean ecosystem on Sardinia, Italy , 2006 .

[13]  Iryna Dronova,et al.  The impact of expanding flooded land area on the annual evaporation of rice , 2016 .

[14]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  How will land use affect air temperature in the surface boundary layer? Lessons learned from a comparative study on the energy balance of an oak savanna and annual grassland in California, USA , 2013 .

[15]  I. Overeem,et al.  Sinking deltas due to human activities , 2009 .

[16]  Frans T. M. Nieuwstadt,et al.  Temperature measurement with a sonic anemometer and its application to heat and moisture fluxes , 1983 .

[17]  J. B. Ruhl,et al.  Committing to ecological restoration , 2015, Science.

[18]  Carbon dioxide exchange of a pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium L.) infestation: How do flowering and mowing affect canopy photosynthesis and autotrophic respiration? , 2011 .

[19]  E. K. Webb,et al.  Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer , 1980 .

[20]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Measuring fluxes of trace gases and energy between ecosystems and the atmosphere – the state and future of the eddy covariance method , 2014, Global change biology.

[21]  W. Oechel,et al.  The uncertain climate footprint of wetlands under human pressure , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  G. J. Collatz,et al.  Comparison of Radiative and Physiological Effects of Doubled Atmospheric CO2 on Climate , 1996, Science.

[23]  G. Bohrer,et al.  Environmental drivers of methane fluxes from an urban temperate wetland park , 2014 .

[24]  T. A. Black,et al.  Observed increase in local cooling effect of deforestation at higher latitudes , 2011, Nature.

[25]  G. Bonan.  Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests , 2008, Science.

[26]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Evaluation of a hierarchy of models reveals importance of substrate limitation for predicting carbon dioxide and methane exchange in restored wetlands , 2017 .

[27]  W. James Shuttleworth,et al.  Has the Priestley-Taylor Equation Any Relevance to Forest Evaporation? , 1979 .

[28]  G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 , 2008 .

[29]  Andres Schmidt,et al.  Empirical assessment of uncertainties of meteorological parameters and turbulent fluxes in the AmeriFlux network , 2012 .

[30]  T. Vesala,et al.  On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: review and improved algorithm , 2005 .

[31]  Steven J. Deverel,et al.  Present-day oxidative subsidence of organic soils and mitigation in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, USA , 2016, Hydrogeology Journal.

[32]  Richard L. Snyder,et al.  Evapotranspiration rates and crop coefficients for a restored marsh in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, California, USA , 2008 .

[33]  J. Kaimal,et al.  Another look at sonic thermometry , 1991 .

[34]  W. Oechel,et al.  Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites , 2002 .

[35]  Jehn-Yih Juang,et al.  Separating the effects of albedo from eco‐physiological changes on surface temperature along a successional chronosequence in the southeastern United States , 2007 .

[36]  G. Daily,et al.  Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  W. Silver,et al.  Large Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Temperate Peatland Pasture , 2011, Ecosystems.

[38]  Andrew E. Suyker,et al.  Land management and land-cover change have impacts of similar magnitude on surface temperature , 2014 .

[39]  W. Silver,et al.  Effects of seasonality, transport pathway, and spatial structure on greenhouse gas fluxes in a restored wetland , 2017, Global change biology.

[40]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Parsing the variability in CH4 flux at a spatially heterogeneous wetland: Integrating multiple eddy covariance towers with high‐resolution flux footprint analysis , 2014 .

[41]  R. Snyder,et al.  A micrometeorological investigation of a restored California wetland ecosystem , 2003 .

[42]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.

[43]  J. Norman,et al.  Evaluation of soil and vegetation heat flux predictions using a simple two-source model with radiometric temperatures for partial canopy cover , 1999 .

[44]  D. Baldocchi.  Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: past, present and future , 2003 .

[45]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Agricultural peatland restoration: effects of land‐use change on greenhouse gas (CO2 and CH4) fluxes in the Sacramento‐San Joaquin Delta , 2015, Global change biology.

[46]  William J. Sacks,et al.  Effects of global irrigation on the near-surface climate , 2009 .

[47]  T. A. Black,et al.  Predicting the onset of net carbon uptake by deciduous forests with soil temperature and climate data: a synthesis of FLUXNET data , 2005, International journal of biometeorology.

[48]  Oliver Sonnentag,et al.  Greenhouse gas (CO2, CH4, H2O) fluxes from drained and flooded agricultural peatlands in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta , 2012 .

[49]  Richard L. Snyder,et al.  A review of models and micrometeorological methods used to estimate wetland evapotranspiration , 2004 .

[50]  F. E. Anderson,et al.  Comparing laser-based open- and closed-path gas analyzers to measure methane fluxes using the eddy covariance method , 2011 .

[51]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Biophysical controls on interannual variability in ecosystem‐scale CO2 and CH4 exchange in a California rice paddy , 2016 .

[52]  T. A. Black,et al.  Energy balance closure at the BERMS flux towers in relation to the water balance of the White Gull Creek watershed 1999–2009 , 2012 .

[53]  T. Foken,et al.  Tools for quality assessment of surface-based flux measurements , 1996 .

[54]  M. Litvak,et al.  Factors that control Typha marsh evapotranspiration , 2007 .

[55]  J. Drexler,et al.  The legacy of wetland drainage on the remaining peat in the Sacramento — San Joaquin Delta, California, USA , 2009, Wetlands.

[56]  M. Heimann,et al.  Comprehensive comparison of gap-filling techniques for eddy covariance net carbon fluxes , 2007 .

[57]  Jordan G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2 , 2005 .

[58]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Revisiting the partitioning of net ecosystem exchange of CO2 into photosynthesis and respiration with simultaneous flux measurements of 13CO2 and CO2, soil respiration and a biophysical model, CANVEG , 2017 .

[59]  W. Silver,et al.  The challenges of measuring methane fluxes and concentrations over a peatland pasture , 2012 .

[60]  Michael B. McElroy,et al.  A 3‐D model analysis of the slowdown and interannual variability in the methane growth rate from 1988 to 1997 , 2004 .

[61]  Stuart Rojstaczer,et al.  Subsidence of agricultural lands in the Sacramento‐San Joaquin Delta, California: Role of aqueous and gaseous carbon fluxes , 1996 .

[62]  William J. Massman,et al.  Reflections on the surface energy imbalance problem , 2012 .

[63]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Does day and night sampling reduce spurious correlation between canopy photosynthesis and ecosystem respiration , 2015 .

[64]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  A Hybrid Model for Mapping Relative Differences in Belowground Biomass and Root: Shoot Ratios Using Spectral Reflectance, Foliar N and Plant Biophysical Data within Coastal Marsh , 2015, Remote. Sens..