The effects of sensory impairments on product experience and personal well-being

To determine the roles that the sensory modalities play in user – product interactions, one modality was blocked during the execution of eight simple tasks. Participants reported how they experienced the products and how they felt during the experiment. Blocking vision resulted in the largest loss of functional information, increased task difficulty and task duration, and fostered dependency. On the other hand, the other senses were used more and product experiences increased in perceived intenseness. When touch was blocked, the perceived loss of information was smaller and participants reported that familiar products felt less like their own. Blocking audition resulted in communication problems and a feeling of being cut off. Blocking olfaction mainly decreased the intenseness of the experience. These outcomes suggest that vision mainly plays a functional role in everyday user – product interactions, whereas the main role for olfaction lies in the affective domain. Sensory impairments change the way people experience products. Blocking a single modality during everyday tasks gives insight into the impact of impairments. These insights can be used to develop products for multiple user groups (inclusive design) or products used under extreme environmental conditions.

[1]  R. Melzack Pain and the neuromatrix in the brain. , 2001, Journal of dental education.

[2]  T. Hasbroucq,et al.  A comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[3]  K. Anstey,et al.  Two-Year Decline in Vision but Not Hearing Is Associated with Memory Decline in Very Old Adults in a Population-Based Sample , 2001, Gerontology.

[4]  D. Bavelier,et al.  Cross-modal plasticity: where and how? , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  J. Schooler,et al.  A naturalistic study of autobiographical memories evoked by olfactory and visual cues: testing the Proustian hypothesis. , 2002, The American journal of psychology.

[6]  E. Zrenner Will Retinal Implants Restore Vision ? , 2002 .

[7]  S. Smith,et al.  Perceptual isolation using a silent room. , 1959, Lancet.

[8]  Shekhar Saxena,et al.  Multiple-informant ranking of the disabling effects of different health conditions in 14 countries , 1999, The Lancet.

[9]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Sending Sound to the Brain , 2002, Science.

[10]  M. Posner,et al.  Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance. , 1976, Psychological review.

[11]  R. Doty,et al.  Smell and taste function in the visually impaired , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Ann Marie Fiore,et al.  Understanding Aesthetics for the Merchandising and Design Professional , 1996 .

[13]  Ross A. McFarland,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF SENSORY FUNCTIONS IN RELATION TO AGE , 1962 .

[14]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Haptic exploration in the presence of vision. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  A. Hough Pride and a Daily Marathon , 1992 .

[16]  P. Walter Retinal Implants , 2006 .

[17]  A. Marcel,et al.  Structured Perceptual Input Imposes an Egocentric Frame of Reference—Pointing, Imagery, and Spatial Self-Consciousness , 2005, Perception.

[18]  L. Burns,et al.  Sensory Interaction and Descriptions of Fabric Hand , 1995, Perceptual and motor skills.

[19]  H. Schifferstein,et al.  THE TACTUAL EXPERIENCE OF OBJECTS , 2008 .

[20]  H. Schifferstein The perceived importance of sensory modalities in product usage: a study of self-reports. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[21]  M. Heller Visual and tactual texture perception: Intersensory cooperation , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  R. Welch Perceptual Modification: Adapting to Altered Sensory Environments , 1978 .

[23]  Gouke J. Bonsel,et al.  Disability Weights for Diseases: A Modified Protocol and Results for a Western European Region , 2000 .

[24]  Philip Kotler,et al.  Brand Sense: Build Powerful Brands through Touch, Taste, Smell, Sight, and Sound , 2005 .

[25]  Tracy B. Henley,et al.  Cognitive and affective components of stimuli presented in three modes , 1993 .

[26]  Ruth Mugge,et al.  PRODUCT ATTACHMENT: DESIGN STRATEGIES TO STIMULATE THE EMOTIONAL BONDING TO PRODUCTS , 2008 .

[27]  K. Anstey,et al.  Demographic, health, cognitive, and sensory variables as predictors of mortality in very old adults. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[28]  Beth T. Stalvey,et al.  Timed Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Tasks: Relationship to Visual Function in Older Adults , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[29]  F. Colavita,et al.  A further investigation of visual dominance , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  P. Bach-y-Rita Tactile Sensory Substitution Studies , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[31]  P. Stjärne,et al.  Consequences of olfactory loss and adopted coping strategies. , 2004, Rhinology.

[32]  J. Peck,et al.  It Just Feels Good: Customers’ Affective Response to Touch and Its Influence on Persuasion: , 2006 .

[33]  A. Enander,et al.  Performance and sensory aspects of work in cold environments: a review. , 1984, Ergonomics.

[34]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Identifying objects by touch: An “expert system” , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  B. Rovner,et al.  Depression and Disability Associated with Impaired Vision: The MoVIES Project , 1998, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[36]  L Gardner,et al.  An appraisal of a selection of products currently available to older consumers. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[37]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases injuries and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. , 1996 .

[38]  E. Hirschman,et al.  The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun , 1982 .

[39]  I M Ventry,et al.  Hearing impairment and social isolation in the elderly. , 1982, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[40]  Rachel S. Herz,et al.  An Examination of Objective and Subjective Measures of Experience Associated to Odors, Music, and Paintings , 1998 .

[41]  A. J. Healey,et al.  Ride Quality Ratings as a Function of Sensory Input , 1979 .

[42]  K. Yaffe,et al.  Vision Impairment and Combined Vision and Hearing Impairment Predict Cognitive and Functional Decline in Older Women , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[43]  R. Heslin,et al.  Hands touching hands: affective and evaluative effects of an interpersonal touch. , 1976, Sociometry.

[44]  B. Jones,et al.  Combining vision and touch in texture perception , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  D. Dubois Categories as Acts of Meaning: The Case of Categories in Olfaction and Audition , 1999 .

[46]  C. Victor,et al.  Hearing difficulty and its psychological implications for the elderly. , 1984, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[47]  C. Owsley,et al.  Vision-specific health-related quality of life: Content areas for nursing home residents , 2002, Quality of Life Research.

[48]  M. Lindstrom Brand Sense: How to Build Powerful Brands Through Touch, Taste, Smell, Sight and Sound , 2006 .

[49]  Thomas Stephan,et al.  Eye closure in darkness animates sensory systems , 2003, NeuroImage.

[50]  C. Krumhansl Music: A Link Between Cognition and Emotion , 2002 .

[51]  R. Gonzalez Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 2003 .

[52]  N. Rogers,et al.  Ergonomic data of elderly people and their application in rehabilitation design. , 1996, Disability and rehabilitation.

[53]  Klaus R. Scherer,et al.  Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms , 2003, Speech Commun..

[54]  Peter B. L. Meijer,et al.  An experimental system for auditory image representations , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[55]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  The metamodal organization of the brain. , 2001, Progress in brain research.

[56]  E. Reiter,et al.  Impact of olfactory impairment on quality of life and disability. , 2001, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[57]  H. Schifferstein,et al.  Capturing product experiences: a split-modality approach. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[58]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.