After ANT:an illustrative discussion of the implications for qualitative accounting case research

The main aim of this article is to shed some light on the way in which actor network theory (ANT) might contribute to case research in accounting. The paper will seek to explain some of the theoretical suppositions which are commonly associated with ANT and which have so far made little impact on the accounting literature. At the same time the accounting literature has shown a particular reluctance to engage with the central concept of ANT which Lee and Hassard characterise as the desire to bring together the "human and non-human, social and technical factors in the same analytical view". The article also features a discussion of a research project which used an approach giving emphasis to both humans and objects in order to understand how ``facts'' have come to be settled as they are. In taking such views into the research it is hoped to provide insight into both the detail of accounting as it is practised within organisations and the manner in which human actors and objects of technology may combine to constitute networks within organisations.

[1]  B. Latour.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[2]  A. Lowe.  The Role of Accounting in the Processes of Health Reform: Providing a 'Black Box' in the Costing of Blood Products , 1997 .

[3]  S. Woolgar,et al.  The Manufacture of Knowledge: an Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science , 1982 .

[4]  A. Hopwood,et al.  On trying to study accounting in the contexts in which it operates , 1983 .

[5]  K. J. Euske,et al.  RATIONAL, RATIONALIZING, AND REIFYING USES OF ACCOUNTING DATA IN ORGANIZATIONS. , 1987 .

[6]  Peter Miller,et al.  Accounting and the construction of the governable person , 1987 .

[7]  Jan Mouritsen,et al.  Managerial Technology and Netted Networks. `Competitiveness' in Action: The Work of Translating Performance in a High-Tech Firm , 1999 .

[8]  B. Latour.  The pasteurization of France , 1988 .

[9]  Shahid Ansari,et al.  Symbolism, Collectivism and Rationality in Organisational Control , 1991 .

[10]  B. Latour.  Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 1999 .

[11]  R. Boland,et al.  Accounting in organizations: A union of natural and rational perspectives , 1983 .

[12]  A. Hopwood,et al.  The archeology of accounting systems , 1987 .

[13]  S. Lawrence,et al.  The Great Experiment: Financial Management Reform in the NZ Health Sector , 1994 .

[14]  K. Robson.  Governing Science and economic growth at a distance: accounting representation and the management of research and development , 1993 .

[15]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  What Is a Case?: Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry , 1992 .

[16]  Thomas Ahrens,et al.  Accounting and Organizations: Realizing the Richness of Field Research , 1998 .

[17]  Sue Llewellyn,et al.  Working in hermeneutic circles in management accounting research: some implications and applications , 1993 .

[18]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  Management Consultants: Systems Development, Power and the Translation of Problems , 1992 .

[19]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[20]  M. Mulkay,et al.  Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse , 1984 .

[21]  B. Latour.  We Have Never Been Modern , 1991 .

[22]  Jeremy F. Dent.  Accounting and organizational cultures: A field study of the emergence of a new organizational reality , 1991 .

[23]  M. Foucault,et al.  Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 , 1980 .

[24]  T. Tinker,et al.  THE 'REAL' CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE OF ACCOUNTS. , 1987 .

[25]  Mark W. Dirsmith,et al.  The use of budgetary symbols in the political arena: An historically informed field study , 1988 .

[26]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  The Role of Information Systems in the UK National Health Service: Action at a Distance and the Fetish of Calculation , 1991 .

[27]  A. Lowe.  "Action at a distance":accounting inscriptions and the reporting of episodes of clinical care , 2001 .

[28]  Keith Robson,et al.  ACCOUNTING NUMBERS AS 'INSCRIPTION': ACTION AT A DISTANCE AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF ACCOUNTING. , 1992 .

[29]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[30]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[31]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[32]  B. Latour.  On Recalling Ant , 1999 .

[33]  J. Law.  After Ant: Complexity, Naming and Topology , 1999 .

[34]  Keith Robson,et al.  Inflation accounting and action at a distance: The sandilands episode , 1994 .

[35]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  Power, Machines and Social Relations: Delegating to Information Technology in the National Health Service , 1995 .

[36]  Peter Miller,et al.  The multiplying machine , 1997 .

[37]  John Hassard,et al.  Organization Unbound: Actor-Network Theory, Research Strategy and Institutional Flexibility , 1999 .

[38]  D. Lavoie.  The accounting of interpretations and the interpretation of accounts: The communicative function of “the language of business” , 1987 .

[39]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  Machines and manoeuvres: Responsibility accounting and the construction of hospital information systems , 1992 .

[40]  R. Hines.  The Sociopolitical Paradigm in Financial Accounting Research , 1989 .

[41]  Grant Mccracken.  The long interview , 1988 .

[42]  Rolland Munro,et al.  Power and Discretion: Membership Work in the Time of Technology , 1999 .

[43]  Paul Ricoeur,et al.  The conflict of interpretations , 1969 .

[44]  Wai Fong Chua,et al.  Experts, networks and inscriptions in the fabrication of accounting images: A story of the representation of three public hospitals , 1995 .

[45]  A. Gouldner.  The dialectic of ideology and technology , 1976 .

[46]  John Law,et al.  On the Methods of Long-Distance Control: Vessels, Navigation and the Portuguese Route to India , 1984 .

[47]  J. Potter.  Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction , 1996 .

[48]  John W. Meyer.  Social environments and organizational accounting , 1986 .

[49]  Janine Nahapiet.  The rhetoric and reality of an accounting change: A study of resource allocation , 1988 .

[50]  A. Lowe,et al.  The construction of a network at Health Waikato. The "towards clinical budgeting" project. , 2000, Journal of management in medicine.

[51]  K. K. Cetina.  Sociality with Objects , 1997 .

[52]  Janine Nahapiet,et al.  The roles of accounting in organizations and society , 1980 .

[53]  A. Richardson,et al.  ACCOUNTING AS A LEGITIMATING INSTITUTION. , 1987 .

[54]  M. Alvesson.  Doing critical management research , 2000 .

[55]  Mahmoud Ezzamel,et al.  Organizational Change and Accounting: Understanding the Budgeting System in its Organizational Context , 1994 .

[56]  A. Bhimani.  Indeterminacy and the specificity of accounting change: Renault 1898–1938☆ , 1993 .

[57]  B. Latour.  Aramis, or the Love of Technology , 1993 .

[58]  Richard Laughlin,et al.  Empirical research in accounting: alternative approaches and a case for “middle‐range” thinking , 1995 .

[59]  I. Colville.  Reconstructing "behavioural accounting" , 1981 .

[60]  Peter Armstrong,et al.  Cost accounting, controlling labour and the rise of conglomerates , 1991 .

[61]  Anthony A. Atkinson,et al.  Standards for Field Research in Management Accounting , 1998 .

[62]  Keith Robson,et al.  On the arenas of accounting change: the process of translation , 1991 .

[63]  J. Hassard,et al.  Actor Network Theory and After , 1999 .

[64]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Frameworks of power , 1989 .

[65]  Zygmunt Bauman,et al.  Hermeneutics and social science , 1980 .

[66]  R. Boland.  Beyond the objectivist and the subjectivist: Learning to read accounting as text☆ , 1989 .

[67]  Bill Doolin,et al.  Sociotechnical networks and information management in health care , 1999 .

[68]  Rod Coombs,et al.  Fabricating budgets: A study of the production of management budgeting in the national health service , 1992 .