Bureaucratic Benefit-Cost Analysis and Policy Controversy

Critiques of benefit-cost analysis (BCA) are usually made on theoretical or methodological grounds; however, understanding how BCA is actually used in decision-making processes is critical if BCA is to inform policy-making. Our paper examines how the implementation of BCA within policy decision-making processes can serve to increase, rather than alleviate, controversy. This runs contrary to the standard assumption that BCA improves decision-making by providing objective data that serves as a basis for policy consensus. To frame this issue, we engage the literature on the role of science in policy decisions and the role of bureaucrats in understanding and implementing policy research. We introduce the concept of “Bureaucratic BCA” as a framework for the practical application of BCA; Bureaucratic BCA does not refer to BCA specifically conducted by bureaucrats or a lesser, technically inferior version of BCA, but rather acknowledges that BCA plays an interactive role within bureaucratic decision-making processes rather than simply serving as a sterilized information input. We show how the dynamics of BCA within the policy process can make BCA a source of controversy and waste rather than an aid to policy efficiency. In light of the Bureaucratic BCA framework, we provide recommendations as to how BCA can be implemented more productively.

[1]  Adam Wierman,et al.  Thinking fast and slow: Optimization decomposition across timescales , 2017, 2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[2]  A. Keeler.  A Modest Proposal for the Extension of Nonmarket Valuation Methods , 2016 .

[3]  Peter C. Wiley,et al.  The Evolution of Non-Market Valuation of U.S. Coastal and Marine Resources , 2015 .

[4]  Richard O. Zerbe,et al.  Principles and Standards for Benefit-Cost Analysis , 2013 .

[5]  Scott Farrow,et al.  Towards Principles and Standards for the Benefit-Cost Analysis of Safety , 2011 .

[6]  A. Vining,et al.  An Assessment of Important Issues Concerning the Application of Benefit-Cost Analysis to Social Policy , 2010, Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis.

[7]  Jason Seawright,et al.  Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research , 2008 .

[8]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Some Pitfalls of an Overemphasis on Science in Environmental Risk Management Decisions , 2006 .

[9]  B. Masters.  Principles of Water Resources: History, Development, Management and Policy , 2005 .

[10]  D. Sarewitz.  How science makes environmental controversies worse , 2004 .

[11]  B. Jones.  Bounded Rationality and Political Science: Lessons from Public Administration and Public Policy , 2003 .

[12]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[13]  J. Caulkins.  Using Models that Incorporate Uncertainty. , 2002 .

[14]  R. Hahn,et al.  A New Executive Order for Improving Federal Regulation? Deeper and Wider Cost-Benefit Analysis , 2002 .

[15]  R. Nickerson.  Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .

[16]  John Merrifield,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Benefit-Cost Analysis: A key to increased use and acceptance , 1997 .

[17]  E. Tufte.  Visual explanations: images and quantities, evidence and narrative , 1997 .

[18]  Philip Mirowski,et al.  Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life , 1996 .

[19]  A. Boardman,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice , 1996 .

[20]  A. Lafond,et al.  Trust in Numbers , 1995 .

[21]  A. Vining,et al.  Policy analysis : concepts and practice , 1989 .

[22]  Hank C. Jenkins-Smith,et al.  Professional roles for policy analysts: A critical assessment , 1982 .

[23]  Tyler A. Scott,et al.  Benefit-Cost Analysis and Integrated Data Systems , 2015 .

[24]  John W. Fantuzzo,et al.  Actionable Intelligence: Using Integrated Data Systems to Achieve a More Effective, Efficient, and Ethical Government , 2015 .

[25]  J. Loomis.  Economic Valuation: Concepts and Empirical Methods , 2014 .

[26]  Joseph Cook.  “Principles and Standards for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Public Health Preparedness and Pandemic Mitigation Programs” , 2010 .

[27]  Christine Chambers Goodman.  The Color of Our Character: Confronting the Racial Character of Rule 404(b) Evidence , 2007 .

[28]  Louis E. Wolcher.  Senseless Kindness: The Politics of Cost-Benefit Analysis , 2006 .

[29]  Bryan D. Jones,et al.  Punctuated Equilibrium Theory: Explaining Stability and Change in Public Policymaking , 2006 .

[30]  D. Stone.  Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making , 1997 .

[31]  J. Barry.  Rising Tide: The Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 and How It Changed America , 1997 .

[32]  D. Ellis.  Visual explanations: Images and quantities , 1997 .

[33]  A. Boardman,et al.  Costs and benefits through bureaucratic lenses: Example of a highway project , 1993 .

[34]  M. G. Morgan,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[35]  I. E. Anderson.  Floods of the Puyallup and Chehalis River Basins, Washington , 1948 .

[36]  Encroachments.  Letter from the secretary of war , 1918 .