Rumors, Fake News and Social Bots in Conflicts and Emergencies: Towards a Model for Believability in Social Media

The use of social media is gaining more and more in importance in ordinary life but also in conflicts and emergencies. The social big data, generated by users, is partially also used as a source for situation assessment, e.g. to receive pictures or to assess the general mood. However, the information's believability is hard to control and can deceive. Rumors, fake news and social bots are phenomenons that challenge the easy consumption of social media. To address this, our paper explores the believability of content in social media. Based on foundations of information quality we conducted a literature study to derive a three-level model for assessing believability. It summarizes existing assessment approaches, assessment criteria and related measures. On this basis, we describe several steps towards the development of an assessment approach that works across different types of social media.

[1]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  The rise of social bots , 2014, Commun. ACM.

[2]  Roger Blake,et al.  From Content to Context , 2017, ACM J. Data Inf. Qual..

[3]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Challenges and Recommendations of Literature Search in Information Systems Research , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  College Students' Credibility Judgments in the Information-Seeking Process , 2008 .

[5]  K. Saikaew,et al.  Features for Measuring Credibility on Facebook Information , 2015 .

[6]  Barbara Poblete,et al.  Predicting information credibility in time-sensitive social media , 2013, Internet Res..

[7]  Eric Brill,et al.  An Overview of Empirical Natural Language Processing , 1997, AI Mag..

[8]  Navneet Kaur,et al.  Opinion mining and sentiment analysis , 2016, 2016 3rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom).

[9]  Felix Naumann,et al.  Assessment Methods for Information Quality Criteria , 2000, IQ.

[10]  Yimin Chen,et al.  Misleading Online Content: Recognizing Clickbait as "False News" , 2015, WMDD@ICMI.

[11]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Supporting “Everyday Analysts” in Safety- and Time-Critical Situations , 2011, Inf. Soc..

[12]  Kyounghee Hazel Kwon,et al.  An Exploration of Social Media in Extreme Events: Rumor Theory and Twitter during the Haiti Earthquake 2010 , 2010, ICIS.

[13]  Christian Reuter,et al.  The aggregation of information qualities in collaborative software , 2013 .

[14]  Leysia Palen,et al.  (How) will the revolution be retweeted?: information diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian uprising , 2012, CSCW.

[15]  Jacquelyn A. Burkell,et al.  Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  Thomas Ludwig,et al.  XHELP: Design of a Cross-Platform Social-Media Application to Support Volunteer Moderators in Disasters , 2015, CHI.

[17]  Hector Garcia-Molina,et al.  The Eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in P2P networks , 2003, WWW '03.

[18]  N. Eberhardt Conducting Research Literature Reviews From The Internet To Paper , 2016 .

[19]  Thomas Ludwig,et al.  Social Haystack , 2015, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[20]  Thomas Ludwig,et al.  Social-QAS: Tailorable Quality Assessment Service for Social Media Content , 2015, IS-EUD.

[21]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  Community Intelligence and Social Media Services: A Rumor Theoretic Analysis of Tweets During Social Crises , 2013, MIS Q..

[22]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Natural-Language Processing , 1982, Artificial Intelligence.

[23]  Claire Cardie,et al.  OpinionFinder: A System for Subjectivity Analysis , 2005, HLT.

[24]  Barbara Poblete,et al.  Information credibility on twitter , 2011, WWW.

[25]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Trial by fire: The deployment of trusted digital volunteers in the 2011 shadow lake fire , 2012, ISCRAM.

[26]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Ponnurangam Kumaraguru,et al.  TweetCred: Real-Time Credibility Assessment of Content on Twitter , 2014, SocInfo.

[28]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Introduction: Social media and collaborative systems for crisis management , 2011, TCHI.

[29]  Stephan Prödel,et al.  Analysis of information quality criteria in a crisis situation as a characteristic of complex situations , 2010, ICIQ.

[30]  Amanda Lee Hughes,et al.  Collective Intelligence in Disaster: Examination of the Phenomenon in the Aftermath of the 2007 Virginia Tech Shooting , 2008 .

[31]  Anupam Joshi,et al.  Faking Sandy: characterizing and identifying fake images on Twitter during Hurricane Sandy , 2013, WWW.

[32]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[33]  B. Morton Fake news. , 2018, Marine pollution bulletin.

[34]  Gernot Gräfe,et al.  Bedeutung der Informationsqualität bei Kaufentscheidungen im Internet , 2011 .

[35]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Quality information and knowledge , 1998 .

[36]  Barbara Poblete,et al.  Twitter under crisis: can we trust what we RT? , 2010, SOMA '10.