Adding stress biomarkers to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin for rapid non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction rule-out protocols

Abstract Aims This study tested the hypothesis that combining stress-induced biomarkers (copeptin or glucose) with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) increases diagnostic accuracy for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in patients presenting to the emergency department. Methods and results The ability to rule-out NSTEMI for combinations of baseline hs-cTnT or hs-cTnI with copeptin or glucose was compared with the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) hs-cTnT/I-only rule-out algorithms in two independent (one Norwegian and one international multicentre) diagnostic studies. Among 959 patients (median age 64 years, 60.5% male) with suspected NSTEMI in the Norwegian cohort, 13% had NSTEMI. Adding copeptin or glucose to hs-cTnT/I as a continuous variable did not improve discrimination as quantified by the area under the curve {e.g. hs-cTnT/copeptin 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89–0.93] vs. hs-cTnT alone 0.91 (95% CI 0.89–0.93); hs-cTnI/copeptin 0.85 (95% CI 0.82–0.87) vs. hs-cTnI alone 0.93 (95% CI 0.91–0.95)}, nor did adding copeptin <9 mmol/L or glucose <5.6 mmol/L increase the sensitivity of the rule-out provided by hs-cTnT <5 ng/L or hs-cTnI <4 ng/L in patients presenting more than 3 h after chest pain onset (target population in the ESC-0 h-algorithm). The combination decreased rule-out efficacy significantly (both P < 0.01). These findings were confirmed among 1272 patients (median age 62 years, 69.3% male) with suspected NSTEMI in the international validation cohort, of which 20.7% had NSTEMI. A trend towards increased sensitivity for the hs-cTnT/I/copeptin combinations (97–100% vs. 91–97% for the ESC-0 h-rule-out cut-offs) was observed in the Norwegian cohort. Conclusion Adding copeptin or glucose to hs-cTnT/I did not increase diagnostic performance when compared with current ESC guideline hs-cTnT/I-only 0 h-algorithms.

[1]  Ò. Miró,et al.  Cardiovascular Biomarkers in the Early Discrimination of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction. , 2021, JAMA cardiology.

[2]  S. Blankenberg,et al.  Critical appraisal of the 2020 ESC guideline recommendations on diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome , 2021, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[3]  H. Bundgaard,et al.  Temporal Release of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T and I and Copeptin After Brief Induced Coronary Artery Balloon Occlusion in Humans. , 2020, Circulation.

[4]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. , 2020, European heart journal.

[5]  Ò. Miró,et al.  Early Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction With Point-of-Care High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I. , 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  S. Satar,et al.  Does stress hyperglycemia affect mortality? Acute myocardial infarction – case control study , 2019, Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases.

[7]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Copeptin to rule out myocardial infarction in Blacks versus Caucasians , 2019, European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care.

[8]  R. Bingisser,et al.  Outcome of Applying the ESC 0/1-hour Algorithm in Patients With Suspected Myocardial Infarction. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  P. Collinson,et al.  Aiming toWards Evidence baSed inTerpretation of Cardiac biOmarkers in patients pResenting with chest pain-the WESTCOR study: study design , 2019, Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ.

[10]  A. von Eckardstein,et al.  Comparison of fourteen rule-out strategies for acute myocardial infarction. , 2019, International journal of cardiology.

[11]  R. Body,et al.  Combined testing of copeptin and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T at presentation in comparison to other algorithms for rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction. , 2019, International journal of cardiology.

[12]  Jostein Dale,et al.  Description of chest pain patients in a Norwegian emergency department , 2019, Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ.

[13]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). , 2018, Circulation.

[14]  Kristian Thygesen,et al.  Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  S. Hadjadj,et al.  Plasma copeptin, kidney disease, and risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in two cohorts of type 2 diabetes , 2018, Cardiovascular Diabetology.

[16]  Ò. Miró,et al.  Prospective Validation of the 0/1-h Algorithm for Early Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  Ò. Miró,et al.  Direct Comparison of 4 Very Early Rule-Out Strategies for Acute Myocardial Infarction Using High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I , 2017, Circulation.

[18]  P. Collinson,et al.  How Well Do Laboratories Adhere to Recommended Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Myocardial Infarction: The CARdiac MArker Guidelines Uptake in Europe Study (CARMAGUE). , 2016, Clinical chemistry.

[19]  A. Lassen,et al.  Diagnostic packages can be assigned accurately in emergency departments. A multi-centre cohort study. , 2016, Danish medical journal.

[20]  A. Schoenenberger,et al.  Incremental value of copeptin in suspected acute myocardial infarction very early after symptom onset , 2016, European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care.

[21]  S. Fichtlscherer,et al.  Analyzing the Release of Copeptin from the Heart in Acute Myocardial Infarction Using a Transcoronary Gradient Model , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[22]  P. Collinson,et al.  High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I at presentation in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a cohort study , 2015, The Lancet.

[23]  C. Vilaplana,et al.  Use of copeptin and high-sensitive cardiac troponin T for diagnosis and prognosis in patients with diabetes mellitus and suspected acute myocardial infarction. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[24]  J. Greenslade,et al.  Combining presentation high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I and glucose measurements to rule-out an acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting to emergency department with chest pain. , 2015, Clinical biochemistry.

[25]  M. Sebbane,et al.  A systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis to determine the incremental value of copeptin for rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction. , 2014, The American journal of cardiology.

[26]  S. Blankenberg,et al.  Early discharge using single cardiac troponin and copeptin testing in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS): a randomized, controlled clinical process study , 2014, European heart journal.

[27]  P. Collinson,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of combined cardiac troponin and copeptin assessment for early rule-out of myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2014, European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care.

[28]  A. Kosinski A weighted generalized score statistic for comparison of predictive values of diagnostic tests , 2013, Statistics in medicine.

[29]  R. Niska,et al.  National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2007 emergency department summary. , 2010, National health statistics reports.

[30]  N. Morgenthaler,et al.  Copeptin: a biomarker of cardiovascular and renal function. , 2010, Congestive heart failure.

[31]  Tobias Reichlin,et al.  Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with sensitive cardiac troponin assays. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[33]  A. Anand,et al.  High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin on Presentation to Rule Out Myocardial Infarction A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial , 2021 .

[34]  S. Mehta,et al.  Rule-In and Rule-Out of Myocardial Infarction Using Cardiac Troponin and Glycemic Biomarkers in Patients with Symptoms Suggestive of Acute Coronary Syndrome. , 2017, Clinical chemistry.

[35]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  [2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)]. , 2016, Giornale italiano di cardiologia.

[36]  J. Alpert,et al.  The third universal definition of myocardial infarction , 2013 .

[37]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. , 2012, Circulation.

[38]  Michael Marber,et al.  Sensitive troponin I assay in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction , 2010 .